It's on the Internets so it's true!nerevarine1138 wrote: »From the article:
"It's not explicitly clear where the figure comes from..."
Yeah. That sounds reliable.
It's on the Internets so it's true!nerevarine1138 wrote: »From the article:
"It's not explicitly clear where the figure comes from..."
Yeah. That sounds reliable.
AlexDougherty wrote: »It's on the Internets so it's true!nerevarine1138 wrote: »From the article:
"It's not explicitly clear where the figure comes from..."
Yeah. That sounds reliable.
According to the Internet I'm a structural engineer from south America, or at least that's what it told me fifteen years ago.
(In case it isn't clear, I'm neither)
For a AAA game, that is bad. really bad.
Take into account a lot of those will be the 3 month subs peeps bought and have already bailed on the game.
The suit's will already be putting together their get out plans which usually consists of a large quick cash grab.
Anything below 1m for AAA game is a VERY bad thing for the gamers also as it means no Investment will be coming from the bean pushers.
UO still has 300k subs.....it's 17 years old now and run from basically a large house. A 3 month old game with 750k? *holds head in shame*
nerevarine1138 wrote: »From the article:
"It's not explicitly clear where the figure comes from..."
nerevarine1138 wrote: »From the article:
"It's not explicitly clear where the figure comes from..."
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »For a AAA game, that is bad. really bad.
Take into account a lot of those will be the 3 month subs peeps bought and have already bailed on the game.
The suit's will already be putting together their get out plans which usually consists of a large quick cash grab.
Anything below 1m for AAA game is a VERY bad thing for the gamers also as it means no Investment will be coming from the bean pushers.
UO still has 300k subs.....it's 17 years old now and run from basically a large house. A 3 month old game with 750k? *holds head in shame*
Actually its not that bad. FF14 released on PC PS3 and PS4 and has around 400-500k subs and considered a huge success.
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »For a AAA game, that is bad. really bad.
Take into account a lot of those will be the 3 month subs peeps bought and have already bailed on the game.
The suit's will already be putting together their get out plans which usually consists of a large quick cash grab.
Anything below 1m for AAA game is a VERY bad thing for the gamers also as it means no Investment will be coming from the bean pushers.
UO still has 300k subs.....it's 17 years old now and run from basically a large house. A 3 month old game with 750k? *holds head in shame*
Actually its not that bad. FF14 released on PC PS3 and PS4 and has around 400-500k subs and considered a huge success.
Agreed. If ESO was in the ballpark of 775k subs then I would consider it in an incredibly healthy position.
purple-magicb16_ESO wrote: »I don't understand. Is that good or bad?
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »For a AAA game, that is bad. really bad.
Take into account a lot of those will be the 3 month subs peeps bought and have already bailed on the game.
The suit's will already be putting together their get out plans which usually consists of a large quick cash grab.
Anything below 1m for AAA game is a VERY bad thing for the gamers also as it means no Investment will be coming from the bean pushers.
UO still has 300k subs.....it's 17 years old now and run from basically a large house. A 3 month old game with 750k? *holds head in shame*
Actually its not that bad. FF14 released on PC PS3 and PS4 and has around 400-500k subs and considered a huge success.