#Hirefengrush

StoneSlayer

Begone foul AOE caps!

Jaronking

Agreed.

Tomato

I second that

Alucardo

Didgerion

he stays on this side of the fence

KatzMainTank

Have the community draw up his contract. AoE cap wet-work for hire. #GiveYourselfToTheLORD

SirDopey

ummm, no, just no

rfennell_ESO

Hey, pretty sure he's available for employment! Though I suspect lateness could be an issue.

While we're at it why don't we nominate Abubakar Shekau for the UN's human rights seat?

acw37162

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

Forestd16b14_ESO

No.

RAGUNAnoOne

i would rather they hire @Gidorick instead at least he could make the game more fun and viable for anyone with his ideas instead of fun and viability ONLY for the already overused pure damage dealing builds like fengrush wants.

Gidorick

RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »

i would rather they hire @Gidorick instead at least he could make the game more fun and viable for anyone with his ideas instead of fun and viability ONLY for the already overused pure damage dealing builds like fengrush wants.

heh. Thanks @RAGUNAnoOne , but I don't think ZOS would want someone with my particular "passion".

LegendaryChef

#HireFengrush

Moglijuana

They should just hire @FENGRUSH to police the forums. I'd much rather see his "play nice" messages littered with f bombs than to keep finding Zos responses that literally add nothing to a conversation.

Remove the caps! Let my DK set everyone on FIREEEE.

dodgehopper_ESO

acw37162 wrote: »

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

I agree to some of the sentiment here, though I have no problems with @Fengrush. I think there shouldn't be aoe caps, but then again I also wish there were player collision (Enemy & Friendly), as well as friendly fire. The whole problem with aoe damage particularly in pvp is that it is too high for what it does, and there is no tactical reason not to use it. I think by forcing friendly fire damage on most AOE (not ultimates) you would have to be a lot more tactical in play, and this would natural force players to be careful in the skills they use. Some skills might potentially defy this for instance Luminous Shards should probably not be friendly fire since it is also a way to deliver stamina and healing to a friendly target. At any regard I think the issue is that the tactics themselves lend themselves toward piling up mob vs. mob wielding aoe vs aoe. Precision targeting is the realm of small unit tactics in this game, because single target damage is generally not much better than aoe damage, but requires a lot more work, with less payout (You get more AP if you've hit 20 targets and they die, than 2).

PURPLE245

#Hirefengrush! #FengrushDrunkReviews #No1StamSorc #Biceps #THELORD!!!!!!!

PURPLE245

acw37162 wrote: »

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

erm.... from all i see is zergs spamming aoes anyways??? would it not just be more fair for a smaller group to actually have a chance against mindless aoe spammers? because with aoe caps or no aoe caps zergs will still mindlessly spam aoes no matter what it will just give smaller groups that small chance to fight right?

FENGRUSH

acw37162 wrote: »

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

Just wanted to say - the whole 'nerfing templar' thing is not true and a completely misunderstood concept. Im not sure where it comes really - maybe because I complain when a guy Im about to kill gets healed to full by a single BOL. This isnt really a complaint with templars as much as it is with the shift in meta that is created with powerful heals at low cost (CP system issue, not a templar issue).

And if youre a stamplar.. theres NO WAY IN HELL youve ever heard anything outside of BUFFING stamplar, because what they really had in 1.6 that set them apart was taken away, specifically with their jabs. All of my builds and theory crafting were done with a stamplar - Essa-kh. Im very familiar with what a stamplar can and could do from their transition out of 1.6. Stamplars need more than fixes, they actually do need adjustments and buffs - as does stam sorc.

Just wanted to clear that point up because.. Im not advocating for templar nerfs* in any way. I did a whole bit on this on stream, I probably should have highlighted it.

Minno

FENGRUSH wrote: »

acw37162 wrote: »

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

Just wanted to say - the whole 'nerfing templar' thing is not true and a completely misunderstood concept. Im not sure where it comes really - maybe because I complain when a guy Im about to kill gets healed to full by a single BOL. This isnt really a complaint with templars as much as it is with the shift in meta that is created with powerful heals at low cost (CP system issue, not a templar issue).

And if youre a stamplar.. theres NO WAY IN HELL youve ever heard anything outside of BUFFING stamplar, because what they really had in 1.6 that set them apart was taken away, specifically with their jabs. All of my builds and theory crafting were done with a stamplar - Essa-kh. Im very familiar with what a stamplar can and could do from their transition out of 1.6. Stamplars need more than fixes, they actually do need adjustments and buffs - as does stam sorc.

Just wanted to clear that point up because.. Im not advocating for templar nerfs in any way. I did a whole bit on this on stream, I probably should have highlighted it.

You should!

FENGRUSH

whoops had to fix that last line - nerfs* not buffs!

Chrlynsch

Change a guard morph to reflect aoe damage, and watch the world burn keep in mind yout should loose all mobility with this toggled.

mdylan2013

FENGRUSH wrote: »

acw37162 wrote: »

Yeah, no.

I love his stream and he's funny but listen to him for longer then five he minutes and he would nerf Templars into the ground.

My stamplar needs no such nerfs, I can not endorse this.

If anyone thinks the spin to win, sap essence, bat swarm, proxy det, soul tether crowd was a pain in the ass pile of cheese now, remove aoe caps so no one ever has to target anything at all, just running around with aoe damage annihilitating everything, no thank you.

I find the guy who waits for a fight to start and just runs through spamming steel tornado more annoying then WB at least the guy using WB has to keep his target locked.

Adjust shields, breath of life, and barrier then see where we are at

Just wanted to say - the whole 'nerfing templar' thing is not true and a completely misunderstood concept. Im not sure where it comes really - maybe because I complain when a guy Im about to kill gets healed to full by a single BOL. This isnt really a complaint with templars as much as it is with the shift in meta that is created with powerful heals at low cost (CP system issue, not a templar issue).

And if youre a stamplar.. theres NO WAY IN HELL youve ever heard anything outside of BUFFING stamplar, because what they really had in 1.6 that set them apart was taken away, specifically with their jabs. All of my builds and theory crafting were done with a stamplar - Essa-kh. Im very familiar with what a stamplar can and could do from their transition out of 1.6. Stamplars need more than fixes, they actually do need adjustments and buffs - as does stam sorc.

Just wanted to clear that point up because.. Im not advocating for templar nerfs* in any way. I did a whole bit on this on stream, I probably should have highlighted it.

I really really really wanted to run with a stam sorc but I just couldn't see how they would be able to hold their own. I'm hoping for good news in the patch notes...

eventide03b14a_ESO

Moglijuana wrote: »

They should just hire @FENGRUSH to police the forums. I'd much rather see his "play nice" messages littered with f bombs than to keep finding Zos responses that literally add nothing to a conversation.

Remove the caps! Let my DK set everyone on FIREEEE.

Actual keyboard of an ESO forum moderator. Take note of the ctrl, c, and v keys.

SeventhCelestial

Rofl, I could see Fengrush taking out Nightblades all together.

D0ntevenL1ft

Not only that he also wants to buff the return stamina on heavy attacks CP. I second this just as much as any of his other proposed changes.

Dredlord

No just no the guy is clueless when it comes to game balance.

Arenanet made this mistake by hiring someone who was good at playing their previous game but absolutely terrible at balancing a game. Just far too much bias and no integrity or foresite. I see similarities here...

Icaruzs

Why people wants the aoe caps gone? I'm new player, and if i read correctly the max an aoe skill can hit is 6 players, isnt that enough?

Why people wants to 1x20, cyrodill is about teamplay. A soldier shouldnt be able to defeat 20 soldier with a couple of skills, there's no logic on that

About the zerg argument. Right know you can repel pretty sucefulll a large group with few people and the right siege weapons, and we will have siege buffs. Being in a zerg won't be that advantageous

Galvanize

I agree!

Faugaun

RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »

i would rather they hire @Gidorick instead at least he could make the game more fun and viable for anyone with his ideas instead of fun and viability ONLY for the already overused pure damage dealing builds like fengrush wants.

RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »

i would rather they hire @Gidorick instead at least he could make the game more fun and viable for anyone with his ideas instead of fun and viability ONLY for the already overused pure damage dealing builds like fengrush wants.

Two times! @Gidorick for Lead developer!

found1779

He's all for stamina sorcerers I'm down with this

GhostwalkerLD

RAGUNAnoOne wrote: »

i would rather they hire @Gidorick instead at least he could make the game more fun and viable for anyone with his ideas instead of fun and viability ONLY for the already overused pure damage dealing builds like fengrush wants.

Agreed. Hire @Gidorick! Some of us share that passion!

The one and ONLY thing I agree on is the removal of AOE caps to hopefully fix this constant zerg-blob idiocy that you see in Cyro.

They've already kowtowed to Feng and nerfed Templars yet further, that's enough. No more of this crap, absolutely NO hiring him.