Again. The set was specifically created to not give cc immunity. It was purposely meant to ignore that. So it is not objectively broken. It is only broken in how you wish it to be.
"It was designed to work this way, so it isn't broken/overpeforming" simply does not hold up whatsoever when compared to historical examples in eso. Maras balm on release was working exactly as intended. It was objectively broken/overperforming. Sloads on release was working exactly as intended. It was objectively…
Rush of Agony does have an immunity but only by the player that used Rush of Agony. So if you get 2-3 players using Rush it can result in multiple pulls. Game balance in ESO is a joke at the moment given how broken gear sets are, classes, etc...
Who exactly do you think decided it was a good idea to make a set like this? Do you think it was someone who frequently pvps, and who understands the nuances of PVP? Or do you think it was the same developers responsible for the absolute mess we've had in pvp for years? My guess is the latter. The truth is that nobody with…