A_Silverius wrote: »Although Eve has a record of 6,142 players in a single pvp event, a better comparison would be Planetside 2 - a free to play and non p2w game released 2 years before ESO and broke the GUINESS WORLD RECORD: 1158 Players on 1 Map.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaPXZlM3H3A
luen79rwb17_ESO wrote: »A_Silverius wrote: »Although Eve has a record of 6,142 players in a single pvp event, a better comparison would be Planetside 2 - a free to play and non p2w game released 2 years before ESO and broke the GUINESS WORLD RECORD: 1158 Players on 1 Map.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaPXZlM3H3A
Dang! So many people on 1 Map! That game certainly needs more maps LOL
Yes, there are issues with this game, but if OP is paying to play this game and considers it inferior then shame on them for continuing to support a game they consider so inferior.
Also, Eve Online is a good game but it is a much simpler game as far as server and client load goes. Then to suggest Amazon will kick this game's butt with a product they have yet to come out with is humorous. Not sure if you are talking Amazon's PvPvE New World game that is a very different type of game that most here will not enjoy (I have spent extensive time in both Alpha and Beta). Maybe you are talking about their go at a Lord of the Rings MMORPG that we know so little about and will be years away from release if it ever actually gets released. Most MMORPGs in development are never released.
Nemesis7884 wrote: »Yes, there are issues with this game, but if OP is paying to play this game and considers it inferior then shame on them for continuing to support a game they consider so inferior.
Also, Eve Online is a good game but it is a much simpler game as far as server and client load goes. Then to suggest Amazon will kick this game's butt with a product they have yet to come out with is humorous. Not sure if you are talking Amazon's PvPvE New World game that is a very different type of game that most here will not enjoy (I have spent extensive time in both Alpha and Beta). Maybe you are talking about their go at a Lord of the Rings MMORPG that we know so little about and will be years away from release if it ever actually gets released. Most MMORPGs in development are never released.
your points are fair - but at the same time - there are just as complex / power intense and more online games with many more players that have a lot fewer issues the level of performance for an online game in this day and age is not acceptable - it wasnt 6 years ago
VoidCommander wrote: »Am I the only one who isn’t super bothered by slight performance inconveniences? Like sure the group finder doesn’t work occasionally, but outside of that the game works just fine. Where are these game breaking performance issues people keep talking about.
I do agree that ZOS could afford some more creative thinking. Breaking away from the dungeon, expansion, dungeon zone cycle would be for the best in my opinion. Hell, things like reworking dialog choices for older content to reflect what quests you have already done would be a nice update for the PvE community.
DivineFirstYOLO wrote: »Yeah you are right that you do not lose much performance when you are doing brain dead easy content like questing, RPing, farming nodes, trading, housing, etc. ...but it does matter for PvPers and ppl in vTrials/vDungeons and the performance has actually decreased. Casuals don't see such problems cause they are as the name says too casual to understand. Keep questing and live your happy potato life.
JamuThatsWho wrote: »No-one is forcing you to pay. If you're unhappy, stop spending.
BackStabeth wrote: »How is it that EVE Online can provide a massive game that involves battles with thousands of players all at the same time, and ZoS cannot even provide any space at all where 100 people can play without major game breaking issues?
I suspect the funds that should go into infrastructure are going to CEOs instead. ZoS squeezes every penny they are able from each player, unreasonable prices on everything, no conversion for gold to crowns or vice/versa. And they do not return any of that funding into a game that functions even halfway decent.
Amazon is going to kick ZoS butt when their new MMORPG comes out, and considering the big name MMORPGs on the horizon, unless ZoS does something drastically different and use the funds they are squeezing out of players they are going to lose funding for this game. I am not going to stick around while ZoS tries to play catch up with gaming corps that do a lot more, a lot better.
Shame on you ZoS, shame on you for not listening to the player base, shame on you for ignoring your customers the ones that put money in your pocket. Shame on you for hyping game improvements that really amount to a politicians promise never realized. Shame on you for not dumping money into infrastructure that clearly is not up to par.
How can EVE Online, which makes far less revenue than ESO do it so much better with thousands of people playing in major battles, with graphics far more intense and demanding serving from a little Island in the North Atlantic, and ZoS cannot even handle a few hundred at the same time with short drawing graphics and inferior graphics to boot?
How is it everyone is doing all these things far better, way better than ZoS? What the hell is that broken that it cannot be easily fixed by investing some of the money the game generates in infrastructure of the game?
This sucks!
A_Silverius wrote: »
According to https://planetside.fandom.com/wiki/The_World there's 4 maps. They look like Cyrodiil sized maps maybe even bigger.
VoidCommander wrote: »DivineFirstYOLO wrote: »Yeah you are right that you do not lose much performance when you are doing brain dead easy content like questing, RPing, farming nodes, trading, housing, etc. ...but it does matter for PvPers and ppl in vTrials/vDungeons and the performance has actually decreased. Casuals don't see such problems cause they are as the name says too casual to understand. Keep questing and live your happy potato life.
I do my fair share of veteran content just like many players who have been playing since beta. I’m sorry that you would rather delude yourself into believing you can’t play harder content because you have “unplayability” issues. If you are struggling to get your second undaunted key @DivineFirstYolo, the issue is likely that you have something new to learn, and you need to stop blaming lag for dificulties with harder content.