Wabbjack DC- much dissapoint WoW

Gaettusk

That exploiting to get into the wayshrine area of EP was bad enough, but to do a scroll run after exploiting into the spawn area? That's the lowest I've ever seen any faction go. Congrats

SienneYviete

Is there not 10 other threads regarding this already?

Aeradon

What they've done is bad. DC has it's fair share of spoilt milk.

But same goes to EP and AD. Grouping up to take down DC keeps? AD break walls, zerg in kill all, leave immediately and EP small group takes flag 2 seconds after? Standing side by side with each other groups and not attacking? Placing DC alt spies that follows our group around? DC spies that pulls enemy into keep? AP exploits and emperor swapping?

Scouts patrol around to feed us info, people talk on zone. Don't you for one second think that your alliance is all glory and just.

Rylana

Aeradon wrote: »

What they've done is bad. DC has it's fair share of spoilt milk.

But same goes to EP and AD. Grouping up to take down DC keeps? AD break walls, zerg in kill all, leave immediately and EP small group takes flag 2 seconds after? Standing side by side with each other groups and not attacking? Placing DC alt spies that follows our group around? DC spies that pulls enemy into keep? AP exploits and emperor swapping?

Scouts patrol around to feed us info, people talk on zone. Don't you for one second think that your alliance is all glory and just.

The difference is EP/AD in your example did so within the rules of the game. As a dev has stated before, temporary alliances can happen.

What DC is doing tonight is a blatant violation of the terms of service.

SienneYviete

You do realize that AD have been doing this on AB all night as well don't you?

Tintinabula

Seriously, I expected this from AD with all their hide and seek tactics with the scroll and all. I didn't expect this from DC.

DC has hit a new low..they've reset the bar actually.

Rylana

Eldhaaril wrote: »

You do realize that AD have been doing this on AB all night as well don't you?

So ban those responsible as well. Just because I primarily play as AD doesnt make me a hypocrite about this.

I said in another post to ban everyone from all three factions if they are continuing to do so.

Aeradon

Rylana wrote: »

Aeradon wrote: »

What they've done is bad. DC has it's fair share of spoilt milk.

But same goes to EP and AD. Grouping up to take down DC keeps? AD break walls, zerg in kill all, leave immediately and EP small group takes flag 2 seconds after? Standing side by side with each other groups and not attacking? Placing DC alt spies that follows our group around? DC spies that pulls enemy into keep? AP exploits and emperor swapping?

Scouts patrol around to feed us info, people talk on zone. Don't you for one second think that your alliance is all glory and just.

The difference is EP/AD in your example did so within the rules of the game. As a dev has stated before, temporary alliances can happen.

What DC is doing tonight is a blatant violation of the terms of service.

So the AP exploits are supposed to happen. Placing spies that pulls enemy into keeps are a part of our gameplay. Not forgetting the exploit to overpopulate the campaign.

It's ok, we have already acknowledged that as a part of our game.

The main difference in our examples is that all EP and AD did has won them emperorship and the campaign. What DC did was just AP farming and in no way affects the campaign's end results.

Rylana

Aeradon wrote: »

Rylana wrote: »

Aeradon wrote: »

What they've done is bad. DC has it's fair share of spoilt milk.

But same goes to EP and AD. Grouping up to take down DC keeps? AD break walls, zerg in kill all, leave immediately and EP small group takes flag 2 seconds after? Standing side by side with each other groups and not attacking? Placing DC alt spies that follows our group around? DC spies that pulls enemy into keep? AP exploits and emperor swapping?

Scouts patrol around to feed us info, people talk on zone. Don't you for one second think that your alliance is all glory and just.

The difference is EP/AD in your example did so within the rules of the game. As a dev has stated before, temporary alliances can happen.

What DC is doing tonight is a blatant violation of the terms of service.

So the AP exploits are supposed to happen. Placing spies that pulls enemy into keeps are a part of our gameplay. Not forgetting the exploit to overpopulate the campaign.

It's ok, we have already acknowledged that as a part of our game.

The main difference in our examples is that all EP and AD did has won them emperorship and the campaign. What DC did was just AP farming and in no way affects the campaign's end results.

The chain issue is its own issue. If two factions both attack a keep to knock the third faction off of it, so what? Thats my point, and thats why its a three way war.

I dont support emp swapping, never have, never will. But that isnt even comparable to what is happening right now.