Sailor_Palutena wrote: »I also love how it feels very natural, instead of some other companies that force it into the context making it look superficial.CaptainVenom wrote: »Into the Vice Den and Hadran's Fall in Reaper's March, where you help Sind rescue his boyfriend Tand. Also there's a quest in Bangkorai (I don't remember the name) where you help a guy who dates a dude with lycanthropy problems, and a quest in Summerset related to a woman and her transgender sister.
I should say I love how Zenimax/Bethesda brought LGBT into ES world. Good work, ZOS! 🏳️🌈❤️🧡💛💚💙💜🖤
https://www.imperial-library.info/content/lgbtq-tamriel
Scroll down to Elder Scrolls Online. It's listed by NPC rather than by quest, and may include spoilers.
NotaDaedraWorshipper wrote: »Didn't someone make a list of all LGBTQ things in Elder Scrolls, including ESO? I'm sure I remember it has been brought up more than once.https://www.imperial-library.info/content/lgbtq-tamriel
Scroll down to Elder Scrolls Online. It's listed by NPC rather than by quest, and may include spoilers.
Ah, someone has already linked it
furiouslog wrote: »There is also a Thieves Guild quest featuring a lesbian couple (also interracial - dumner/khajit!)
StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
Edit to add: about that "normalize" part - there's a lot of stuff that was completely taboo or was considered unnatural or just generally inappropriate not so long ago. So I imagine some people still need to be assured and others need to be reminded that some things are OK now.
OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
Edit to add: about that "normalize" part - there's a lot of stuff that was completely taboo or was considered unnatural or just generally inappropriate not so long ago. So I imagine some people still need to be assured and others need to be reminded that some things are OK now.
Well, there is a difference between representation (which in my opinion ESO does quite well) and forceful representation, aka "shoving stuff down everyone's throat" (which in my opinion ESO does not do).
The former I am perfectly fine with, howerver, I do not want the latter to happen in ESO, as it would change my favourite fantasy universe to something not enjoyable at all. Some people may be more sensitive to any shift towards the latter.
OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
Edit to add: about that "normalize" part - there's a lot of stuff that was completely taboo or was considered unnatural or just generally inappropriate not so long ago. So I imagine some people still need to be assured and others need to be reminded that some things are OK now.
Well, there is a difference between representation (which in my opinion ESO does quite well) and forceful representation, aka "shoving stuff down everyone's throat" (which in my opinion ESO does not do).
The former I am perfectly fine with, howerver, I do not want the latter to happen in ESO, as it would change my favourite fantasy universe to something not enjoyable at all. Some people may be more sensitive to any shift towards the latter.
Up until Greymoor, I'd probably agree with you, it was so apparent that it was eye rolling. I actually began to feel sorry for gay people, surely they don't like having part of their identity sold back to them as a cheap commodity in this fashion. I obviously don't speak on their behalf however.
I didn't feel that "gayness" was forced in Greymoor at all. Maybe "female-ness". I think that quests with necromancer and frozen stuff could feel more natural if (spoiler just in case)OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
Edit to add: about that "normalize" part - there's a lot of stuff that was completely taboo or was considered unnatural or just generally inappropriate not so long ago. So I imagine some people still need to be assured and others need to be reminded that some things are OK now.
Well, there is a difference between representation (which in my opinion ESO does quite well) and forceful representation, aka "shoving stuff down everyone's throat" (which in my opinion ESO does not do).
The former I am perfectly fine with, howerver, I do not want the latter to happen in ESO, as it would change my favourite fantasy universe to something not enjoyable at all. Some people may be more sensitive to any shift towards the latter.
Up until Greymoor, I'd probably agree with you, it was so apparent that it was eye rolling. I actually began to feel sorry for gay people, surely they don't like having part of their identity sold back to them as a cheap commodity in this fashion. I obviously don't speak on their behalf however.
spartaxoxo wrote: »StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
I would have given even more help if I knew that to counteract someone withdrawing help. It's a school. It's learning. You can't expect someone to change ideas that might not be ideal without education.
I think this kind of assignment is great for understanding and ESO does a fantastic job with representation.
Even if it's the latter wouldn't it be better if even biased report contained proper sources? If I see, say, an article titled "Videogames are normalizing horrendous practice of being nice to animals", I'm going right in just to see examples of those beautiful gamesStabbityDoom wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
I would have given even more help if I knew that to counteract someone withdrawing help. It's a school. It's learning. You can't expect someone to change ideas that might not be ideal without education.
I think this kind of assignment is great for understanding and ESO does a fantastic job with representation.
I am asking whether its a neutral position paper or coming at it from a position of "being gay is bad and video games are normalizing this sick behavior" paper [this is an example, not my opinion]. If it's the latter, I think it's important to know what we are aiding with. Helping with education is one thing, but if it's an opinion piece, I think we should know.
Even if it's the latter wouldn't it be better if even biased report contained proper sources? If I see, say, an article titled "Videogames are normalizing horrendous practice of being nice to animals", I'm going right in just to see examples of those beautiful games
I'm not sure, honestly. I've heard that saying (no idea about source, sorry) that roughly translates into "a report about a carriage running over a dog can be presented in such a way that people will exclaim: "Down with the Republic!". Maybe it's better to provide sources that are not at least "pre-twisted". Maybe it's better not to, to avoid, so to say, tainting their reputation, because I just remembered that nowadays if someone says "ESO shows bad things" loud enough, nobody is going to check if it's true.StabbityDoom wrote: »Even if it's the latter wouldn't it be better if even biased report contained proper sources? If I see, say, an article titled "Videogames are normalizing horrendous practice of being nice to animals", I'm going right in just to see examples of those beautiful games
true! sources should be valid, but I'd be less inclined to PERSONALLY help in that case [the animals one you are giving.]
OP says nothing about LGBTQ+ (gosh, it has grown, I remember when it was only LGBT) so it's totally possible that they are only interested in the "LG" part.StabbityDoom wrote: »Is this a subjective or an objective paper you are writing? It doesn't sound objective, because "normalize" has a negative connotation in this context and you use "gay" instead of LGBTQ, as if gay covers all of that, which it doesn't. I feel like asking us for help on such a sensitive topic without explaining your direction on this is a bit misleading. I'm not asking you to politicize or take a side - to be clear - I just would like to know if you are doing an objective paper or not. That's all. I'm not sure if the people who answered would have done so if they knew your goal here was going to end up as evidence for a subjective argument paper.
Edit to add: about that "normalize" part - there's a lot of stuff that was completely taboo or was considered unnatural or just generally inappropriate not so long ago. So I imagine some people still need to be assured and others need to be reminded that some things are OK now.
Well, there is a difference between representation (which in my opinion ESO does quite well) and forceful representation, aka "shoving stuff down everyone's throat" (which in my opinion ESO does not do).
The former I am perfectly fine with, howerver, I do not want the latter to happen in ESO, as it would change my favourite fantasy universe to something not enjoyable at all. Some people may be more sensitive to any shift towards the latter.
Up until Greymoor, I'd probably agree with you, it was so apparent that it was eye rolling. I actually began to feel sorry for gay people, surely they don't like having part of their identity sold back to them as a cheap commodity in this fashion. I obviously don't speak on their behalf however.