Permafrost wrote: »You guys lose to us 8 v 16+, not sure how you expect to win an even fight against the Devs. You should try to replicate the circumstances when you beat us: make it 4-6 v 16 when you're inside a keep with your guards and siege. That would be interesting.
That should be @the OPWideglide007 wrote: »Permafrost wrote: »You guys lose to us 8 v 16+, not sure how you expect to win an even fight against the Devs. You should try to replicate the circumstances when you beat us: make it 4-6 v 16 when you're inside a keep with your guards and siege. That would be interesting.
flex that e peen lol
Permafrost wrote: »You guys lose to us 8 v 16+, not sure how you expect to win an even fight against the Devs. You should try to replicate the circumstances when you beat us: make it 4-6 v 16 when you're inside a keep with your guards and siege. That would be interesting.
Permafrost wrote: »[snip] has already admitted the statistics back it up. We've posted screen shots of our K/D against you which in simplest terms is about 9/10-1 and in real numbers is now in the neighborhood of 45/50-5.
[Moderator Note: Edited/Removed moderated quote]
Permafrost wrote: »You guys lose to us 8 v 16+, not sure how you expect to win an even fight against the Devs.
Permafrost wrote: »1. Don't murder the English language in my presence and expect me not to correct you. It's *literally* my job. I don't accept that garbage in any medium.
2. I actually would appreciate it if you don't talk to me--or anyone else--about guild vs. guild, because your crew certainly doesn't know anything about it.
will you, and the guy you are arguing with, shut the heck up? this is not the thread for your petty guild and grammar wars.Permafrost wrote: »1. Don't murder the English language in my presence and expect me not to correct you. It's *literally* my job. I don't accept that garbage in any medium.
2. I actually would appreciate it if you don't talk to me--or anyone else--about guild vs. guild, because your crew certainly doesn't know anything about it.
Actually, the content of your message involved two points: grammar and the statement that you are done responding to me, because you refuse to accept statistics of a 3rd party app even though it's the only unbiased measure. (I could just say "you guys are terrible and shouldn't throw out challenges to brain-dead vegetables let alone the developers" but that would be a petty insult without any corroborating evidence, even if it might be true). Thus, my two point response perfectly responded to the content of that message.kenpachi480 wrote: »expected response. QQ about grammar so you dont have to respond to the content thats been said.
I would much rather they fix the issues in Cyrodiil then play a guild no one has heard of on an unknown campaign.
Because, ya know, that's why we pay them a subscription? To fix and maintain the game... not so you can fight them.
Why don't you come to Wabbajack and fight some other people so Permafrost can stop trolling every thread where someone he has fought has lost.
Cool story! A bit presumptuous. I would guess random fan boy.If you haven't heard of order of shadow than you are either zerg or blow in pvp. They've been around in several games for over a decade.
This is so funny. Luckily he's not the one challenging the devskenpachi480 wrote: »Permafrost wrote: »You guys lose to us 8 v 16+, not sure how you expect to win an even fight against the Devs. You should try to replicate the circumstances when you beat us: make it 4-6 v 16 when you're inside a keep with your guards and siege. That would be interesting.
and you are?
if we cant beat you with 16 people vs 8 people your 100% cheating
mind before you respond. Exploiting is also cheating