Killstreak bonus in Cyrodil

Etaniel

I think it would be more rewarding for PvPers if ZOS added killstreak bonuses in PvP like in Call Of Duty.

For instance, after 5 kills you could get a radar showing the location of all enemies in a 100m radius, and after 30 kills in a row, you could launch a nuclear bomb wiping everyone in a 2 km radius zone of your choice.

I think it would add strategy and challenge to the game.

Most importantly please make the nuclear attack non reflectable so we can finally kill dks.

#NerfDksMore

Sallington

Holy *** no thank you.

Magus

There are no reasons to encourage even more balling up and/or ganking in stealth. People are already terrified of dying in the game, it's almost a comical level.

eliisra

Please no, people already obsess about their kill/death ratio, for god knows what reason. Also terrified of dying, not moving their fat butts outside of keep walls or pushing, unless the enemy is already half-dead or outnumbered.

Do we really need more mechanics or features that rewards and promotes cheese, zerging, ranged pewpew, cowardice, KB-stealing and stealth sniping?

How about we add a penalty instead? If you spend more than 20 minutes sitting inside a keeps or hiding on top of a wall, spamming bow/destro/Leeching Regeneration, than you get -50% AP from all sources lol.

Junipus

Only if it's a 5% increase in AP per kill after around 20 killing blows.

Those who are good get a deserved bonus in recognition of their skill and no-one gets anything OP to use against anyone else or reason not to go balls deep.

KBKB

Etaniel wrote: »

I think it would be more rewarding for PvPers if ZOS added killstreak bonuses in PvP like in Call Of Duty.

and...... that's where you lost me

MagnusRex

how about 20 kills for a swarm of swallows dropping coconuts:o

Lava_Croft

eliisra wrote: »

Please no, people already obsess about their kill/death ratio, for god knows what reason.

Because dying is bad. The fact that ESO more often than not rewards dying doesn't change this.

Cody

How about you give me 100K gold?

Sanct16

Sounds cool. Especially the nuclear bomb part.

Roechacca

I get where you're coming from and I too enjoy staying alive and seeing the kill counter rise but it is contradictory to the objective based pvp system already implemented . It would encourage more mass grouping because the system now gives credit for kills to people in group that may have contributed nothing more then being in the vicinity of a kill . That's a reason I usually stay ungrouped so that I can get a more accurate reading on the kill counter . It's not perfect as I can get credit even on assists .

RedTalon

Encouraging more laggers and zergings, I approve this idea?!?

Please ZOS no for the love of 8 don't do this or take this idea seriously

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

Too many people take the CoD reference troll literally. Some bonus from a 'killing blow' streak may actually be interesting to see implemented.

for example: 10 killing blows gives you a 5m + 5% AP buff. or a 'Minor Health' buff etc

Killing an emp may count as a unique reward. for example you restore all your health / stam / magicka

Iyas

No thanks

s7732425ub17_ESO

Actually, killstreaks should work the opposite.

Each kill you get should increase damage done to you by 3%. So if you kill 10 players in a row, you take 30% more damage from everything. This would eliminate unkillable zergs and perma-tanks without having to mess up the block mechanics (which is the route 1.6 takes). Good players would be able to rack up tons of kills and boast about their killstreak, while newer players would have some chance of killing them eventually (unlike now).

KBKB

s7732425ub17_ESO wrote: »

Actually, killstreaks should work the opposite.

Each kill you get should increase damage done to you by 3%. So if you kill 10 players in a row, you take 30% more damage from everything. This would eliminate unkillable zergs and perma-tanks without having to mess up the block mechanics (which is the route 1.6 takes). Good players would be able to rack up tons of kills and boast about their killstreak, while newer players would have some chance of killing them eventually (unlike now).

I see the logic, but I hate it.

Etaniel

/sarcasm off

Man I didn't think such an obvious bait would pull so many of you #FaithInEsoPlayersCompletelyLost

/sarcasm on

We could also look into adding some kind of rocket launcher to give ranged players the opportunity to destroy siege weapons from a safe distance

Juraigr

Loool people are dumb I'm sad now, also my sorc looked super cool in your vid etan

Juraigr

Random repost

Roechacca

Etaniel wrote: »

/sarcasm off

Man I didn't think such an obvious bait would pull so many of you #FaithInEsoPlayersCompletelyLost

/sarcasm on

We could also look into adding some kind of rocket launcher to give ranged players the opportunity to destroy siege weapons from a safe distance

Some of Us enjoy being trolled . You ever stop to consider we play along ?

Personal anti siege is a great suggestion . Maybe like Molotov Coctails and Fire arrows could be implemented . I'm pretty sure NPC's already have a oil and light it up ability in pve . Adding this to players to stop siege from a distance would be a great group mechanic and encourage more bow skills to assist . I for one am all for more bow choice content .

Etaniel

roechacca wrote: »

Etaniel wrote: »

/sarcasm off

Man I didn't think such an obvious bait would pull so many of you #FaithInEsoPlayersCompletelyLost

/sarcasm on

We could also look into adding some kind of rocket launcher to give ranged players the opportunity to destroy siege weapons from a safe distance

Some of Us enjoy being trolled . You ever stop to consider we play along ?

I didn't name any one, because i know (thank god) that there are still (a few) people capable of thinking around here

Roechacca

Etaniel wrote: »

roechacca wrote: »

Etaniel wrote: »

/sarcasm off

Man I didn't think such an obvious bait would pull so many of you #FaithInEsoPlayersCompletelyLost

/sarcasm on

We could also look into adding some kind of rocket launcher to give ranged players the opportunity to destroy siege weapons from a safe distance

Some of Us enjoy being trolled . You ever stop to consider we play along ?

I didn't name any one, because i know (thank god) that there are still (a few) people capable of thinking around here

But what about my Molotov Coctail idea ?

*shatter* "Light it UP !" pew pew

Junipus

Etaniel wrote: »

/sarcasm off

Man I didn't think such an obvious bait would pull so many of you #FaithInEsoPlayersCompletelyLost

/sarcasm on

We could also look into adding some kind of rocket launcher to give ranged players the opportunity to destroy siege weapons from a safe distance

Pfft. That's a crap idea.

I vote for T-rexs with head mounted lasers for both bow ganking and as mounts

WRX

I personally think a 3rd morph to batswarm, called "Fire Bats", that will generate ultimate when hitting anyone and do atleast 5X the damage.

Also buffs all other fire damage by 100%.

DisgracefulMind

Lawl so many fell for this XD

bertenburnyb16_ESO

lol dem CoD kids,
wrong game son

ToRelax

s7732425ub17_ESO wrote: »

Actually, killstreaks should work the opposite.

Each kill you get should increase damage done to you by 3%. So if you kill 10 players in a row, you take 30% more damage from everything. This would eliminate unkillable zergs and perma-tanks without having to mess up the block mechanics (which is the route 1.6 takes). Good players would be able to rack up tons of kills and boast about their killstreak, while newer players would have some chance of killing them eventually (unlike now).

Because if someone is more successful than most he must be cheating or exploiting, so skill must be punished in general!

WarrioroftheWind_ESO

Magus wrote: »

There are no reasons to encourage even more balling up and/or ganking in stealth. People are already terrified of dying in the game, it's almost a comical level.

That made me spittake because I know a AD player who has mastered the art of escaping death, and that makes killing him all the more satisfying.

Everyone dies in pvp. Better imo to run in swinging than run away like a sissy.

Teargrants

WarrioroftheWind_ESO wrote: »

Everyone dies in pvp. Better imo to run in swinging than run away like a sissy.

We need more ppl who think like you. No cereally, I need some meat shields to distract the zerg while I blinky blink into the sunset. =\

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO

All players who blink 4 times in the space of 30 seconds should instantly die to a slaughterfish tornado.

Teargrants

Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »

All players who blink 4 times in the space of 30 seconds should instantly die to a slaughterfish tornado.

May I also know which directions I'm allowed to blink in so I don't break your terms of engagement?