Maintenance for the week of December 22:
• [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – December 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – December 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)

Should Rajhin be nerfed?

BloodRedHurricane
BloodRedHurricane
✭✭✭
3 Golds to use Rajhin's effect is too low. I believe it should be 5.
  • Northwold
    Northwold
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I think the patron should be nerfed, yes. It's too cheap. But a lot of people seem to want the entire deck nerfed on the basis that they don't like Tot and want matches over as quickly as possible, which is a pretty weird way to look at gameplay changes. The deck is one of the few that facilitates a different play style than a mindless race to 40 and so makes ToT an actual game rather than a random card draw exercise.
    Edited by Northwold on December 21, 2025 12:05PM
  • CoronHR
    CoronHR
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    i would agree that the patron should be more expensive if it's already turned your direction, and always a minimum of 3

    i don't like this deck for the reasons that @Northwold has described. it extends the match and can sometimes make an absolute mess of it. but it does facilitate a different play style -- that is surely accurate. i imagine the reason players want the matches over faster is because they're not that fun and too long as it is. that's my sentiment at least
    PC - EU - Steam client
  • GeneralGrundmann
    GeneralGrundmann
    ✭✭✭
    Rajhin is the reason I always choose Red Eagle and Hermaeus.
  • Munkfist
    Munkfist
    ✭✭✭✭
    Rahjin is also an amazing counter to the Red Eagle/Crow that everyone seems to rely on.

    Rahjin is my go-to deck for random queue ToT for that reason, though rarely do I play the Patron itself unless RNG is just handing out the birds nonstop. I wouldn't be opposed to an increased Patron cost.
    @Munkfist PC-NA
    The Devoted Torchbugs
    Antiquarian's Alpine Gallery Guildhall - Feel free to use!
    If your guild needs a crafthall, please feel free to reach out!
  • spartaxoxo
    spartaxoxo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, the patron effect should be nerfed. As should Grand Larceny/Pounce.
    Edited by spartaxoxo on December 22, 2025 6:02AM
  • AnduinTryggva
    AnduinTryggva
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Northwold wrote: »
    I think the patron should be nerfed, yes. It's too cheap. But a lot of people seem to want the entire deck nerfed on the basis that they don't like Tot and want matches over as quickly as possible, which is a pretty weird way to look at gameplay changes. The deck is one of the few that facilitates a different play style than a mindless race to 40 and so makes ToT an actual game rather than a random card draw exercise.

    Actually Rhajin is not such a bad deck even when playing against it but I absolutely agree that the patron needs to be nerfed. Costs of re-applyig Rhajin patron already in favored position should cost minimum 4g. 3g is faaaar to cheap.

    Also the 5g awarding cards are too powerfull. They should be either 6g cost or get nerfed.

    The rest is pretty fine.
Sign In or Register to comment.