dwemer_paleologist wrote: »so, basicly my question here, that i apologize i did not ask earlier, but i wanted to lay a foundation with, (which i have now done so in the previous comments) was simply this.
who should be the one to determine the following:
who is a good player ?
who is a bad player ?
what is an actual exploit with a class or skill ?
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »who should be the one to determine the following:
who is a good player ?
who is a bad player ?
what is an actual exploit with a class or skill ?
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »you see, because constantly we see the comments made about how bad and trash some one player is, and that they should not be allowed to make comments on this forum and that thier opinion isnt worth listen to.
but, then the next patch comes, and we see the same person was able to kill them, and that somehow means that player should never have been allowed that, and the only way it was allowed was because zenimax some how is a failed work on the skill or class or perhaps the armor they allowed.
so for a short time we see this person is trash player and Bad.
by the forum users, but, after some changes were made by zenimax and a few patches change some things this player now is able to do better and this means it was not that the player is actually "Good" no no, this means that Zenimax has somehow failed and the patch itself and zenimax is to blame because in NO WAY should that "bad player" be able to kill you, i mean theres just no WAY!
right?
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »who should be the one to determine the following:
who is a good player ?
who is a bad player ?
what is an actual exploit with a class or skill ?
- who should be the one to determine the following
Me
- who is a good player?
Me. If i die, i was better but they were cheating. If they die, i was better.
- who is a bad player?
All of them
- what is an actual exploit with a class or skill?
Anything that kills me
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »you see, because constantly we see the comments made about how bad and trash some one player is, and that they should not be allowed to make comments on this forum and that thier opinion isnt worth listen to.
but, then the next patch comes, and we see the same person was able to kill them, and that somehow means that player should never have been allowed that, and the only way it was allowed was because zenimax some how is a failed work on the skill or class or perhaps the armor they allowed.
so for a short time we see this person is trash player and Bad.
by the forum users, but, after some changes were made by zenimax and a few patches change some things this player now is able to do better and this means it was not that the player is actually "Good" no no, this means that Zenimax has somehow failed and the patch itself and zenimax is to blame because in NO WAY should that "bad player" be able to kill you, i mean theres just no WAY!
right?
I’ll give you a quick example let’s say a nb is fighting a sorc and the sorc wins because they are a better player . In the next patch zos gives nbs a 1000% weapon damage increase. Now they duel again and the nb wins. Do you think this is fair? And that the nb won because he got better or because zos made a bad change to pvp
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »so, basicly my question here, that i apologize i did not ask earlier, but i wanted to lay a foundation with, (which i have now done so in the previous comments) was simply this.
who should be the one to determine the following:
who is a good player ?
who is a bad player ?
what is an actual exploit with a class or skill ?
Sorcs been driven to the verge of extinction by these nerfs and people are still complaining about them on the forums lmao.
Waffennacht wrote: »A sorc has such low healing.
No heal on healing ward
Even rapid won't compare to the Oblivion damage.
Not really sure what counters you even have access to
Purge won't touch infused Oblivion...
I dunno wtf you're supposed to do in this situation other than run or die