The removal of major expedition from cripple is awful

Nerftheforums

Can this please be reverted? It was nothing op and allowed non healers in pvp to have access to major expedition. It had a completely different mechanic than both double take and path. The redundancy was only in the buff it provided, but mechanically speaking and from a class identity point of view they were very very different.

Moreover, I doubt anybody would consider it an op or problematic feature.

Dojohoda

I do not like this push to reduce redundancy; there are not enough slots for such a thing. Some redundancy is GOOD. It allows us to have choices. So, yes, I am agreeing.

Nerftheforums

Redundancy of certain buffs is also what makes different playstyles available. Now they just nerfed magnb for literally no reason whatsoever, making certain build typologies weaker for literally no concrete reason.

Jhalin

“We’ve eliminated shared buffs across multiple abilities because we decided if you want those buffs you have to run this specifically ability, or you can buy our expac to get a better version of all your freshly reduced utility”

Basically ZOS says go RAT or go home

Myconos

At least minor expedition would be nice if we can't have two of the same buffs, although I don't think two sources of major expedition were unbalancing.

Nerftheforums

Myconos wrote: »

At least minor expedition would be nice if we can't have two of the same buffs, although I don't think two sources of major expedition were unbalancing.

No that's stamsorc's field, a buff unique to them that should stay that way. That class has nothing besides that buff, leave it as it is. I just want to not lose features we already have for no reason whatsoever.