Should BG's have access to the same sets for rewards as Cyrodil?

alexj4596b14_ESO

I noticed that all BGs gear rewards are pretty much trash. How does the community feel about having access to the same sets as Cyrodil for mail rewards?

Beardimus

No TY as be no difference with all the ROTW you get. Just revisit the sets. BG should reward differently as its a different gig.

Impreg was saught after on launch, and is still one one of few ways to get decent Crit Resist in noCP, Wizards Reposte was popular till utterly nerfed.

alexj4596b14_ESO

Beardimus wrote: »

No TY as be no difference with all the ROTW you get. Just revisit the sets. BG should reward differently as its a different gig.

Impreg was saught after on launch, and is still one one of few ways to get decent Crit Resist in noCP, Wizards Reposte was popular till utterly nerfed.

I can't speak for everyone who plays BGs. But one of the main reasons I don't play Cyrodil is because Horse Simulations are not fun. I know why it's a thing and I can respect that. Also if IC gets the same rewards as Cyrodil then It may not be that big of a deal I suppose.

CatchMeTrolling

You would think sharing pvp sets would be a good thing but really it’s not. Simply because how it is now gives players more incentive to play both if they want to get sets themselves. Hopefully they add more sets for the imperial city once it becomes its own campaign.

Edit: Bgs has actually had decent sets. Wizards, impreg, knight slayer, cowards, spell strategist etc. have all had their uses or still being used. If anything impreg is probably top 5 sets right now since people are complaining about damage.

Datolite

They do. It's called a guild trader.