I'm very confused as to what you're saying.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »There is currently an open ticket, it is a very serious privacy issue, that is present within this very thread. And many others in these forums. It's a challenge waiting 10-30 days for this to be corrected. I can't believe there's no security analyst that said "um hey guys? maybe you shouldn't put personally identifiable information on the forums for all to see without the customers approval!." Need a referral to a highly trained security analyst? I can give you dozens I can assure you they wouldn't let this go unnoticed.
Just wait until they answer your ticket.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »The details are in the ticket for the mods, I can tell you now you aren't affected @Acsvf this is an issue affecting people who joined the forums during closed beta, and has still not been resolved. If I go into more detail I would leave myself and every other affected user vulnerable. I would rather this be taken care of quietly, and not be ignored indefinitely.
For Admins the ticket number is 160210-001196
JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO ✭
About
Username JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO Joined November 2013 Visits 5 Last Active 1:23AM Roles No Roles Points 23 Badges 5 Platform Multiple
So wait for a response to your ticket.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »They took a separate bit of account info and used that instead of asking people to create their user names, then randomly propagated that private account information out. After closed beta any user who's using the forums for the first time SHOULD be asked to create a forum name, or use the user name already active on their accounts. That's how every other company out there would have handled the situation. This effects everyone that was in closed beta that has not yet asked to have this changed, and waited 10-30 days for a correction to be made.
I would prefer if you did not raise issues about points I have never made.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »@Acsvf you're right, no one should say anything about this. in fact maybe everyone else's information should be made public too. Lets live in a world where you're information should be shared and if you raise concerns about it its ignored for months on end and you have to listen to some kid troll you and tell you its no big deal because it doesn't affect him.
So wait for a response to your ticket.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »They took a separate bit of account info and used that instead of asking people to create their user names, then randomly propagated that private account information out. After closed beta any user who's using the forums for the first time SHOULD be asked to create a forum name, or use the user name already active on their accounts. That's how every other company out there would have handled the situation. This effects everyone that was in closed beta that has not yet asked to have this changed, and waited 10-30 days for a correction to be made.
Again, what do you think your thread is going to do?
Yes.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »Would you prefer if I raise issue with a point you did make?
No, it was not.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »If you're insinuation was it doesn't affect you so I shouldn't speak
I have made neither of those points.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »So insinuating that speaking in a public forum is useless as Staff doesn't listen to it, and shouldn't happen because you don't want to hear it is neither constructive, nor helpful.
No, it is not.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »Then you're point is I have every right to be here speaking about this topic. is that correct?
Again, a point I have not made. I've never said that you shouldn't speak in a public forum.JBG.ITTMANb14_ESO wrote: »What is the constructive purpose of trying to prevent someone from speaking in a public forum?