One thing I have seen far to often in recent years, people do not ensure the keep is clear once they take it. Considering you are saying the person that rezed was a skilled player the person with them just might have been similarly skilled and was able to rez then go invis (potion) to avoid being detected by you.
Just a thought as I have rezed a player in an enemy keep after we lost it. I was not detected. I was just careful.
One thing I have seen far to often in recent years, people do not ensure the keep is clear once they take it. Considering you are saying the person that rezed was a skilled player the person with them just might have been similarly skilled and was able to rez then go invis (potion) to avoid being detected by you.
Just a thought as I have rezed a player in an enemy keep after we lost it. I was not detected. I was just careful.
I know this is possible but yet you see the animation.
Here no animation, at all, no ground animation at all, nothing. 3of us standing at 1millimeter of her corpse and i was checking around stealth turning on my right, my left and behind me.
We were at least 3 to observe this, a NB dead at our feet, rezzing plain and simple in middle of us in a fort that we just defended.
I whispered that player that she just cheated in front of us and will be reported, and the answer was
You must be new ... learn to play and check the necromancer skills ultimate......
all you pugs love zergging but does not know how to play. Then i was accused of surf zergging as i was not in a group : so defending a fort inside is also zergging now ?
Necro may have sneaked away already.
You get what 1 minute to accept the res.
Please do not automatically assume someone is cheating if they do something you thought impossible.
I get so many whispers like that from players i kill, they just cant accept that 1 player can kill them 1v5, i must be cheating.
Belive it or not cheating in this game isnt as prevalent as some might have you belive.
Necro may have sneaked away already.
You get what 1 minute to accept the res.
Please do not automatically assume someone is cheating if they do something you thought impossible.
I get so many whispers like that from players i kill, they just cant accept that 1 player can kill them 1v5, i must be cheating.
Belive it or not cheating in this game isnt as prevalent as some might have you belive.
oh i dont doubt of the abilities, she killed me several times and i learn from that. I never ever yelled or raged after someone who killed me. If i go on a pvp world, then i have to accept my deaths (numerous). But again, i have to repeat
We were 3 to fight her, She died at our feet. Not far away. There was no NECRO in the area. I am affirmative. And i am not alone to say it.
When you try to rezz someone, there is the blue animation going on. Then the player receive the offer and can accept it or wait a little (usually i wait the last secondes).
But this time there was not possibility she receives an offer before dieing :P So how did she rezz with no offer ?
Kalik_Gold wrote: »She may have been previously resurrected but not yet, pressed the pop up button.
like the 1st few seconds of this video (although this was in open world, not in a fort/keep):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEoN9tljV7A&frags=pl%2Cwn
Kalik_Gold wrote: »She may have been previously resurrected but not yet, pressed the pop up button.
like the 1st few seconds of this video (although this was in open world, not in a fort/keep):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEoN9tljV7A&frags=pl%2Cwn
This... Done this a few times. Not bound to res when there someone camping my corpse
Necro may have sneaked away already.
You get what 1 minute to accept the res.
Please do not automatically assume someone is cheating if they do something you thought impossible.
I get so many whispers like that from players i kill, they just cant accept that 1 player can kill them 1v5, i must be cheating.
Belive it or not cheating in this game isnt as prevalent as some might have you belive.
oh i dont doubt of the abilities, she killed me several times and i learn from that. I never ever yelled or raged after someone who killed me. If i go on a pvp world, then i have to accept my deaths (numerous). But again, i have to repeat
We were 3 to fight her, She died at our feet. Not far away. There was no NECRO in the area. I am affirmative. And i am not alone to say it.
When you try to rezz someone, there is the blue animation going on. Then the player receive the offer and can accept it or wait a little (usually i wait the last secondes).
But this time there was not possibility she receives an offer before dieing :P So how did she rezz with no offer ?
You can use for example a heavy attack to mask most of the res animation.
If the person doing the res was also sneaking you may not have seen much of the res animation, if at all.
well how do you know there was no necro standing there somewhere? might have been somewhere on the wall, used the ult, back to sneak, then 30 seconds later that NB stands up. that skill has a good range.
So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
VaranisArano wrote: »Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
It would be interesting to get a response from ZOS on this, because in a similar fashion, its an exploit to bypass the need to siege walls/door in order to enter a keep.
So does that also apply to actions taken within a keep that prior to the necro ult required being inside the keep?
In this case, prior to the new ability, it was impossible to rez a player inside a sealed keep unless the rezzing player was also in the keep (barring things like a delayed rez, obviously). Now, its been proven possible that with the necro ult, it doesn't take keep status into account, allowing players to bypass the need to siege their way into a sealed keep in order to rez dead players inside that keep.
So is that intended behavior? I suspect so, because I can't see how ZOS would code the ability to distinguish keep status, but I do think its going to have an interesting impact on Cyrodiil. Everyone make darn sure those bodies are cleared out or watched.
VaranisArano wrote: »Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
It would be interesting to get a response from ZOS on this, because in a similar fashion, its an exploit to bypass the need to siege walls/door in order to enter a keep.
So does that also apply to actions taken within a keep that prior to the necro ult required being inside the keep?
In this case, prior to the new ability, it was impossible to rez a player inside a sealed keep unless the rezzing player was also in the keep (barring things like a delayed rez, obviously). Now, its been proven possible that with the necro ult, it doesn't take keep status into account, allowing players to bypass the need to siege their way into a sealed keep in order to rez dead players inside that keep.
So is that intended behavior? I suspect so, because I can't see how ZOS would code the ability to distinguish keep status, but I do think its going to have an interesting impact on Cyrodiil. Everyone make darn sure those bodies are cleared out or watched.
Teleport strike/ambush can get you in a keep through gated doors if you're attacking someone going through. Precise timing is all you need. Seen it happen and I feel it's the same concept... The skill is agnostic in relation to the keep. The skill is just the skill.
VaranisArano wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
It would be interesting to get a response from ZOS on this, because in a similar fashion, its an exploit to bypass the need to siege walls/door in order to enter a keep.
So does that also apply to actions taken within a keep that prior to the necro ult required being inside the keep?
In this case, prior to the new ability, it was impossible to rez a player inside a sealed keep unless the rezzing player was also in the keep (barring things like a delayed rez, obviously). Now, its been proven possible that with the necro ult, it doesn't take keep status into account, allowing players to bypass the need to siege their way into a sealed keep in order to rez dead players inside that keep.
So is that intended behavior? I suspect so, because I can't see how ZOS would code the ability to distinguish keep status, but I do think its going to have an interesting impact on Cyrodiil. Everyone make darn sure those bodies are cleared out or watched.
Teleport strike/ambush can get you in a keep through gated doors if you're attacking someone going through. Precise timing is all you need. Seen it happen and I feel it's the same concept... The skill is agnostic in relation to the keep. The skill is just the skill.
That, along with using DK chains to get up on the walls, is exactly the exploit I was speaking of. ZOS has said that's bypassing the need to siege and is an exploit.
VaranisArano wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
It would be interesting to get a response from ZOS on this, because in a similar fashion, its an exploit to bypass the need to siege walls/door in order to enter a keep.
So does that also apply to actions taken within a keep that prior to the necro ult required being inside the keep?
In this case, prior to the new ability, it was impossible to rez a player inside a sealed keep unless the rezzing player was also in the keep (barring things like a delayed rez, obviously). Now, its been proven possible that with the necro ult, it doesn't take keep status into account, allowing players to bypass the need to siege their way into a sealed keep in order to rez dead players inside that keep.
So is that intended behavior? I suspect so, because I can't see how ZOS would code the ability to distinguish keep status, but I do think its going to have an interesting impact on Cyrodiil. Everyone make darn sure those bodies are cleared out or watched.
Teleport strike/ambush can get you in a keep through gated doors if you're attacking someone going through. Precise timing is all you need. Seen it happen and I feel it's the same concept... The skill is agnostic in relation to the keep. The skill is just the skill.
That, along with using DK chains to get up on the walls, is exactly the exploit I was speaking of. ZOS has said that's bypassing the need to siege and is an exploit.
Looks like it's being fixed with u23.
VaranisArano wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Cheezits94 wrote: »So i made a test with my necro, and husband
He let him died inside a fort, approximatively where the NB died.
I went outside, near his position and rezzed him without problem. ME outside. Him inside.
Then he made sur to die, we dont want to benefit of a strange rezz
So its strange for me. I should not be able to rezz someone behind a wall.
See.. Maybe you should have tested that before accusing a player of cheating. Seems your claim is false.
First i whispered the player, and yes said she cheated BUT i still did not report her. So i think its legitimate to seak a correct answer, and if were alone to say that i would probably doubt of myself, but when 3 players says absolutely the same thing after seeing together the same event, then again, i am seeking an answer.
Then, i am waiting for an answer from ZOS_GinaBruno : I still not understand why suddenly in PVP a class could rezz a player through a wall.
It would be interesting to get a response from ZOS on this, because in a similar fashion, its an exploit to bypass the need to siege walls/door in order to enter a keep.
So does that also apply to actions taken within a keep that prior to the necro ult required being inside the keep?
In this case, prior to the new ability, it was impossible to rez a player inside a sealed keep unless the rezzing player was also in the keep (barring things like a delayed rez, obviously). Now, its been proven possible that with the necro ult, it doesn't take keep status into account, allowing players to bypass the need to siege their way into a sealed keep in order to rez dead players inside that keep.
So is that intended behavior? I suspect so, because I can't see how ZOS would code the ability to distinguish keep status, but I do think its going to have an interesting impact on Cyrodiil. Everyone make darn sure those bodies are cleared out or watched.
Teleport strike/ambush can get you in a keep through gated doors if you're attacking someone going through. Precise timing is all you need. Seen it happen and I feel it's the same concept... The skill is agnostic in relation to the keep. The skill is just the skill.
That, along with using DK chains to get up on the walls, is exactly the exploit I was speaking of. ZOS has said that's bypassing the need to siege and is an exploit.
Looks like it's being fixed with u23.
Ah, this? "Fixed numerous instances where well-timed ability uses from charges, leaps, teleports, blinks, and pulls could allow you to bypass collision"
If that's the case, I'm looking forward to it.