Ticket 200130-003359

KillsAllElves

Would like to receive a response in regards to suspicious behavior on a ticket i recently submitted. This incredulous activity has been going on for several days. I have videos to support my query.

idk

I do not work for Zos and ofc have not seen the video or ticket. However, it seems you are suggestring the ticket concerned behavior of another player. If it concerns activity of another player Zos does not reply to let the player who reported the behavior to know what came of the investigation or actions made towards the player. Probably a privacy thing. They will only acknowledge they received the ticket. So, just FYI if that is the case.

KillsAllElves

idk wrote: »

I do not work for Zos and ofc have not seen the video or ticket. However, it seems you are suggestring the ticket concerned behavior of another player. If it concerns activity of another player Zos does not reply to let the player who reported the behavior to know what came of the investigation or actions made towards the player. Probably a privacy thing. They will only acknowledge they received the ticket. So, just FYI if that is the case.

Ive been through this once with zos last summer. They will contact me via direct message and ask for the links.

idk

No offense but you are not making that clear in the OP. The OP just sounds like you reported a player and want to hear what is going on.

So what you added sheds a very different light. @ZOS_BillE might be able to check and see if they need more information that you have.

Alienoutlaw

1st off Ticket 200130-003359 dated 30th Jan position 3359 in the queue so you will not get a response anytime soon.
2nd in regards to behaviour of another player ZOS will not reply to you with any details. IF they feel more information is needed they may ask for supporting evidence but still will not inform you of the outcome if any.
3rd submitting multiple tickets will only result in your initial enquiry being put to the back of the queue

KillsAllElves

idk wrote: »

No offense but you are not making that clear in the OP. The OP just sounds like you reported a player and want to hear what is going on.

So what you added sheds a very different light. @ZOS_BillE might be able to check and see if they need more information that you have.

@idk

L M A O. Already taken care of, i am not going to post a video due to the naming and shaming policy. The OP is very clear and youre not going to see the videos.

KillsAllElves

Alienoutlaw wrote: »

1st off Ticket 200130-003359 dated 30th Jan position 3359 in the queue so you will not get a response anytime soon.
2nd in regards to behaviour of another player ZOS will not reply to you with any details. IF they feel more information is needed they may ask for supporting evidence but still will not inform you of the outcome if any.
3rd submitting multiple tickets will only result in your initial enquiry being put to the back of the queue

Already taken care of and you assume i was asking about information on the player when i was not.

Alienoutlaw

KillsAllElves wrote: »

Alienoutlaw wrote: »

1st off Ticket 200130-003359 dated 30th Jan position 3359 in the queue so you will not get a response anytime soon.
2nd in regards to behaviour of another player ZOS will not reply to you with any details. IF they feel more information is needed they may ask for supporting evidence but still will not inform you of the outcome if any.
3rd submitting multiple tickets will only result in your initial enquiry being put to the back of the queue

Already taken care of and you assume i was asking about information on the player when i was not.

your OP was very vague so the implication was justified. glad you got it sorted though
edited typo

KillsAllElves

Alienoutlaw wrote: »

KillsAllElves wrote: »

Alienoutlaw wrote: »

1st off Ticket 200130-003359 dated 30th Jan position 3359 in the queue so you will not get a response anytime soon.
2nd in regards to behaviour of another player ZOS will not reply to you with any details. IF they feel more information is needed they may ask for supporting evidence but still will not inform you of the outcome if any.
3rd submitting multiple tickets will only result in your initial enquiry being put to the back of the queue

Already taken care of and you assume i was asking about information on the player when i was not.

your OP was very vague so the implication was justified. glad you got it sorted though
edited typo

No it was not vague you just misread it!

Alienoutlaw

you asked for a response for a ticket lodged reporting a player for their behaviour i responded to that end. i'm not going to arguing the toss about it

idk

KillsAllElves wrote: »

idk wrote: »

No offense but you are not making that clear in the OP. The OP just sounds like you reported a player and want to hear what is going on.

So what you added sheds a very different light. @ZOS_BillE might be able to check and see if they need more information that you have.

@idk

L M A O. Already taken care of, i am not going to post a video due to the naming and shaming policy. The OP is very clear and youre not going to see the videos.

LMAO, I never suggest or even hinted you post a video in this thread to name or shame.. I merely noted that the added information that you were waiting for Zos to ask for the evidence made clear what as vague in the OP. It is why I tagged a Zos employee to help you directly.

Please do not take offense that Alien and myself noted the OP statement being vague. It is just explaining to you why there is a consistent misunderstanding of what you are trying to say and the inference is appropriate. The results speak for themselves if there is any question. Alien is a pretty bright person.

KillsAllElves

Alienoutlaw wrote: »

you asked for a response for a ticket lodged reporting a player for their behaviour i responded to that end. i'm not going to arguing the toss about it

Well i dont know maybe its because zos has sent me multiple emails about this and directed to put a ticket on the forum. This is why you dont make assumptions about something when youre not involved with the situation or the conversation.

KillsAllElves

idk wrote: »

KillsAllElves wrote: »

idk wrote: »

No offense but you are not making that clear in the OP. The OP just sounds like you reported a player and want to hear what is going on.

So what you added sheds a very different light. @ZOS_BillE might be able to check and see if they need more information that you have.

@idk

L M A O. Already taken care of, i am not going to post a video due to the naming and shaming policy. The OP is very clear and youre not going to see the videos.

LMAO, I never suggest or even hinted you post a video in this thread to name or shame.. I merely noted that the added information that you were waiting for Zos to ask for the evidence made clear what as vague in the OP. It is why I tagged a Zos employee to help you directly.

Please do not take offense that Alien and myself noted the OP statement being vague. It is just explaining to you why there is a consistent misunderstanding of what you are trying to say and the inference is appropriate. The results speak for themselves if there is any question. Alien is a pretty bright person.

L M A O.. You made an assumption on something irrelevant to you. I didnt ask for information on the player. Do your self a favor and dont respond to this thread anymore.

Alienoutlaw

@idk i appreciate the compliment, Thank you

ZOS_GregoryV

Greetings all,

After reviewing the thread, we have decided to close it down as it seems to have taken a negative turn. When making threads/posts, we ask that they remain civil, constructive, and within the guidelines of the rules. If there may be any questions in regards to the rules, please feel free to take a few moment to review them here.

Thank you for your understanding,
-Greg-