MartiniDaniels wrote: »OP for you to understand the difference in scale. In TES3 there is city Ald'ruhn and there is city center Skar, body of dead crab. Amount of quests related to Redoran houses living in that crab is comparable to all ESO Vvardenfell content.
'First' impressions of TES 3 (its been over 10 years):
Great graphics for its time, still good enough for my tastes (except character models), and much improved with mods
Combat is super clunky, missing/failing 10 attacks/casts in a row due to RNG is bad, no magicka regen is a joke (theres a mod for that)
No way of knowing how tough something is until you attack it and die
No mounts, run speed is slow and burns stamina
Personally I don't think it's really worth playing in 2019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Whz-LQlbI-UThey seem better for ESO but I feel like Vvardenfell was a lot larger in TES 3
My TESO Imperial Nightblade has just arrived in Vvardenfell not too long ago and, as luck (or coincidence) would have it, Bethesda has given out free PC copies of TES III this week. As it's been a while since I've played TES III and haven't had my physical copy of it for a while, I downloaded it (who knew that Bethesda had its own launcher? Cool.).
I created a new TES III character and played a bit of it. There are definitely some differences between the two versions of Vvardenfell, the most glaringly obvious ones being the graphics and the UI. Some other, more subtle differences include the dominant Imperial presence on TES III's Vvardenfell as opposed to the dominant Dunmer presence on TESO's Vvardenfell, as well as that only the first-person perspective is available in TES III (which makes me wonder why I needed to create my character's look during character generation if I'm never going to see him), especially after being used to playing my TESO character exclusively in third person.
Still, it's so weird seeing the world's graphics having severely declined over 400(?) years. It's like trying to wrap my head around how much more advanced the technology (i.e. special effects and set design) is in Star Trek: Discovery than it is in Star Trek: The Original Series, despite the latter taking place ten years later.
So for those who've played both versions of Vvardenfell recently (because of this week's free giveaway or for any other reason), how do the differences between the two strike you?
Thanks for the info and the memories, everyone.
Yet another reason why I'm old: anyone born around the time TES III was first released is now 17 years old or soon will be.
'Combat is super clunky, missing/failing 10 attacks/casts in a row due to RNG is bad, no magicka regen is a joke (theres a mod for that)
Morgha_Kul wrote: »Great resolution, but the gameplay was meh.
Thanks for the info and the memories, everyone.
Yet another reason why I'm old: anyone born around the time TES III was first released is now 17 years old or soon will be.
Saucy_Jack wrote: »Wasn't a group in the process of remastering Morrowind using the Skyrim engine?
https://youtu.be/7_Bm0mtUFVE?t=57I am pretty sure that TES III has 3rd person camera. I remember playing it, using 3rd person... What version do you play ?only the first-person perspective is available in TES III (which makes me wonder why I needed to create my character's look during character generation if I'm never going to see him), especially after being used to playing my TESO character exclusively in third person.
Ilithyania wrote: »pretty sure TES games only have heavy and light attacks, unless you cast some spells
Morgha_Kul wrote: »I know, right? We've come so far in such a relatively short time. I remember when Pong was cutting edge.
Heck, I remember when I had to go OUTSIDE to play. Great resolution, but the gameplay was meh.