Penalize Zergs

Rukzadlithau

idk wrote: »

usmguy1234 wrote: »

The amount of people in here defending their lack of skill is astounding.

Very true. This thread was created with the specific intent that OP's group cannot defeat the largest groups possible so they want the game designed around them.

In post #15 of this thread that becomes clear where he says a group of 4 could not take out a group of 20.

That is just a silly justification for this idea. The fact this thread has not made it into the second page after 4 days demonstrates how few think this is a good idea.

You write as if this was a law case but it does let your misinterpretation sound more legitimate in your twisted mind, amirite?

idk

Buzo wrote: »

idk wrote: »

usmguy1234 wrote: »

The amount of people in here defending their lack of skill is astounding.

Very true. This thread was created with the specific intent that OP's group cannot defeat the largest groups possible so they want the game designed around them.

In post #15 of this thread that becomes clear where he says a group of 4 could not take out a group of 20.

That is just a silly justification for this idea. The fact this thread has not made it into the second page after 4 days demonstrates how few think this is a good idea.

You write as if this was a law case but it does let your misinterpretation sound more legitimate in your twisted mind, amirite?

I take that as a compliment that you compared my statement to that worthy of a law case though I think I have fallen short. Of course I find it odd you attempt to characterize my statements as a misinterpretation since I used your very words of 4 men going against 20.

Clearly the only reasoning provided for the OP is that very small groups cannot handle the largest groups which supports my statement exactly which is what I expect you find inconvenient. Just as much as usmguy's comment.