Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nice, but what is the point of playing NB without cloak / invisibility ? You might as well roll pretty much ANY other class and it will most likely perform way better...
Master_Kas wrote: »'' Have you seen whats installed on his PC in the background? Is he showing his fingers/keyboard " cracked me up xD
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nice, but what is the point of playing NB without cloak / invisibility ? You might as well roll pretty much ANY other class and it will most likely perform way better...
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nice, but what is the point of playing NB without cloak / invisibility ? You might as well roll pretty much ANY other class and it will most likely perform way better...
he is using dark cloak
exeeter702 wrote: »Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nice, but what is the point of playing NB without cloak / invisibility ? You might as well roll pretty much ANY other class and it will most likely perform way better...
he is using dark cloak
I think he knows that. He just subscribes to the belief that NBs that dont play around shadowy disguise are in essence, neutered as a rule compared to other classes. Which is silly of course.
you may now join us real players on real classes by displaying your ability to not cloak, bravo sir, someone get this man a DK.
exeeter702 wrote: »Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Nice, but what is the point of playing NB without cloak / invisibility ? You might as well roll pretty much ANY other class and it will most likely perform way better...
he is using dark cloak
I think he knows that. He just subscribes to the belief that NBs that dont play around shadowy disguise are in essence, neutered as a rule compared to other classes. Which is silly of course.
I read it as less of a statement about power and more one of differentiation. And there is a lot of merit to that claim -- dark cloak is a good heal but this type of build is basically a magsorc build, but gimped.
That said, glad the OP is enjoying themself.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »My point was: Why would you play as a NB without invisibility, if your class passives revolve arround sneaky game play ? You are missing those bonuses that you would normally have.
That is like playing a mag sorc without streak or shields. I am sure it is possible, but you are only gimping yourself and become less competative...
I read it as less of a statement about power and more one of differentiation. And there is a lot of merit to that claim -- dark cloak is a good heal but this type of build is basically a magsorc build, but gimped.
That said, glad the OP is enjoying themself.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »I see some people got confused with what I previoulsy said. Don't get me wrong. I am happy that someone was able to play NB without relying on invisibilty. It is good. Also I think it could be part of the reason it worked. It is a "mental" trick. Enemy players expect NB to cloak. If you don't cloak, you kinda confuse them...
My point was: Why would you play as a NB without invisibility, if your class passives revolve arround sneaky game play ? You are missing those bonuses that you would normally have.
That is like playing a mag sorc without streak or shields. I am sure it is possible, but you are only gimping yourself and become less competative...