Maintenance for the week of October 12:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – October 12, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) – 8:00AM EDT (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox One: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – October 14, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) – 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®4: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – October 14, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) – 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
The Markarth DLC and Update 28 base game patch are now available to test on the PTS! Read the full patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/categories/pts/

ESO Logs: Invasive or Useful?

  • MLGProPlayer
    MLGProPlayer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Useful
    Neyane wrote: »
    You want it? Fine. You use it? Fine. You force me to use it? Bye f**king bye.

    I play the game for fun, believe it or not, I have no time for elitism in this game.

    You don't have to use it. You can turn off data sharing.
  • Alucardo
    Alucardo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Alucardo wrote: »
    Uhm, I think I may have missed an important part of the news or something. Which logs? Without even knowing the situation, I'm not very keen on anything that collects data, unless you can completely opt out of it.
    I think it's fine if people are okay with it, and want to send data to help improve a service. But you MUST be able to disable it if you wish.


    This is yesterday stream. Skip to the part where they talk about ESO Logs.

    Ah cool, thanks. It's not what I thought it was going to be.
    (sqweee )>--- ۜ\(סּںסּَ` )/ۜ
  • MLGProPlayer
    MLGProPlayer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Useful
    Tyrobag wrote: »
    DenMoria wrote: »
    Tyrobag wrote: »
    DenMoria wrote: »
    Tyrobag wrote: »
    MissBizz wrote: »
    Useful. If you make yourself anonymous then the people seeing on the website won't know it's you

    And if people in your group know you're the only anonymous one and they are rude about it, let's be real, do you even want to play with them anyways? No.

    I'm very excited for our progression team who regularly takes cmx screenshots and makes spreadsheets to have this tool make our lives easier tho.

    It is impossible to play ESO without playing with elitists. If I refused to play with any group that had elitists in it I wouldn't be able to play trials.

    Good thing I don't do Trials.

    Which is great for you if you don't care about that content, but may of us like trials.

    Its not even that I personally expect to get much flack from this addition (my dps is reasonably good), but I know it will be misused to promote toxicity. I also don't like the idea of people looking at my data without my consent. Whats next, the ability to check someone's gear/ability set up? Their rotation? If I want you to know these things I'd tell you when you ask.

    Like I said in the poll.

    While I don't really want my DPS to be public knowledge usually, when it comes to group content, particularly for Trials, it could certainly serve a valuable purpose.

    Of course, it also opens up an awful lot of opportunities for abuse, but, hey, if you're doing trials and you're not qualified (which I'm not), maybe your teammates actually deserve to be warned, eh?

    Which is what a polite request for a dps parse is for.

    Some players post fake parses, or use cheese to inflate their DPS. In-content metrics are important to progression groups.
  • MLGProPlayer
    MLGProPlayer
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Useful
    FierceSam wrote: »
    FierceSam wrote: »
    You "opt in" by joining the group. That is your consent. Don't like other people seeing your stats? Join with friends only. If you're that worried about other people seeing exactly what you're doing don't worry. A group will already have a very good idea of your skills. This only adds a number to it.

    So wrong in so many ways.

    It should be MY choice whether ANYONE else, friend, guildmate, or pugger gets to see my numbers. This toxic system doesn’t even let me know they’re recording them.

    If I want you to know I will tell you.

    That's exactly how it works though.

    No it isn’t.

    Once activated by a single player, it secretly records all the data from your group irrespective of whether you ask or tell the others that you are doing this. It allows YOU to secretly view my performance without my permission and then do anything you want with my performance data.

    It neither informs me that this is being done, nor provides me with any way of viewing, amending or deleting my data.

    It then squirrels the data away on a third party website, allowing THEM to gather data on all players and do whatever they please with it.

    If that doesn’t worry you to some extent I politely suggest you haven’t thought it through.

    It doesn't let anyone view your performance if you are set to anonymous.
  • FleetwoodSmack
    FleetwoodSmack
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Invasive
    FierceSam wrote: »
    FierceSam wrote: »
    You "opt in" by joining the group. That is your consent. Don't like other people seeing your stats? Join with friends only. If you're that worried about other people seeing exactly what you're doing don't worry. A group will already have a very good idea of your skills. This only adds a number to it.

    So wrong in so many ways.

    It should be MY choice whether ANYONE else, friend, guildmate, or pugger gets to see my numbers. This toxic system doesn’t even let me know they’re recording them.

    If I want you to know I will tell you.

    That's exactly how it works though.

    No it isn’t.

    Once activated by a single player, it secretly records all the data from your group irrespective of whether you ask or tell the others that you are doing this. It allows YOU to secretly view my performance without my permission and then do anything you want with my performance data.

    It neither informs me that this is being done, nor provides me with any way of viewing, amending or deleting my data.

    It then squirrels the data away on a third party website, allowing THEM to gather data on all players and do whatever they please with it.

    If that doesn’t worry you to some extent I politely suggest you haven’t thought it through.

    I'll say this. If it doesn't have/track;
    • PvP areas
    • Set data
    • Resource regen

    I might be less against it. But since there's no confirmation either way (that I've seen and I'm not able to watch the stream atm)? Yeah, it's a nope.

    Note; Even if it doesn't track PvP areas, the other two I'm still noping on.
    Edited by FleetwoodSmack on April 13, 2019 11:53AM
    Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies!
  • Bc_bmx
    Bc_bmx
    ✭✭✭
    To be honest, I just want something like combat metrics on console... If this starts that process im all for it.
  • witchdoctor
    witchdoctor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    FierceSam wrote: »
    FierceSam wrote: »
    You "opt in" by joining the group. That is your consent. Don't like other people seeing your stats? Join with friends only. If you're that worried about other people seeing exactly what you're doing don't worry. A group will already have a very good idea of your skills. This only adds a number to it.

    So wrong in so many ways.

    It should be MY choice whether ANYONE else, friend, guildmate, or pugger gets to see my numbers. This toxic system doesn’t even let me know they’re recording them.

    If I want you to know I will tell you.

    That's exactly how it works though.

    No it isn’t.

    Once activated by a single player, it secretly records all the data from your group irrespective of whether you ask or tell the others that you are doing this. It allows YOU to secretly view my performance without my permission and then do anything you want with my performance data.

    It neither informs me that this is being done, nor provides me with any way of viewing, amending or deleting my data.

    It then squirrels the data away on a third party website, allowing THEM to gather data on all players and do whatever they please with it.

    If that doesn’t worry you to some extent I politely suggest you haven’t thought it through.

    It doesn't let anyone view your performance if you are set to anonymous.

    That is not the case.

    The data IS collected.

    Just the anonymous player's name is removed. Their performance is still collected.
  • Arciris
    Arciris
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Invasive
    Arciris wrote: »
    Gythral wrote: »
    More garbage taking up time and resources that could be deployed to FIX the real issues
    like the absolutely horrendous servers, support and communication instead of providing elitists with more muck to spread!

    I don't agree much with the wording but I do agree that this offers only a slight upgrade to already existing tools and will only be useful to a very small minority of people (not talking about forum people, forum people is already a minority population of people who care enough to be here), while raising legitimate concerns in a majority of other folks.

    I completely agree that the way the use of resources is prioritized seems really off, when breaking free, bar swapping and even skills firing (especially ultimates) are now RNG based and need an urgent fix - just to give a few examples that are affecting a very large number of people and impacting heavily their enjoyment of the game.

    Also, I don't see how this will improve Accessibility of harder content but i can definitely see how this new tool could lower that same Accessibility.

    Addressing the issue of Accessibility seems to go the same direction of "upping the floor/lowering the ceiling": result in the exact opposite of the original intent.

    It helps progression guilds progress. It will drastically increase accessibility.

    It doesn't affect casuals in any way, shape, or form so you statement of "while raising legitimate concerns in a majority of other folks" is complete nonsense.

    As I'm writing this post, the "Invasive" option collects 56% of the votes, so my statement is not non sense, it is fact.

    Maybe this will help some progression guilds for Trials, I never said otherwise, but what about Vet DLC dungeons?
    People are already afraid to even attempt them, even on normal, and with another tool to further intimidate them, I don't see how this will increase sales on those DLC's....
    At ZOS, they are probably brainstorming to find out what kind of "not-resource-heavy-to-produce" content they could use instead of Dungeons, because obviously those are not meeting their sale expectations and if their attempt to increase Accessibility on those fail, you can be sure they will drop the production of such content: is that what you want?

    Also, the main point of the argument was to question the choice of prioritizing the use of resources - however small- for the benefit of a very small percentage of the population over using those resources to help improve the gaming experience of a larger number of people.
  • ZOS_RogerJ
    ZOS_RogerJ
    admin
    Just a friendly reminder, as several comments have been removed or edited, to keep the thread on-topic, constructive and civil. Remember that it’s okay and very normal to disagree with others, and even to debate, but provoking conflict, baiting, inciting, mocking, etc. is never acceptable in the official The Elder Scrolls Online community. If you do not have something constructive or meaningful to add to a discussion, we strongly recommend you refrain from posting in that thread.
    The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited - ZeniMax Online Studios
    Forum Rules | Code of Conduct | Terms of Service | Home Page | Help Site
    Staff Post
  • Tyrobag
    Tyrobag
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Invasive
    FierceSam wrote: »
    FierceSam wrote: »
    You "opt in" by joining the group. That is your consent. Don't like other people seeing your stats? Join with friends only. If you're that worried about other people seeing exactly what you're doing don't worry. A group will already have a very good idea of your skills. This only adds a number to it.

    So wrong in so many ways.

    It should be MY choice whether ANYONE else, friend, guildmate, or pugger gets to see my numbers. This toxic system doesn’t even let me know they’re recording them.

    If I want you to know I will tell you.

    That's exactly how it works though.

    No it isn’t.

    Once activated by a single player, it secretly records all the data from your group irrespective of whether you ask or tell the others that you are doing this. It allows YOU to secretly view my performance without my permission and then do anything you want with my performance data.

    It neither informs me that this is being done, nor provides me with any way of viewing, amending or deleting my data.

    It then squirrels the data away on a third party website, allowing THEM to gather data on all players and do whatever they please with it.

    If that doesn’t worry you to some extent I politely suggest you haven’t thought it through.

    It doesn't let anyone view your performance if you are set to anonymous.

    Yes it does, this is the Exact problem. "Anonymous" mode only hides your name, it shares all other data. When they add the option to opt out of any data sharing there will no longer be an issue.

    From your posts its clear you hadn't understood that point. Hopefully you realize that with no way to stop others from collecting your data without consent, this is a pure invasion of privacy.

    Again, the one thing they need to add is an option to opt out entirely and show no data.
  • Suddwrath
    Suddwrath
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Useful
    I'm surprised by the number of people who genuinely believe this is more negative than it really is. This is not going to increase the toxicity which already exists in the game.

    This is going to be a beneficial tool for trials guilds. People aren't going to "ask to see your logs" in order to join a pug group as others have suggested. During the dungeon/trial the data cannot be seen in real-time. Only one person needs to run the logger (the raid lead) so it isn't like everyone is forced to run it.

    If people are so bothered by others requiring a certain DPS threshold for content then simply join a casual PvE guild. There are MANY of them. For example: Some guilds require 45-50k DPS for vMaw, whereas others only require 30-35k. So if you are currently in a guild which requires 50k parses, then simply look for a guild which has lower requirements. They exist. But you need to adjust your expectations accordingly. If you are only pulling 15k DPS then you cannot expect to join content which has mechanics which 1-shot the group if the DPS is not high enough.
    PC NA: CP 810+
    Xbox NA: CP 810+
    Closed beta
    | vMA Flawless | vDSA | vAA HM | vHRC HM | vSO HM | vMoL | vHoF | vAS+2 | vCR | vSS HM |
    | DK tank | Warden tank | NB tank | Templar healer | Warden healer | Magsorc | Magblade | Magplar | Crafter |
  • Suddwrath
    Suddwrath
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Useful
    Also, here is an excerpt from the ToS that everyone playing the game agreed to:

    "By creating an Account, You agree that You do not own the Account, any user names created on the Account, any Content stored or associated with an Account (such as digital and/or virtual assets, achievements, virtual currency, and other Downloadable Content), or related data associated with the Account."

    This is not YOUR data. You agreed to this the moment you accepted the ToS to play the game.
    PC NA: CP 810+
    Xbox NA: CP 810+
    Closed beta
    | vMA Flawless | vDSA | vAA HM | vHRC HM | vSO HM | vMoL | vHoF | vAS+2 | vCR | vSS HM |
    | DK tank | Warden tank | NB tank | Templar healer | Warden healer | Magsorc | Magblade | Magplar | Crafter |
  • Suddwrath
    Suddwrath
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Useful
    Arciris wrote: »
    As I'm writing this post, the "Invasive" option collects 56% of the votes, so my statement is not non sense, it is fact.

    You cannot determine the factuality of your statement from a poll on the forums. The users who took this poll are not an accurate representation of the total playerbase. First, the users who come to the forums generally do not reflect the overall playerbase. Second, the users who came to the forums to express their concerns and frustrations specifically for the new logging feature do not take into consideration the players who actually like the new feature (but they do not feel compelled to come to the forums to express that).

    tl;dr
    Player-generated forum polls don't hold very much weight.
    PC NA: CP 810+
    Xbox NA: CP 810+
    Closed beta
    | vMA Flawless | vDSA | vAA HM | vHRC HM | vSO HM | vMoL | vHoF | vAS+2 | vCR | vSS HM |
    | DK tank | Warden tank | NB tank | Templar healer | Warden healer | Magsorc | Magblade | Magplar | Crafter |
  • Suddwrath
    Suddwrath
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Useful
    Sorry, but your entire post shows that you have literally no idea of the life of an "average player" in ESO, nor of what's happening in what you call "casual guilds".

    And as for your other assumption as to how familiar I am with casual guilds: I am an officer in a large (400+) player PvE guild which does both casual and hardcore content. For our casual players we barely even have any requirements and we are more than helpful and patient with them. Those types of guilds DO exist. You just have to find them.
    Edited by Suddwrath on April 13, 2019 2:07PM
    PC NA: CP 810+
    Xbox NA: CP 810+
    Closed beta
    | vMA Flawless | vDSA | vAA HM | vHRC HM | vSO HM | vMoL | vHoF | vAS+2 | vCR | vSS HM |
    | DK tank | Warden tank | NB tank | Templar healer | Warden healer | Magsorc | Magblade | Magplar | Crafter |
  • idk
    idk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MissBizz wrote: »
    Useful. If you make yourself anonymous then the people seeing on the website won't know it's you

    And if people in your group know you're the only anonymous one and they are rude about it, let's be real, do you even want to play with them anyways? No.

    I'm very excited for our progression team who regularly takes cmx screenshots and makes spreadsheets to have this tool make our lives easier tho.

    I agree the tool is useful and a benefit to top raiding groups and those interested in improving their playstyle.

    However, we cannot truly opt out. We can only hide our name. It seems the website @Kihra built does not provide any more anonymity than the in game toggle does which mean players can figure out exactly who you are and everything you did even if you chose to be anonymous.

    Zos could have added a database field for all data that would be captured and buffs would be set to always pass through since that is required for analysis and damage data would be set to never pass through unless someone opted in.

    I hate to say it but the game is essentially powered by a large database and on the simplistic side that is exactly how a database works.
    Edited by idk on April 13, 2019 2:24PM
    Really, idk
  • anitajoneb17_ESO
    anitajoneb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Invasive
    SaltySudd wrote: »
    I have every idea of what it means to be casual.

    I didn't say "casual". I said "average".
    According to what you say, you went from "very bad" straight to "good", in a very short time, so you have no clue what the "average player" 's life is like ingame.

    What do you think of my suggestion in order to reconcile ppl for and against the "logger" ? Because that's the topic and that's what matters.

  • StormeReigns
    StormeReigns
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Invasive
    I picked invasive cause, there was no "Other" option.

    For progression, you need logs, simple as that. Here's the issue though. Before WoD, Warcraft Logs could be cheesed so hard by people attacking kill able critters (i.e: rats, bugs, etc.) And there used to be a lot of them in dungeons and raids, now, not a whole lot anymore.

    This fooled a lot of serious progressive raiding end game guilds, and caused a lot of unwarranted hate to casuals looking to up their game going into harder content. Now, if ESO logs are able to ignore these critters as "mobs" or ZOS just removes these critters so the logs dont get cheesed to oblivion and back, there will really be no issue at all.
This discussion has been closed.