The issues have been resolved, and the ESO Store and Account System are now available. Thank you for your patience!
The issue is resolved, and the North American and European megaservers are now available. Thank you for your patience!
Would you like to see a new PvP DLC / Expansion?
shaielzafine
✭✭✭✭✭
I've noticed a lot of people jumping into Cyrodiil and trying pvp out because of this Midyear Mayhem event. I'm curious if there's really no interest in new open world pvp map dlcs or an expansion with a new pvp map / pvp zone. Something possibly with new game modes like guild vs guild or group vs group, but it would be mainly a new open world pvp map / zone that is not Cyrodiil or 4v4v4 like Battlegrounds. It's been a while since we got Imperial City DLC.
Would you like to see a new PvP DLC / Expansion? 370 votes
Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.
61%
226 votes
No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.
31%
115 votes
Other
7%
29 votes
1
-
Kel✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Absolutely.
Couldn't throw money at Zos fast enough if this were to ever happen, as unlikely as it would be.Edited by Kel on August 6, 2018 3:12AM6 -
shaielzafine✭✭✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Absolutely.
Couldn't throw money at Zos fast enough if this were to ever happen, as unlikely as it would be.
To be honest I know a lot of pvpers that have just been waiting for a new map and for game performance improvements. I'd throw money at ZOS for a playable, well made pvp map / zone.4 -
Asgari✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Battlegrounds and dueling are decent additions but after all these years now we need a Cyrodiil 2.0 with reasons for people to come to the servers to keep the populations high like during the pvp event. It’s amazing!
@ZOS_GinaBrunoFormerly @Persian_Princess .. Now @Asgari
Princess Asgari | Sorc
Asgari | NB
-Asgari | Stamplar
Ariana Kishi | DK | True Liberator of Haderus
Banner Down!
No Mercy
Youtube: Asgari8 -
Lord_Sando✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.We need some kind of free for all area pvp mode and or a option to tun on pvp mode in the regular questing zones that would be the dream. Imagine true open world pvp a option i think most would use.1
-
Inhuman003✭✭✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.There's no question about it yes0 -
KittyHazWares✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Please take my money
Xbox One NA0 -
G1Countdown✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.I'd rather see more serious effort on fixing all of the issues with pvp. Between load screens, keep walls/doors mismatched, lag, pop-locked population issues, and the occasional crash I think ZOS has enough to work on before they release another pvp dlc.
Unless you want them to release a buggy broken pvp dlc and never go back and fix the issues...13 -
ArchMikem✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.I prefer PvE exploration.CP2,000 Master Explorer - AvA One Star General - Console Peasant - The Clan
Quest Objective: OMG Go Talk To That Kitty!4 -
Linaleah✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.its bad enough that 2 our of 4 DLC packs/expansions per year are near useless to me (dungeon DLC's). pvp expansion/DLC will make it so that only one DLC is something I can actualy fully partake in. personaly
now.. having some pvp features as PART of otherwise PVE pack, so that there is something for everyone? sure. (like Morrowind introducing battlegrounds for example) but another Imperial City. no. no. NO.
dirty worthless casual.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***10 -
Linaleah✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.Lord_Sando wrote: »We need some kind of free for all area pvp mode and or a option to tun on pvp mode in the regular questing zones that would be the dream. Imagine true open world pvp a option i think most would use.
nope. most would NOT actualy.dirty worthless casual.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***15 -
eso_lags✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.G1Countdown wrote: »I'd rather see more serious effort on fixing all of the issues with pvp. Between load screens, keep walls/doors mismatched, lag, pop-locked population issues, and the occasional crash I think ZOS has enough to work on before they release another pvp dlc.
Unless you want them to release a buggy broken pvp dlc and never go back and fix the issues...
They arent gonna fix anything anyway and will keep pushing out updates nonetheless... Might as well give us one
2 -
ganj1234✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.G1Countdown wrote: »I'd rather see more serious effort on fixing all of the issues with pvp. Between load screens, keep walls/doors mismatched, lag, pop-locked population issues, and the occasional crash I think ZOS has enough to work on before they release another pvp dlc.
Unless you want them to release a buggy broken pvp dlc and never go back and fix the issues...
we want more pvp options because we want pvp to be a larger part of the game so that it gets more attention.
Also, having additional pvp opportunities might split up the zergs as well as bring in new players. New players = more money for zos.
Edited by ganj1234 on August 6, 2018 6:12AM✿ @x.Elle_x - PC/NA DC magblade sweat and fashion extraordinaire✿ Guild: Black Fire1 -
eso_lags✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.its bad enough that 2 our of 4 DLC packs/expansions per year are near useless to me (dungeon DLC's). pvp expansion/DLC will make it so that only one DLC is something I can actualy fully partake in. personaly
now.. having some pvp features as PART of otherwise PVE pack, so that there is something for everyone? sure. (like Morrowind introducing battlegrounds for example) but another Imperial City. no. no. NO.
Ya it is bad enough isnt it.. sadly most people will use those dungeons but that doesnt apply to pvp players...
Let me ask you this, Do you think its fair to have 1 pvp dlc and nearly 10 pve ones?Edited by eso_lags on August 6, 2018 6:14AM1 -
ganj1234✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.its bad enough that 2 our of 4 DLC packs/expansions per year are near useless to me (dungeon DLC's). pvp expansion/DLC will make it so that only one DLC is something I can actualy fully partake in. personaly
now.. having some pvp features as PART of otherwise PVE pack, so that there is something for everyone? sure. (like Morrowind introducing battlegrounds for example) but another Imperial City. no. no. NO.
Ya it is bad enough isnt it.. sadly most people will use those dungeons but that doesnt apply to pvp players...
Let me ask you this, Do you think its fair to have 1 pvp dlc and nearly 10 pve ones?
imperial city definitely needs work. Hopefully that gets done regardless of what DLCs they choose to add✿ @x.Elle_x - PC/NA DC magblade sweat and fashion extraordinaire✿ Guild: Black Fire0 -
HappyLittleTree✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.I'm not that much into pvp. but i can see that pvp people need some more loving from zosThuu chakkuth lod Hajhiit c’oo? Hajhiit gortsuquth gorihuth thuu gooluthduj thdeitoluu!
XBox-EU3 -
Gythral✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.What needs to be done is work on the existing formats, sorting out the stability & making IC stand alone like Battlegrounds, not further diluting the population“Be as a tower, that, firmly set,
Shakes not its top for any blast that blows!”
Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy3 -
Linaleah✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.its bad enough that 2 our of 4 DLC packs/expansions per year are near useless to me (dungeon DLC's). pvp expansion/DLC will make it so that only one DLC is something I can actualy fully partake in. personaly
now.. having some pvp features as PART of otherwise PVE pack, so that there is something for everyone? sure. (like Morrowind introducing battlegrounds for example) but another Imperial City. no. no. NO.
Ya it is bad enough isnt it.. sadly most people will use those dungeons but that doesnt apply to pvp players...
Let me ask you this, Do you think its fair to have 1 pvp dlc and nearly 10 pve ones?
selfishly? yes.
objectively? this is why I said, pvp features should be one part of the DLCs that are released. what I will NOT like or support is pvp only DLC, and there is NOTHING that will change my mind, especially given my experiences with IC, up to and including missing out on majority of the story that actualy sounded interesting, what I managed to see of it - mainly because i couldn't even take a moment to enjoy it, must always watch out for the the lurking gankers, and don't even get me started on all the ways I HATE the way Tel Var is set up.
unless they replace one of the dungeon DLC's with it, but even then.. nyah.
dirty worthless casual.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***2 -
rexagamemnon✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Sure, after they fix the servers0 -
Marabornwingrion✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Imperial City is my favorite DLC6 -
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.We already have group vs group in BGs (and Cyrodiil).
The idea of adding something for the sake of adding it is a poor idea. We already have a second PvP zone in IC and it clearly has failed.3 -
PlagueSD✭✭✭✭✭
✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.New PVP mode:
No CP.
Players are stripped of armor and weapons.
All players have the same 5 abilities on their bars (no bar swapping, no Ultimate).
There...I just balanced PvP.7 -
Adernath✭✭✭✭✭OtherI think with the current system we have right now we are fine. We have one large scale scenario, one medium scale (IC) and small scale combat (BGs). The number one priority has to be to improve the networking performance first, and only then one can look of how the PvP community will grow in order to populate additional maps in sufficient numbers.
You see it already now during MM: The additional campaigns are not always full, in particular during night time. If we would have more content, it would only thin out the population on the PvP maps further.
But what should be improved, in my opinion, is the ability to queue into IC directly. Somehow IC instances should be separated from the rest of Cyrodiil.3 -
cjhhickman39✭✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Long overdue and greatly requested0 -
Danikat✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No, I'm not interested in any new PvP modes / maps.I wouldn't object to them releasing one, but it would be another DLC I'd skip because PvP just doesn't interest me. It tends to be the same few goals played out over and over and over for no purpose other than fighting for the sake of fighting or for some type of points system. Yes the actual combat can vary but without an overall story or progression (like unlocking new maps when you 'win' the one you're on) I just don't see the point to it.
I very rarely go to Cyrodiil and I've never done battlegrounds because I've tried the exact same format in other games and found it boring. I wouldn't have bought Imperial City except it was in the DLC pack and when I do go there it's purely for the PvE aspects.PC EU player | She/her/hers | PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!
"Remember in this game we call life that no one said it's fair"2 -
Jameliel✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Yes, but please fix what's already here first.1 -
Gulkrim-mur✭✭✭Yes, I would pay for a dlc / expansion focused on pvp.Lord_Sando wrote: »We need some kind of free for all area pvp mode and or a option to tun on pvp mode in the regular questing zones that would be the dream. Imagine true open world pvp a option i think most would use.
I always wonder why they don't have pvp servers with open pvp. I know alot of us jerks would just love to meteor that guy farming a node.
Could have kill-able guards guild's controlling the capital of zone own the territory. Along with small cities and settlements controllable too like enemy camps out there trying to take your land.
This could do alot for balancing issues for skills instead of comedaiting both pve and PvP they could function different on pve and PvP server.
Less pvp lag instead of zergs of thousands crammed in one area of cyrodiil pvpers would be spread across regions of the game fighting.2
