Does it make sense to have magic damage in what is essentially a physical hitting tree of the Champion System?
Yes it does make sense as there is a difference between magic damage and damage caused by skills that cost magica. A magicka user needs to spend points in the ritual to get his magic damage increased, a stamina user needs to spent points in the apprentice to get spell penetration to increase his magic damage.Does it make sense to have magic damage in what is essentially a physical hitting tree of the Champion System?
Only 4 skills? That's nearly an entire bar. When DPS rotations can be based around as few as 2-3 skills I don't see how this is a counterargument at all, irrespective of them being in different trees.Sorc's got only 4 class skills that deals magic damage. 2 of them in separate skill trees.
NBs prefer stamina builds.
DKs benefits from Fire Damage.
Your Templar must deal with it. Put 30 CP in Blessed for better healing +1 into Spell Precision, other into Thaumaturge.
Yep, life is pain.
Yeah I can understand it being separate to elemental damage, but it is a pain to have it split from a constellation clearly designed for magicka buildsr.jan_emailb16_ESO wrote: »I understand why it is split from the elemental damage stuff, but yeah.
Most DKs spam all their points into Elemental Expert over Elfborn and Spell Erosion because the gains they get are much more fruitful. Spell Erosion is useless in some circumstances and Elfborn gives less of a damage bonus than Thaumaturge if you remove the Spell Precision passive from the equation. Ergo, Templar cannot utilise the Champion System as well as a DK.dancing.in.the.webeb17_ESO wrote: »Look you cannot focus CP on one constellation for every build. And really i do not see any problems for magika templars/NBs as you can invest to spell erosion or elfborn to open spell presision (and both are very usefull for magika builds) and then invest to Thaumaturge.
considering the templar is meant to be about divine power and such, it only makes sense that a lot of their powers use elemental damage.
lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »Yes it does make sense as there is a difference between magic damage and damage caused by skills that cost magica. A magicka user needs to spend points in the ritual to get his magic damage increased, a stamina user needs to spent points in the apprentice to get spell penetration to increase his magic damage.
Depending on the fight 30%+ of the damage I deal with my stamina nb is magic or elemental damage, so I need spell penetration.lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »Yes it does make sense as there is a difference between magic damage and damage caused by skills that cost magica. A magicka user needs to spend points in the ritual to get his magic damage increased, a stamina user needs to spent points in the apprentice to get spell penetration to increase his magic damage.
This doesn't make sense to me I understand the difference between magic damage and damage caused by skills costing magicka. But why on earth would a stamina user need to spend points in The Apprentice to get spell penetration for his magic damage? Wouldn't a stamina user be dealing physical damage. Also, Spell Erosion only counts for spells I think, not physical attacks, so a stamina user benefits nothing from this. They can spam all their points into The Ritual quite happily
Not every build ideally fits the game mechanics. DK can synergies destro and class skills as most of them do elemental dmg and Templars and NB cannot. Sorcs can synergies storm calling with staves but cannot dark magik. The more CP you invest the less is influence, so in the long run Elfborn and Spell Erosion points will add more effect then taumaturge or elemental expert.Most DKs spam all their points into Elemental Expert over Elfborn and Spell Erosion because the gains they get are much more fruitful. Spell Erosion is useless in some circumstances and Elfborn gives less of a damage bonus than Thaumaturge if you remove the Spell Precision passive from the equation. Ergo, Templar cannot utilise the Champion System as well as a DK.dancing.in.the.webeb17_ESO wrote: »Look you cannot focus CP on one constellation for every build. And really i do not see any problems for magika templars/NBs as you can invest to spell erosion or elfborn to open spell presision (and both are very usefull for magika builds) and then invest to Thaumaturge.
lolo_01b16_ESO wrote: »Depending on the fight 30%+ of the damage I deal with my stamina nb is magic or elemental damage, so I need spell penetration.
dancing.in.the.webeb17_ESO wrote: »Not every build ideally fits the game mechanics. DK can synergies destro and class skills as most of them do elemental dmg and Templars and NB cannot. Sorcs can synergies storm calling with staves but cannot dark magik. The more CP you invest the less is influence, so in the long run Elfborn and Spell Erosion points will add more effect then taumaturge or elemental expert.
The CP system isnt exactly that logical (to me)
No, it doesn't.Does it make sense to have magic damage in what is essentially a physical hitting tree of the Champion System?
Yeah, it would be a nice idea, so you could get a proper amount of them for the brilliant insight that you provided.Zorgon_The_Revenged wrote: »Bring back the "LOL" button for this entire topic please ZOS
^ this!"Ok, Magicka...hmmmm..What do we need Ele expert, spell pene, more crit etc etc.....then when the tree was full." >>>
"Holy mother we forgot Magic damage type, well *** happens, lets put it in the physical tree, nobody will notice anyway. Also doesnt matter because we are aiming at casuals and they will not give a flying f.... nor will they ever notice."
Don't see a big deal here.C'mon main templar problem is survivability and main strength no negate it is healing. You need to stack Aprrentice as templar anyway with your first magicka CP it also giving you 12% spell crit, so it working for templars, not against.