Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Obviously he means the choice of, for instance, Dunmer vs Argonian for a mDK.
Dunmer is 7% fire damage and 9% mana... which with 501 CPs is a huge difference.
Without the CPs, the difference is much, much smaller.
Tsar_Bogatyr wrote: »Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Obviously he means the choice of, for instance, Dunmer vs Argonian for a mDK.
Dunmer is 7% fire damage and 9% mana... which with 501 CPs is a huge difference.
Without the CPs, the difference is much, much smaller.
i dont know where you learned how to math but without the cp the diffirence is bigger than with the cp
Tsar_Bogatyr wrote: »Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Obviously he means the choice of, for instance, Dunmer vs Argonian for a mDK.
Dunmer is 7% fire damage and 9% mana... which with 501 CPs is a huge difference.
Without the CPs, the difference is much, much smaller.
i dont know where you learned how to math but without the cp the diffirence is bigger than with the cp
If CP scales your resource pools and you have a 9% racial passive increase, the CP player gets a bigger benefit. Same with the fire damage...
Tsar_Bogatyr wrote: »Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Obviously he means the choice of, for instance, Dunmer vs Argonian for a mDK.
Dunmer is 7% fire damage and 9% mana... which with 501 CPs is a huge difference.
Without the CPs, the difference is much, much smaller.
i dont know where you learned how to math but without the cp the diffirence is bigger than with the cp
If CP scales your resource pools and you have a 9% racial passive increase, the CP player gets a bigger benefit. Same with the fire damage...
Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
Ghost-Shot wrote: »dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »
It doesn't give you enough skill points for every passive and skill morph, or the alliance war passives that high ranks like yourselves have.
It's a nice video, but something from one of the CP campaigns would be a better demonstration of skill and ability against the multitude of different builds out there.
Why? The CP campaigns have serious balancing issues that don't exist on the no-cp.
I almost fell out of my chair laughing as your comment suggests non-CP does not suffer horrible balancing issues.
CP campaigns just have different balancing issues than non-CP.
Edit: Nice video fluff, it´s just i´m never going to like the non CP campaign. It´s just too slow and has the same problem that 1.5 had. My class (sorc) is a burst class that does not work well when dmg is too low to actually burst someone
I disagree, the issues are way less simply because of percentage stacking and insane numbers. A wrong race easily gets u 500 spelldmg+ that u lack. Everything is a possible 1shot and everybody can spam their oneshots as much as they want. Stupidity is literally being rewarded. 50% of the cp dont work properly, look at thaumaturge for instance. And the more cp u get, it will grow like cancer along with the lag. But the issue the no cp gets is a tryhard balancing regarding cp. But at least the 16k incap strikes wont happen on no cp...
But nobody forces u to go there anyway. I enjoy my pvp here because its much closer to 1.5
Thats were the personal taste kicks in.
Wait what race gives you spell damage?
not directly, i meant a comparison between like Nord vs Highelf(max mag = dmg+ressource). The profit is so big, if u picked the wrong race u really suffer bigtime. On the no-cp the impact is way smaller.
As a redguard my profit from having 40k stamina is insane.
On the No-CP i cant totally rely on my ressourcepool, i have to find ways independent of what race i am. I for instance use engine guardian and repentence.
On the CP campaign i have 300 regen less but have a way better regen overall because of adrenaline rush and i dont even use repentence or engine guardian.