starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
What gave you that idea?
KingYogi415 wrote: »If ESO is so great, why is there no ESO 2?
SilverIce58 wrote: »I'd much rather see a second ESO take place in the Merethic or the 1st Era. There's so much that happens during those Eras that it would be super cool to see it take place for ourselves. Not to mention there'd be a bunch of races still in existence, and the Alessian Empire (for the 1st Era) would be the rulers of [most of] Tamriel.
starkerealm wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
What gave you that idea?
A bunch of minor details in the original game. Stuff like Cropsford being on the map. Also the membership in the Dominion lines up with the Fourth Era. Honestly, to an extent, a lot of the political map in ESO is reminiscent (though not identical to) the 4e200 map. Which, you could just chalk up to, "yeah, it's the same spaces," but it feels more consistent than that.
I mean, it's not like I could say, "yeah, this was supposed to be a sequel to Skyrim," but, I've always been left with the impression that some of the design decisions were more in line with that era.
dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »SilverIce58 wrote: »I'd much rather see a second ESO take place in the Merethic or the 1st Era. There's so much that happens during those Eras that it would be super cool to see it take place for ourselves. Not to mention there'd be a bunch of races still in existence, and the Alessian Empire (for the 1st Era) would be the rulers of [most of] Tamriel.
I would rather the game moved forward to somewhere else like Akavir. There are of course races I'd like to see in action though like the Kothringi and Dwemer but I am hesitant about it because the mystery of their past is part of the fun.
SilverIce58 wrote: »dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »SilverIce58 wrote: »I'd much rather see a second ESO take place in the Merethic or the 1st Era. There's so much that happens during those Eras that it would be super cool to see it take place for ourselves. Not to mention there'd be a bunch of races still in existence, and the Alessian Empire (for the 1st Era) would be the rulers of [most of] Tamriel.
I would rather the game moved forward to somewhere else like Akavir. There are of course races I'd like to see in action though like the Kothringi and Dwemer but I am hesitant about it because the mystery of their past is part of the fun.
Yeah, while I'd love to see other islands/continents like Pyandonea/Thras/Akavir, the same could be said about those places that the mystery of those places is part of the fun. Speculating on what the Coral Kingdoms look like, or what the architecture of the Tang Mo/Kamal/Tsaesci/Ka'Po'Tun looks like. Or even if the Tsaesci are actually Snake-men or are they just called that because their features resemble snake features.
I agree with you tho...mostly
lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
What gave you that idea?
A bunch of minor details in the original game. Stuff like Cropsford being on the map. Also the membership in the Dominion lines up with the Fourth Era. Honestly, to an extent, a lot of the political map in ESO is reminiscent (though not identical to) the 4e200 map. Which, you could just chalk up to, "yeah, it's the same spaces," but it feels more consistent than that.
I mean, it's not like I could say, "yeah, this was supposed to be a sequel to Skyrim," but, I've always been left with the impression that some of the design decisions were more in line with that era.
Well, the reason I ask is that a lot of the early design for the game came right about the time that Oblivion came out. I think a lot of ESO was originally conceived before work on Skyrim even started.
starkerealm wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
What gave you that idea?
A bunch of minor details in the original game. Stuff like Cropsford being on the map. Also the membership in the Dominion lines up with the Fourth Era. Honestly, to an extent, a lot of the political map in ESO is reminiscent (though not identical to) the 4e200 map. Which, you could just chalk up to, "yeah, it's the same spaces," but it feels more consistent than that.
I mean, it's not like I could say, "yeah, this was supposed to be a sequel to Skyrim," but, I've always been left with the impression that some of the design decisions were more in line with that era.
The reason why ESO was set in the past is that there was this huge gap in the lore that has been pretty empty due to dragon breaks and all that stuff. ESO is filling some of that gap now. The major issue I see with putting ESO2 in the future is that all the following titles will have to work around that and build on top of the MMO. That can be quite bothersome, especially if the MMO is still being played while the new game is coming out. Just imagine how bummed out all AD and EP players would be if DC winning the war was considered canon. The only solution for that would be to leave the outcome blank and take the same approach as with ESO. Just put a huge gap behind the events of the MMO so you can't really trace it back. Or yet another dragonbreak (which is the easy way out).
CardboardedBox wrote: »*cough* fallout online *cough*
yeah, ESO kinda stuck in history. Only way back. All that lore in ESO will be nearly pointless when TES 6 comes.
Glockcoma725 wrote: »CardboardedBox wrote: »*cough* fallout online *cough*
this. Pretty sure they recently just won the custody battle to MAKE fallout online, so it will be coming.
starkerealm wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »To be honest, my impression was that ESO was originally slated to be set after the events of Skyrim.
What gave you that idea?
A bunch of minor details in the original game. Stuff like Cropsford being on the map. Also the membership in the Dominion lines up with the Fourth Era. Honestly, to an extent, a lot of the political map in ESO is reminiscent (though not identical to) the 4e200 map. Which, you could just chalk up to, "yeah, it's the same spaces," but it feels more consistent than that.
I mean, it's not like I could say, "yeah, this was supposed to be a sequel to Skyrim," but, I've always been left with the impression that some of the design decisions were more in line with that era.
ESO production started with Oblivion, before production of Skyrim started.
KingYogi415 wrote: »If ESO is so great, why is there no ESO 2?
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »There shouldn’t be another one.
Just keep updating this one
@Knowledge If there is another ESO game will you continue to spam its forums as well?