It is still usefull. It has lost some utility because its not OP anymore. It really didnt make much sense how nb could cloak a wb and just stand in the same spot, or all of a sudden dissapear mid gap close. Now it can be used more skillfully imo.
It is still usefull. It has lost some utility because its not OP anymore. It really didnt make much sense how nb could cloak a wb and just stand in the same spot, or all of a sudden dissapear mid gap close. Now it can be used more skillfully imo.
No. It was skillful to react quickly and force miss attacks. The nightblade would dip in and out of aggression while its opponent would attempt to keep detection on it to beat it down.
Now using it in combat achieves nothing, and nightblades are left lacking their primarily defensive mechanic (the force miss). Even wrecking blow and LIGHT ATTACKS pull us out of cloak and hit us... Why do you think nightblades have been pushed into anti-engagement play styles like proxy bombing and one shot ganking for the last few major patches?
Is that what you like nightblades to do?
Because that's what you just said.
Go play nightblade if you disagree. You'll see. I'm the only nightblade player I've seen around in a long time who actually tries to fight people face to face in melee range, and I found back in the winter that cloak is completely nonfunctional in that scenario.
It is still usefull. It has lost some utility because its not OP anymore. It really didnt make much sense how nb could cloak a wb and just stand in the same spot, or all of a sudden dissapear mid gap close. Now it can be used more skillfully imo.
No. It was skillful to react quickly and force miss attacks. The nightblade would dip in and out of aggression while its opponent would attempt to keep detection on it to beat it down.
Now using it in combat achieves nothing, and nightblades are left lacking their primarily defensive mechanic (the force miss). Even wrecking blow and LIGHT ATTACKS pull us out of cloak and hit us... Why do you think nightblades have been pushed into anti-engagement play styles like proxy bombing and one shot ganking for the last few major patches?
Is that what you like nightblades to do?
Because that's what you just said.
Go play nightblade if you disagree. You'll see. I'm the only nightblade player I've seen around in a long time who actually tries to fight people face to face in melee range, and I found back in the winter that cloak is completely nonfunctional in that scenario.
@Lokey0024 Standard, choking talons, harness, empowering chains, whip, and fossilize is a decent magicka DK front bar which achieves everything in your list, trading the snare for double roots, one of which can be applied at range and follows the hard cc through block, forcing a dodge roll after breaking free.
Now stop acting like a victim and learn the classes. Nightblades have the least number of survival mechanics of all classes, especially magicka, making them more reliant on each individual skill than the other classes. Break just cloak, and suddenly nightblades are struggling to fight straight up and are forced into ganking and bombing and avoiding fights.
If you're ok with that, then you're ok with nerfing a class into an imbalanced state just because you don't like them.
thankyourat wrote: ».It is still usefull. It has lost some utility because its not OP anymore. It really didnt make much sense how nb could cloak a wb and just stand in the same spot, or all of a sudden dissapear mid gap close. Now it can be used more skillfully imo.
No. It was skillful to react quickly and force miss attacks. The nightblade would dip in and out of aggression while its opponent would attempt to keep detection on it to beat it down.
Now using it in combat achieves nothing, and nightblades are left lacking their primarily defensive mechanic (the force miss). Even wrecking blow and LIGHT ATTACKS pull us out of cloak and hit us... Why do you think nightblades have been pushed into anti-engagement play styles like proxy bombing and one shot ganking for the last few major patches?
Is that what you like nightblades to do?
Because that's what you just said.
Go play nightblade if you disagree. You'll see. I'm the only nightblade player I've seen around in a long time who actually tries to fight people face to face in melee range, and I found back in the winter that cloak is completely nonfunctional in that scenario.
Cloak being broken is really bad on magblade because we can't dodge roll. So it really was a skillful way for us to mitigate damage when outnumbered. Now it's too easy for people to just unskillfully spam gap closers at us and just spam abilities with no thought at all. You can use the shade but if someone casts a ability like wrecking blow you'll still get hit by it even if you teleport 15m behind your opponent, same way with crystal frag because abilities lock on to you.
@Lokey0024 You said I couldn't do it. You were wrong. Shoo. Only reason I said harness was because you included wards in your nightblade list -- unless we're front barring resto staves? mDK and mageblade have access to the same wards aside from igneous. Don't say they're op on us but useless on you.
Then you complained about stam dodge rolling and shuffle. Irrelevant.
And you said that Templar class abilities and passives are complete and on par with nightblade, and implied that DK and sorc aren't. Lol Templars have more buggy abilities and useless passives than anyone, and stam DK and magicka sorc are doing fine in PvP. Heck, mDK has a couple of the best designed abilities and passives in the game too.
Shade is about as good of a defensive mechanic as igneous shield, but it's supposed to be our second big defensive mechanic -- our streak or breath of life or wings. It's useful, but it just doesn't compare. And there you a second time. Sup with that?
And mDK has plenty of tools and damage to kill a mageblade. It's a fairer fight than you give it credit for. If you're struggling, stop victimizing and feeling sorry for yourself and look to improve your build or mechanics.
You're just too biased and emotional. Can't have a constructive conversation with you. Sorry I tried.
@Lokey0024 You said I couldn't do it. You were wrong. Shoo. Only reason I said harness was because you included wards in your nightblade list -- unless we're front barring resto staves? mDK and mageblade have access to the same wards aside from igneous. Don't say they're op on us but useless on you.
Then you complained about stam dodge rolling and shuffle. Irrelevant.
And you said that Templar class abilities and passives are complete and on par with nightblade, and implied that DK and sorc aren't. Lol Templars have more buggy abilities and useless passives than anyone, and stam DK and magicka sorc are doing fine in PvP. Heck, mDK has a couple of the best designed abilities and passives in the game too.
Shade is about as good of a defensive mechanic as igneous shield, but it's supposed to be our second big defensive mechanic -- our streak or breath of life or wings. It's useful, but it just doesn't compare. And there you a second time. Sup with that?
And mDK has plenty of tools and damage to kill a mageblade. It's a fairer fight than you give it credit for. If you're struggling, stop victimizing and feeling sorry for yourself and look to improve your build or mechanics.
You're just too biased and emotional. Can't have a constructive conversation with you. Sorry I tried.
The real question is do you really believe half of this? Emotional? Biased? I just spent the last 3 hours playing my NB in Scourge and its like night and day easy mode. Im not saying this because i feel anything, its what ive observed. Im not sure what conversation you surmised would come from you saying "geez every class can make a super op build using any class abilities" and fail to do so yet claim you did and tell me in just emotional?
I wouldnt be surprised if the "bug" was intentional.
Wards that i meant are armor/spell resist buffs btw.