Any particular class where the player has committed and dedicated themselves to mastering that class whilst gaining insight and knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of the other classes.
This is why you have players who are "known" and feared/respected/hated/admired on every campaign - those players who get instantly zerged down (or tried to zerg them down) or avoided at all costs.
Put it this way - there are players from every single class, who make this thread obsolete. 1,000,000 stamblades DOES NOT = 1,000,000 super-killer assassins.
If you're getting reamed over and over by the same stamblade/magsorc/any other class = you still haven't mastered your own. That's not a bad thing, it means you are still learning your class. You may even be playing the wrong class. For example, I LOVE my nightblades (I have about 7 or 8 on ONE account lol) but I'm actually MUCH better playing magsorc - a class that I have only seriously been playing for the last 2-3 months. I'll never master the stamblade. But I think I stand a pretty good chance of mastering magsorc. Not today of course, but hopefully in the future.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
usmguy1234 wrote: »You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
Only death match cares about kill ratio... that aside Zos needs to look at damage done rather than who landed the killing blow on said person.
usmguy1234 wrote: »You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
Only death match cares about kill ratio... that aside Zos needs to look at damage done rather than who landed the killing blow on said person.
Definitely. It is incredibly frustrating having your kills stolen from an opposing team. But when it comes to BGs I'm only talking about deathmatch since I'm not a big fan of this game's objective matches. Which judging from the fact that my random BGs are almost exclusively deathmatch; I think it's safe to assume that most people would agree with me.
usmguy1234 wrote: »usmguy1234 wrote: »You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
Only death match cares about kill ratio... that aside Zos needs to look at damage done rather than who landed the killing blow on said person.
Definitely. It is incredibly frustrating having your kills stolen from an opposing team. But when it comes to BGs I'm only talking about deathmatch since I'm not a big fan of this game's objective matches. Which judging from the fact that my random BGs are almost exclusively deathmatch; I think it's safe to assume that most people would agree with me.
It varies for me... can have 3-4 dm in a row or just a few per session. I don't bg very often so it may be something to do with my ranking. I usually only bg for daily or if cyrodilll is an absolute cf.
usmguy1234 wrote: »usmguy1234 wrote: »You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
Only death match cares about kill ratio... that aside Zos needs to look at damage done rather than who landed the killing blow on said person.
Definitely. It is incredibly frustrating having your kills stolen from an opposing team. But when it comes to BGs I'm only talking about deathmatch since I'm not a big fan of this game's objective matches. Which judging from the fact that my random BGs are almost exclusively deathmatch; I think it's safe to assume that most people would agree with me.
It varies for me... can have 3-4 dm in a row or just a few per session. I don't bg very often so it may be something to do with my ranking. I usually only bg for daily or if cyrodilll is an absolute cf.
I'm glad we have the options to PvP in both context :-)
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
You didn’t include stamblade in the poll options...
Is OP a stamblade?
It’s still the class all the bad players play. And some good players too. But it’s still the only class easy enough to carry the bottom of the barrel.
Is a stamblade really a class you typically hope to be queued with in BGs? I'd rather have a magsorc, Stam Warden, Stam sorc, or a magicka Templar on my team any day. Obviously you'll have renown stamblades that you know will do some damage, but that can be said about any class.
Don’t confuse the fact that most stamblades are bad players with stamblades are underpowered. It’s by far the strongest solo class in the game, and the strongest Xv1 class. Dueling? Close but not really... but that’s assuming “rules” are followed. Throw out rules and the NB can just force a stalemate every time.
The reason most stamblades are bad players is because it’s the only class they can play and not get instantly blown up..
Would I want a NB on my team? Hell no. It’s a solo class and the BGs are team based. But while I’m getting sload slapped, incapped, and sorc zapped, the NB is cloaking around stealing my kills and having a grand old time while I’m being used as a piñata by the enemy teams.
But good NBs can play as a team.
I'm not disagreeing with you, stamblades are incredibly powerful; easily one of the strongest specs (I would put them just below magblade personally). I wouldn't consider them a candidate for king of PvP though. The king of being annoying and cowardly? Yup!
Well it really depends on context. Stamblades are the most capable in the most contexts... but sure, in a GvG tourney you wont see them being used a ton.
Excatly. For example I see OP in main post using term "no-counterplay magsorcs" , well yeah in 1v1 in CP enviroment it would be some kind correct statement but in non CP Cyrodill they're easily counterable and they shine only in BG's as execute spammers from behind. Context is really important.
If the context was 1v1 then it wouldn't even be debatable; magSorcs would win. But the question was about PvP; not dueling. magSorcs are incredibly powerful in BGs because they steal kills from both teams with minimal effort giving the team with the magsorcs an unfair advantage.
Stam Wardens can decimate groups with a Subterranean Assault + DBoS -> Reverse Slice combo which is incredibly powerful for small scale and large scale PvP.
And everyone always thinks about only damage. Probably one of the strongest specs in the game is the magplar. They'll keep you healed, give you resources, and a free purge to synergize. This spec is insanely powerful.
MagDKs not only hit hard, but are CC machines with their roots and scares. Not to mention they put out a ton of pressure with all of their DoTs.
And just like how magplars are powerful in terms of group support; Nightblades are great priority target killers; which if successfully could potentially turn the tide of the entire fight in their team's favor.
So yes, context is absolutely important. I only specifically called out magSorcs and Stam Wardens because of their efficiency to acquire multiple kills in most situations. But I put that third option because depending on their class and perspective the answer to them could certainly be something other than what I mentioned.
The scenarios where a metta magplar build is preferable and far and few between.