Slaughterfish in AvA - Should they be removed from rivers

Kiljaz

I completely understand putting Slaughterfish in the water on the edges of the map, but I find it bad game design to put them in rivers. Especially when they attack some people and not others. You run into situations where someone you're chasing crosses the river and when you follow you get swarmed by Slaughterfish and they get free AP... This is a very poor design in my opinion.

Some_Jerk

Remove Slaughterfish from rivers.

I signed in just to vote on this. Would be so cool if you could cross rivers and swim in AvA

Hakurei

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

if you chase someone that went in the water first, you had to kill him when he was still in the water or he will kill you when you follow, simple.

Nijjion

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Slaughtfish in rivers serve a purpose of forcing people over the bridges which I actually like.

galiumb16_ESO

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

Dudis

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Nijjion wrote: »

Slaughtfish in rivers serve a purpose of forcing people over the bridges which I actually like.

This.

SwampRaider

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

galiumb16_ESO wrote: »

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

this

Ashlynne

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

galiumb16_ESO wrote: »

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

This indeed.

Censorious

Ashlynne wrote: »

galiumb16_ESO wrote: »

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

This indeed.

Not only that. The SF are useful to kill yourself if you get bugged - or just want to get back to the keep in a hurry.

Dleatherus

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

each alliance is separated by design, from the other alliances, by an impenetrable barrier that has 3 choke points to promote PvP encounters, set up ambushes for folks running scrolls, gank spots etc

EP/DC are mountains/walls with 3 gates

DC/AD are mountains/walls with 3 gates

AD/EP is a slaughterfish river with 3 bridges that have seen some of the most epic PvP in the game

the slaughterfish STAY

D.

Huckdabuck

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

I love getting the slaughtered cheevo (I think that's what it's called at least) the first time I went into the river. WTF is hitting me....oh hell.....can't swim out fast enough....damn I'm a derp.

NordJitsu

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

NO!!!!!

Seriously!?!?!?!


They aren't in all rivers, just the one's you aren't supposed to be able to cross. Its to force you into using the bridges so they can be PvP choke points.

Hadria

Haha of all things to get asked to remove

Ragnar_Lodbrok

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

I dont think there are enough slaughterfish. If you played ANY es game you know they are in EVERY waterway.

dahl.lucas_ESO

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

I think they need even MORE slaughter fish. Let it rain slaughter fish!!!

Kiljaz

Remove Slaughterfish from rivers.

galiumb16_ESO wrote: »

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

It's a poll, and as I said my opinion. It's not a complaint, I was asking others opinions to see what people thought. Obviously people do not agree with me and that's fine.

Although it's funny to see how people respond on forums with such little integrity.

Armitas

I didn't see an option for slaughter fish keep moats or slaughter fish tiger traps.

Snit

Make Argonians take half-damage from slaughterfish, and you have some interesting possibilities

nukeyoo

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Kiljaz wrote: »

galiumb16_ESO wrote: »

Of all the things wrong in the game, slaughterfish is what you feel you need to complain about?

It's a poll, and as I said my opinion. It's not a complaint, I was asking others opinions to see what people thought. Obviously people do not agree with me and that's fine.

Although it's funny to see how people respond on forums with such little integrity.

Kiljaz wrote: »

I find it bad game design to put them in rivers. This is a very poor design in my opinion.

com·plaint
kəmˈplānt
noun
1.a statement that a situation is unsatisfactory or unacceptable.
"I intend to make an official complaint on the forums with a poll then say its not a complaint."

It's funny to see how trivial peoples compl....err "opinions" can be... I hate to break it to you but if you're looking for integrity on the forums. You've come to the wrong place.

Kewljag_66_ESO

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Slaughter fish are basically there to force you to use the bridges, They work in teh same sense as the cliff walls that only allow you to use the gates. This is fo rth purpose of choke points between the 3 alliances territories

Blackhorne

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

The primary purpose of slaughterfish in every Elder Scrolls game is to surprise, annoy, and possibly kill the player.

AryaWythers

Slaughterfish placement is fine how it is.

Bow down to the slaughterfish!