Jman100582 wrote: »Really? a monster set that only gives 5% dmg? This set will be completely worthless next patch. 1 kena 1 balorgh will give more or less the same dps, but also give increased healing
An easy fix would be just to buff it up to major berserk. 10% at all times is fair, it's equal to 5 pieces like essence thief and other dmg sets. Ever since they started trying to standardize monster sets with 5 piece sets some have been left in the dust and just ignored. Sets such as slimecraw, grundwulf, spawn of mephala, and swarm mother haven't been well standardized.
goldenarcher1 wrote: »Camo-hunter facing the same nerf.
If major berserrk is to Much... 5% damage as unique buff (can stack with minor berserk) ?
oscarovegren wrote: »Slimecraw is already outperforming other monstersets today IF there is no source or minor berserk. So a unique 8% buff would make it BiS on spot. A unique 5% however should be balanced
Ending up with just a 5% buff will kill this set. I don't think that it especially outperforms other sets as it is.
If ZOS is trying to balance and standardize buffs/debuffs then hopefully they have spotted that this will affect some sets where the bonus refers to a specific buff.
Also: I haven't been playing ESO as long as others no doubt but I am already getting a bit frustrated with the changes they keep making to sets. If this change to Slimecraw goes through then this will be the third set that I will have to re-grind/replace because of the changes ZOS is making.
If ZOS is trying to balance and standardize buffs/debuffs...
If ZOS is trying to balance and standardize buffs/debuffs...
They are not trying to balance or standardize...they are trying to reduce damage done and increase damage taken. They took at hammer to major/minors because it is the easiest way to do that. It puts every set bonus, class/weapon passive, cp bonus completely out of whack, but what the hey.
How that benefits "unoptimized groups" and punishes "optimized groups" is beyond me. The content, which was scaled to the pre-nerf capabilities, stays the same. So it will just be harder for unoptimized groups, period, with no way to become "optimized".