Problem with ESO maps. Part 1.

Carlos93

Hello community, I have come to comment on a problem that I have been observing with each new zone DLC.

The problem I am raising is the disproportionate amount of Tamriel map zoma that each new zone DLC takes up.

An example:



This is Tamriel today.

If you look at it, there is little space left in Tamriel, if we continue this way, the map of Tamrial will not last another ten years.

The solution would be to make maps with the same extension but taking a smaller piece of Tamriel.

An example:



I will continue in part 2 of this publication.

Greetings and good discussion.

Necrotech_Master

i think you are also discounting non-tamriel zones that are not technically part of that map (coldharbour, clockwork city, fargrave, deadlands, arteum)

im wondering when they will do other zones around daedric prices (shivering isles or apocrypha for example)

Cryptor

you are basing your entire theory on assumption that without any zones left on the current map no space is left for additional content. you could not be more wrong. there are non-tamriel zones (some already in place) and let's not rule out map additions and revising the existing map. not that this will ever be needed but something along the lines of WoWs Cataclysm is possible as well.

Personally, I hope to see more non-Tamriel zones.

Carlos93

The island of Artaeum should have been bigger since it was in Tamriel, but the psijic took it away from Tamriel.

kaushad

I don't want to put off going to Rihad unti 2036. Maybe if every little zone had intricate attention to detail and novelty, it would be worth waiting a bit longer, as it sometimes is with Q4 DLC compared to chapters, but I don't see why (literally checks TESI: Arena map) the Rockpark area deserves its own dedicated DLC.