Maintenance for the week of May 27:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – May 27

BUY New SERVER for EU

Ignis_Irae
Ignis_Irae
✭✭✭
it piece of junk now. performance in Eu now is so bad and in NA is q. ok. so pls not giv us a [snip] about our end problems . :((((

[edited for profanity]
Edited by ZOS_FalcoYamaoka on April 6, 2020 3:51PM
  • RefLiberty
    RefLiberty
    ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yeah, I wonder what will happen with new players when Greymoore launches

    T13TPTu.gif



    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    hhehehe :))) agreee. in 100% :)
    Options
  • Universe
    Universe
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    It is more likely that we will get a brand new crown store system... :D
    Some videos I recorded for fun: Main character:
    PC EU main: Universe - AD magicka Sorcerer, Former Emperor, Grand Overlord, The Merciless, Trial Bosses Solo Champion
    Top alts: Genius(stamina/sagicka Dragonknight) The Force(stamina Nightblade) and other chars.
    PC NA main: The Magic - AD magicka Sorcerer
    Started playing ESO in beta & early access
    User_ID: Daedric_Prince
    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    in few week befor one forum user said.... (i totaly agree)

    Benefits: (for play NA server)

    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No random disconnects for half the server at one location
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No 15+ seconds desyncs
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - Skills will be working again
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No slideshows when a group bigger than 10 persons shows up
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - Everything else that is bad about PC EU cyro performance is gone
    Options
  • Universe
    Universe
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    in few week befor one forum user said.... (i totaly agree)

    Benefits: (for play NA server)

    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No random disconnects for half the server at one location
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No 15+ seconds desyncs
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - Skills will be working again
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - No slideshows when a group bigger than 10 persons shows up
    - You will be able to play PvP again
    - Everything else that is bad about PC EU cyro performance is gone

    Yes.
    @caperb posted this.

    I can confirm that the performance of PC NA server is much better.
    I'm leveling a new character on PC NA since a few days ago... It is really fun! :)
    Starting all over again isn't easy but it has its rewards...
    In this case it is better overall performance despite additional 1 second to my latency.
    Edited by Universe on April 5, 2020 11:30PM
    Some videos I recorded for fun: Main character:
    PC EU main: Universe - AD magicka Sorcerer, Former Emperor, Grand Overlord, The Merciless, Trial Bosses Solo Champion
    Top alts: Genius(stamina/sagicka Dragonknight) The Force(stamina Nightblade) and other chars.
    PC NA main: The Magic - AD magicka Sorcerer
    Started playing ESO in beta & early access
    User_ID: Daedric_Prince
    Options
  • bluebird
    bluebird
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    ZOS should replace their old and crippled EU server hamsters with new viking hamsters for Greymoor to make sure they'll be able to handle all those upcoming Skyrim nostalgia train logins. :tongue:
    Not+all+vikings+used+axes+_ec2a77ca49dc3ef81f983c1a2dffb679.jpg
    Options
  • JamieAubrey
    JamieAubrey
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    We should invade the NA server at their prime time and show them how laggy it is
    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    here is test to real conection time for ESO SERVERS. pls check few times during few days u will see we have serious problem in EU server conetion time and answers. and in NA is ususaly 300-400 iv got even 200ms average. on EU we usualy have CONNNEEEECCCTTTTIIINNNNGG (means 999+ ) maybe we have to reanme subscribtion from Eso plus to ESO 999+ :))))

    https://pingtestlive.com/eso-status
    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    hehehe now ive got even 42331ms. great job EU eso team. realy great.
    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    198.20.198.110 his is eso Server adress for EU. as u see it is on Baltimore. means what. if server is in Germany what Zos claims why adress is in baltimore? it is retoric question. i know the answer but think in same time most common servers go csgo , wow, eve etc have 30-150ms depends of region. only ESO EU server have fro 500ms to 42seconds :))))))))))))))0 and in the same time my ping counter in eso GAME screen inform me 110 ms :)))))))))))) nice bull s hit :) ZENI pls answer that!!!! i read other topics with similar problem ZOS never answered! Never! :)))))))))
    Options
  • RefLiberty
    RefLiberty
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    in few week befor one forum user said.... (i totaly agree)

    Benefits: (for play NA server)

    That would be the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals, maybe ever.

    First, if we would all get merged there, it would be laggy just the same.

    Second, I'm not going to pay the sub to play with transatlantic ping, regardless how "good" it is.

    Third, Bethesda is not poor Indie company with $14.50 monthly budget for server with "I rent Servers" hosting company in someones basement. It is a AAA very monetized title, they could finally put the money where all the talk is and step up a bit.
    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    that why i put this link to ESo EU/NA servers Ping. u all now can test both by yourselves. i have chars on both NA and Eu and it is not realy true the ping is huge. it is about 200 to 400ms to Na from EUrope but game is sooth even on cyro. what for ping on eso claims i have 110ms in Eu server if i have real 2-3 seconds latency from click to real answer from server when i do cast a spell in Cyro? means procesor and memory is .... ( there is no nice word for it). of agree if we all go to NA it will crash too. and maybe bethy have to do something at last to their servers.
    i have funny ask. maybe zos open 4th faction in Eu cyro and they will see dc/ep/ad all will fight with zos faction near their base :))))))))))))))) i and 60%of my frinds cancel our subs as a protest for such a Behaviour of Game operator. u do what u think . but ESO is great game we can save it if we force our ZOs and bethy companies to do something useful.
    Options
  • RefLiberty
    RefLiberty
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    198.20.198.110 his is eso Server adress for EU. as u see it is on Baltimore. means what. if server is in Germany what Zos claims why adress is in baltimore? it is retoric question. i know the answer but think in same time most common servers go csgo , wow, eve etc have 30-150ms depends of region. only ESO EU server have fro 500ms to 42seconds :))))))))))))))0 and in the same time my ping counter in eso GAME screen inform me 110 ms :)))))))))))) nice bull s hit :) ZENI pls answer that!!!! i read other topics with similar problem ZOS never answered! Never! :)))))))))

    Yeah that also.

    I'm not able to see 198.20.*.* IPv4 range allocated for Germany geographically, but I can see it allocated for US.

    This is Germany (in that close allocation range):
    198.16.109.0 >> 198.16.109.255
    198.22.51.0 >> 198.22.51.255
    So there is no range between 198.20 until 198.22 which passed 198.20 range

    US geographically reserved range is there, so 198.20.*.* fits:
    198.20.192.0 >> 198.21.20.255

    So yeah, IDK... maybe we are on US server already from start lol.
    :D

    Options
  • Ignis_Irae
    Ignis_Irae
    ✭✭✭
    :))))))))))))) heheh but as u use my link from above u saw us server have beere ping then EU (im in Europe) means even if both of them are in US eheheh our is using PC components ... not any RACK :)))) maybe EU means Experienced Users... cuse whe have to be realy magician in Cyro to play with such a latency :)))) and other problems. u know NA means Not Advanced maybe? :)))))) im to frustrated now . i have only crazy things on mind cause whatever strategy or tactic u have to Cyro in Eu it is usless due to lag :). this time only ball can do something but even they sometimes are stuck in the middle of coldfire and oil and after 4 sec of such a stuch all 30 ppl ball are dead in milisec :)))))
    Options
  • oxygen_thief
    oxygen_thief
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    198.20.198.110 his is eso Server adress for EU. as u see it is on Baltimore. means what. if server is in Germany what Zos claims why adress is in baltimore? it is retoric question. i know the answer but think in same time most common servers go csgo , wow, eve etc have 30-150ms depends of region. only ESO EU server have fro 500ms to 42seconds :))))))))))))))0 and in the same time my ping counter in eso GAME screen inform me 110 ms :)))))))))))) nice bull s hit :) ZENI pls answer that!!!! i read other topics with similar problem ZOS never answered! Never! :)))))))))
    it's a us server IP. I have 80-110 in-game latency at night on EU when people fall asleep. it's impossible for me to have such ping on us server
    Options
  • SmukkeHeks
    SmukkeHeks
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Could someone smarter than me explain if I’m getting this correctly; are we routed from Europe, to the states, back to the German server?

    If so, it would make sense why everything seems slow? I’m living an hour and a half from the German border, some 650 km from Frankfurt, but if my commands needs to travel half way around the world, times two, it all makes sense?

    Wonder if our Australian comrades are taking the other way around, cross Asia and then back to Europe through UK.

    Does it even work that way?

    And - couldn’t they just make servers bigger?
    Options
  • Malmai
    Malmai
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Because its 1 Megaserver all others are just handling data from NA thats why needs to travel around the world. Keep costs low and dont care since u can milk people dry, when it doesnt work anymore, make new game and milk more or just re-release game 5 times. Rinse repeat. Others are probably leased btw...
    Edited by Malmai on April 6, 2020 5:43AM
    Options
  • oxygen_thief
    oxygen_thief
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    SmukkeHeks wrote: »
    Could someone smarter than me explain if I’m getting this correctly; are we routed from Europe, to the states, back to the German server?
    no we dont
    Options
  • LarsS
    LarsS
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Guys there is only one login server, which is in US. Thats why you get an US address.
    GM for The Daggerfall Authority EU PC
    Options
  • LarsS
    LarsS
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Remember just a fet days ago by last patch zos messed something up so they had to take the EU server down, the NA still worked. They Have said that the EU server have more players, thats probably the reson for difference. If they really care they should uppgrade the EU server.
    GM for The Daggerfall Authority EU PC
    Options
  • Hillier11
    Hillier11
    ✭✭✭
    Pvp is terrible right now. Always crashing
    Options
  • sergiok
    sergiok
    just buy more crates and RP
    Options
  • daemonios
    daemonios
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    There is way too much disinformation in this thread.
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    198.20.198.110 his is eso Server adress for EU. as u see it is on Baltimore. means what. if server is in Germany what Zos claims why adress is in baltimore? it is retoric question. i know the answer but think in same time most common servers go csgo , wow, eve etc have 30-150ms depends of region. only ESO EU server have fro 500ms to 42seconds :))))))))))))))0 and in the same time my ping counter in eso GAME screen inform me 110 ms :)))))))))))) nice bull s hit :) ZENI pls answer that!!!! i read other topics with similar problem ZOS never answered! Never! :)))))))))

    This is wrong. That is the IP for the NA server, not EU. Per the ESO help page:
    HOW DO I DO A PATHPING AND TRACERT TO THE SERVERS TO TEST MY CONNECTION?
    Updated 11/26/2018 03:30 PM
    The ip address is 195.122.154.1 for EU and 198.20.198.110 for US.
    
    Malmai wrote: »
    Because its 1 Megaserver all others are just handling data from NA thats why needs to travel around the world. Keep costs low and dont care since u can milk people dry, when it doesnt work anymore, make new game and milk more or just re-release game 5 times. Rinse repeat. Others are probably leased btw...

    That is not how the megaservers work. Each platform has a megaserver. That means PC-NA, PC-EU, PS4-NA, PS4-EU, XBOX-NA, XBOX-EU are megaservers. What the megaserver technology does is tat it dynamically instances zones and other areas depending on population. In other games, to prevent overcrowding, players would have to choose a server and stick to that server, so there might be a dozen servers for NA and another dozen for EU. ESO has one server per platform, and can create additional copies of a zone to allow for more players without overcrowding. This is why when you group with someone in the same zone as you, you sometimes get a message that they are in a different instance and you are offered the chance to travel to them. If you don't, you can be grouped with someone and they are invisible to you (and you to them) while apparently standing in the same spot.

    This isn't to say that the megaserver isn't responsible for some of the issues we experience. But it is NOT because every player on every platform is somehow connecting to a single server.
    Edited by daemonios on April 6, 2020 9:25AM
    Options
  • Dracane
    Dracane
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am living in Frankfurt, germany. Where the server is supposed to be located and it is bad for me as well. At least in pvp.
    So maybe the theory is true.
    Auri-El is my lord,
    Trinimac is my shield,
    Magnus is my mind.

    My debut album on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Gleandra/videos
    Options
  • Curious_Death
    Curious_Death
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.18363.535]

    32 bytes

    C:\Users\****>ping 195.122.154.1 /t

    Pinging 195.122.154.1 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=54

    2048 bytes

    C:\Users\****>ping -l 2048 195.122.154.1 /t

    Pinging 195.122.154.1 with 2048 bytes of data:
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=69ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=122ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=74ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=71ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=74ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=72ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=75ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=69ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=69ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=74ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=73ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=70ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=87ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=86ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=76ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=94ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=68ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=67ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=2048 time=82ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 195.122.154.1:
    Packets: Sent = 37, Received = 34, Lost = 3 (8% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 122ms, Average = 73ms
    My favourite 65500 bytes!
    C:\Users\*****>ping -l 65500 195.122.154.1 /t

    Pinging 195.122.154.1 with 65500 bytes of data:
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=102ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=101ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=105ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=109ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=102ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=103ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=101ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=106ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=101ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=100ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=101ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=98ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=105ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=110ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=105ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=106ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=99ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=102ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=141ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=111ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=107ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=104ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=107ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=100ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=109ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=109ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=112ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=98ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=116ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=103ms TTL=54
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=109ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=102ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=108ms TTL=54
    Reply from 195.122.154.1: bytes=65500 time=102ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 195.122.154.1:
    Packets: Sent = 51, Received = 34, Lost = 17 (33% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 141ms, Average = 105ms
    Edited by Curious_Death on April 6, 2020 11:53AM
    Options
  • Curious_Death
    Curious_Death
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    timed out = that's how server decides about block.. and how magically tanks die without block when they hold block.. 32 BYTES!!! wtf
    Options
  • JanTanhide
    JanTanhide
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    it piece of junk now. performance in Eu now is so bad and in NA is q. ok. so pls not giv us a s hit about our end problems . :((((

    Not just EU. NA performance is abysmal as well.
    Options
  • Mancombe_Nosehair
    Mancombe_Nosehair
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    JanTanhide wrote: »
    Ignis_Irae wrote: »
    it piece of junk now. performance in Eu now is so bad and in NA is q. ok. so pls not giv us a s hit about our end problems . :((((

    Not just EU. NA performance is abysmal as well.

    As someone who has been playing on na for a year, and prior to that, eu, your definition of abysmal is rather different to mine.
    Options
  • dotme
    dotme
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    New hardware can't fix bad code
    PS4NA
    Options
Sign In or Register to comment.