hunters are the tamers ( and the "scaners" , if u know FF)That sums up my opinion. Hunter might be doable if you explain what you mean by hunter. A class line with extra damage vs monsters? Sure
How about Clerics? I miss the full heal Clerics gave in EQ1 , although not sure how well it would work out in this game , but I know some people just want to be healers and not fighters.
Or: "what we really want zenimax to bring to eso".
under construction
1.I know dragons r known to be missing thousands of years. but nothing can stop the master-writer, so - DRAGONS! and all of their adds: Riding,Summoning,morphing to, etc.
2.Same thing about the Dwemer. Why cant i be the mechanical expert dwemer? and the introduction of guns-alikes can be made with them too.
3.Shape changing tempers.
4.Skin-changing, morphing character.
5.Hunter and monster tamer.
6.A story that explains why there r more then 1 "The one Vestige, Arrow, queen's eye" etc.
(the meme isnt mine)
nerevarine1138 wrote: »I can't actually quantify the amount of "No" this thread inspires. Just... just no. Every one of these ideas completely destroys the feel of the Elder Scrolls series.
How about Clerics? I miss the full heal Clerics gave in EQ1 , although not sure how well it would work out in this game , but I know some people just want to be healers and not fighters.
Elder_Thorn wrote: »How about Clerics? I miss the full heal Clerics gave in EQ1 , although not sure how well it would work out in this game , but I know some people just want to be healers and not fighters.
Make a templar, equip healing staff, wear armor you think is appropriate for a cleric. DoneOr: "what we really want zenimax to bring to eso".
under construction
1.I know dragons r known to be missing thousands of years. but nothing can stop the master-writer, so - DRAGONS! and all of their adds: Riding,Summoning,morphing to, etc.
2.Same thing about the Dwemer. Why cant i be the mechanical expert dwemer? and the introduction of guns-alikes can be made with them too.
3.Shape changing tempers.
4.Skin-changing, morphing character.
5.Hunter and monster tamer.
6.A story that explains why there r more then 1 "The one Vestige, Arrow, queen's eye" etc.
(the meme isnt mine)
Dragons... hmkay, not for riding or allied with players in any form though
Dwemer should stay unplayable and mysterious.
Shape changing tempers - wat?
Skin changing - wat?
Hunter and Monster Tamer - yeah, why not
More Focus on Singleplayer content: Hell no, more sandbox free for all, everyone beats up everyone content plx
It kind of feels like you are trying to mold ESO into looking like the other games out there. Once games are like the others, they tend to become less interesting IMO.
The Dwemer aren't accessible for a reason, their knowledge gone (and honestly we don't need another game with tech and magic that is intermingled)
Same with Dragons, not around for a reason, you can't really tie them with a class because eventually you will have 100k maxed DKs running around doing dragon things.
You will hit lots of resistance from a decent portion of the community if you suggest anything against ES cannon, a good portion of the game is based on that player base.
No, they aren't missing, they are dead.1.I know dragons r known to be missing thousands of years. but nothing can stop the master-writer, so - DRAGONS! and all of their adds: Riding,Summoning,morphing to, etc.
also: can be the ultimate expansion of the dragonknight type.
These are missing, they are a known mystery, and completely absent, probably dead.2.Same thing about the Dwemer. Why cant i be the mechanical expert dwemer? and the introduction of guns-alikes can be made with them too.
No reason against it, but no reason for it really.3.Shape changing tempers.
as Shape changing stones or runes that make the equipment fit your style.
No thanks, not interested, but I won't stop anyone who wants it.4.Skin-changing, morphing character.
(Skin changers are in the game. play the pact a bit. but they should be skill-available, it can rich our experience.)
That's Pokemon, not Elder Scrolls.5.Hunter and monster tamer.
(hunters are the tamers ( and the "scaners" , if u know FF)
they have the advantage of learning the monsters, and extra damage is an understatement)
There isn't more than one vestige, each of us is doing a seperate story, we just play in the same open world. This is a basic of MMOs.6.A story that explains why there r more then 1 "The one Vestige, Arrow, queen's eye" etc. therefore letting the game be more open to "the arms of the many" quests.
Alpha_Protocol wrote: »@OP, clearly you are still hung-up on WoW. No.
AlexDougherty wrote: »No, they aren't missing, they are dead.1.I know dragons r known to be missing thousands of years. but nothing can stop the master-writer, so - DRAGONS! and all of their adds: Riding,Summoning,morphing to, etc.
also: can be the ultimate expansion of the dragonknight type.These are missing, they are a known mystery, and completely absent, probably dead.2.Same thing about the Dwemer. Why cant i be the mechanical expert dwemer? and the introduction of guns-alikes can be made with them too.No reason against it, but no reason for it really.3.Shape changing tempers.
as Shape changing stones or runes that make the equipment fit your style.No thanks, not interested, but I won't stop anyone who wants it.4.Skin-changing, morphing character.
(Skin changers are in the game. play the pact a bit. but they should be skill-available, it can rich our experience.)That's Pokemon, not Elder Scrolls.5.Hunter and monster tamer.
(hunters are the tamers ( and the "scaners" , if u know FF)
they have the advantage of learning the monsters, and extra damage is an understatement)
There isn't more than one vestige, each of us is doing a seperate story, we just play in the same open world. This is a basic of MMOs.6.A story that explains why there r more then 1 "The one Vestige, Arrow, queen's eye" etc. therefore letting the game be more open to "the arms of the many" quests.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Well why don't we just add helicopters, lasers and robot-secret-agents to the game? If we're going to ignore lore and aesthetics entirely, we might as well just make this game the Ghost Rider of MMOs.
And the true winner is, No.nerevarine1138 wrote: »I can't actually quantify the amount of "No" this thread inspires. Just... just no. Every one of these ideas completely destroys the feel of the Elder Scrolls series.
And the true winner is, No.nerevarine1138 wrote: »I can't actually quantify the amount of "No" this thread inspires. Just... just no. Every one of these ideas completely destroys the feel of the Elder Scrolls series.
@nerevarine1138 Well stated.
Some concepts just make me shudder, and not with joy or appreciation.
It kind of feels like you are trying to mold ESO into looking like the other games out there. Once games are like the others, they tend to become less interesting IMO.
The Dwemer aren't accessible for a reason, their knowledge gone (and honestly we don't need another game with tech and magic that is intermingled)
Same with Dragons, not around for a reason, you can't really tie them with a class because eventually you will have 100k maxed DKs running around doing dragon things.
You will hit lots of resistance from a decent portion of the community if you suggest anything against ES cannon, a good portion of the game is based on that player base.
Man, I want Eso to improve on any of its existing elements.
With the right hand, Eso can recreate everything in "ES" originality. being afraid it will look like another world is just saying:stop innovating bethesda.
Again , the dwemer can be partialy revealed, like all the elves that r looking and using dwemer tech without being a dwemer. u can be a "dwemer lost child" and have enough knowledge to outstand, but not enough to unravel the dwemer's mistery.
about the 100k DK, if it will b done modestly, its enough for us to *** bricks.
ES cannon is everchanging, as the nature of the scrolls themself, thats the beauty of the elder scrolls man
Actually @dviralush I have been in many topics concerning changes that could be implemented in the game. Or at least discussed.
Your turtle is cute, but your suggestion most definitely is not.Others have posted similar replies of NO! to your concepts. There have been comments in reference to... well let's just say that This Is ESO. Other games with these features already in them are that way --->
I do not care for any of the suggestions you put forth. There are already other threads that do cover some similar, but not the same, concepts in much better detail while remaining Elder Scrolls.
I do not wear blinders to concepts, but I will state my opinion upon what I believe is better, while others ... have only tunnel vision received from other ... places.
Truckdriver wrote: ».