Maintenance for the week of December 23:
• NA megaservers for maintenance – December 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – December 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 14:00 UTC (9:00AM EST)
• NA megaservers for maintenance – December 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – December 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 14:00 UTC (9:00AM EST)
The colour of the day is.... Blue
Lovenest
✭✭
So it seems there's been a slick change in the quality of crate drops. We opened a lot of Nightfall crates and oddly enough, blue was the colour of the day. The levels of crate rewards has changed so that previous blue items are now purple, purple items are now gold and to obtain a mount, you must get a RED card. You've made it harder to get any kind of good rewards. I bought less of the Psijic crates and scored 3 motif pages just from those. This is in no way buyers remorse as I knew what I was buying and the RNG that is involved. But there is a clear difference in the structure of crates now and its very noticeable.
6
-
volkeswagon✭✭✭✭✭
✭crates aren't worth the money anyway. I've learned to have crates gifted now and to save my own crowns for houses and costumes etc.3 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭scientifically proven that humans influence random number generators. Also for more proof check out the double slit experiment. You're welcome.2
-
BisDasBlutGefriert✭✭✭✭✭By the color blue being a more higher rarity color/tier than white, it tricks your mind into thinking, "hey that's a blue one, that's not bad". When those exact same cards were regular white common cards, your mind went, "crap, just a white one".
So what it's doing is tricking your brain into thinking, "hey, I won!" over and over again, triggering a sense of elation, in not getting screwed. It's just a selling tactic is all.
Another similar example;
You go to a casino, head up to the slot machines and sit down. Each time you hit the exquisite looking "SPIN" button on the screen, it costs you one dollar. So, you put one dollar in and hit that spin button. What happens?
1dollar = 100¢
The machine starts flashing lines and fruits, or Greek gods, or whatever, and says "YOU WON". Looking at the amount, you won 36¢.
Okay here's a question for you;
Did you see it as winning 36¢, or did you see it at losing 64¢ out of that one dollar it just cost you?
I see it as losing that much money. Which is why I stay out of casinos and far away from crown crates. Even with 30k crowns. It's all just tricks.Edited by BisDasBlutGefriert on July 31, 2020 10:41AM~There’s a positive in every negative. Sometimes the positive is harder to find than other times, but there is ALWAYS one there~4 -
Ectheliontnacil✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »scientifically proven that humans influence random number generators. Also for more proof check out the double slit experiment. You're welcome.
@Spartabunny08 What do you mean by that? If you really are suggesting that you can consciously influence random number generators or any other real world outcome using nothing but your mental abilities, then nothing has been "scientifically" proven.
Also what does the double slit experiment have to do with this pseudoscience?
Don't want to put words in your mouth though, perhaps you meant to say something else. I do not deny that a human can influence a random number generator physically, for example by smashing it to pieces. ^^
4 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.Edited by Spartabunny08 on July 31, 2020 6:50PM1 -
VoxAdActa✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.1 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...0 -
VoxAdActa✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.1 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.
He's the father of quantum physics. Not ESP and yes all non matter is included. Your name calling means nothing. You think you can dismiss me because you use specific words that let you seem to think have some kind of an authority. Doesn't work that way. That's the same as saying conspiracy theorist to deny anyone an actual intellectual debate. The CIA made that up too or is it you can't handle the truth.
Maybe if you actually looked you may learn something but with that attitude probably not because it does require an open mind.
I'm sorry your not intelligent enough to make further connections beyond just 1 step but I believe in you you can do better.0 -
VoxAdActa✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.
He's the father of quantum physics. Not ESP and yes all non matter is included. Your name calling means nothing. You think you can dismiss me because you use specific words that let you seem to think have some kind of an authority. Doesn't work that way. That's the same as saying conspiracy theorist to deny anyone an actual intellectual debate. The CIA made that up too or is it you can't handle the truth.
Maybe if you actually looked you may learn something but with that attitude probably not because it does require an open mind.
I'm sorry your not intelligent enough to make further connections beyond just 1 step but I believe in you you can do better.
lol, nah.
Proof or gtfo.1 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.
He said in conclusion there is no such thing as matter and when you look into atoms and whatnot they're mostly empty space.
All of what we call matter can fit inside the size of a pea.
Does this clear things up for you?0 -
VoxAdActa✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.
He said in conclusion there is no such thing as matter and when you look into atoms and whatnot they're mostly empty space.
All of what we call matter can fit inside the size of a pea.
Does this clear things up for you?
lol, nah.
Proof or GTFO.1 -
Spartabunny08✭✭✭✭Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »Spartabunny08 wrote: »The double slit experiment is hardly pseudoscience. It's quantum physics. Wow do you have some stuff to learn.
Why are people who don't know something immediately run to "pseudoscience" like wtf?
I said look it up. Yes it is Real. Yes you do use your mind. Whoa too much for you well that’s why it won't work for you but it does against you.
Learn. This is for you I'm well past this. How many perfect Roe you've gotten in a row? Used this to do it.
Belief even from a doctors prescription out of their mouth they say 33%of the patient getting better is them believing in it. So yeah i meant exactly this.
Try and help some people.
What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.
I'll put that into smaller words for you: lol, nah.
Awesome. So Max Plank is wrong got it...
Max Plank didn't say *** about ESP and crown crates; your YouTube Ph.D doesn't mean nothing to sane people, Dr. Google.
He said in conclusion there is no such thing as matter and when you look into atoms and whatnot they're mostly empty space.
All of what we call matter can fit inside the size of a pea.
Does this clear things up for you?
lol, nah.
Proof or GTFO.
How about you GTFO... I plainly stated inform yourself. Take it or leave it. You have no business here.0 -
VoxAdActa✭✭✭✭Here's my proof: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872141/There remains doubt among the scientific community on the existence of micro-PK given: (i) the small and heterogenous effect; and (ii) the fact that several independent replication attempts of prominent studies failed to confirm the original results. The study presented here was intended to provide decisive evidence for or against the existence of micro-PK. An online experiment with 12,571 participants was conducted. The Bayesian analysis revealed strong evidence for H0 (BF01 = 10.07). Thus, micro-PK did not exist in the data.
Your turn.
Prove it or gtfo.1 -
Psiion✭✭✭✭Greetings,
Seeing as this thread has derailed into Flaming, it has been closed. Flaming, as stated below, is against the Forum Rules and is non-constructive.
Please keep in mind the Forum Rules when posting, which can be found in full here.Flaming: It’s okay to disagree and debate on the official ESO forums, but we do ask that you keep all disagreements civil, constructive, and on-topic. If a discussion gets heated and turns into a debate, remember that you should stick to debating the post and/or thread topic. It is never appropriate to resort to personal comments or jabs about those participating in the thread discussion.0
This discussion has been closed.