Would you want a 4 piece set implemented in next patch?

Megabear

Potenza

Yes

Yes because it could create more diversity

redshirt_49

No

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

Danksta

Other

More 3 piece sets like agility/willpower plz.

josiahva

Yes

I want sets all the way from 1-12 pieces with the set bonus power scaling with the number of pieces you have equipped of it. This way you will get weak bonuses from 1-2 piece sets...but extremely strong bonuses from a 11-12 piece set. The tradeoff is of course that if you get a strong 8 piece bonus, your options for filling the rest of the slots are fairly weak. It would be tricky to balance, but would be a nice boost to build diversity.

Danksta wrote: »

More 3 piece sets like agility/willpower plz.

Hell no...that's a terrible idea...weapon/jewelry sets already make it difficult to efficiently use the available slots. I don't mind 3 piece sets...but let them go beyond weapons and jewelry.

Nyghthowler

No

I voted no because a certain crowd will find something to *female dog*, whine, and complain about and start demanding more nerfs. Why ask for more item sets when the ones we have are either crap to begin with, or constantly having holes poked in them to appease a certain minority of sub gamer.

Phica_Lovic

No

josiahva wrote: »

I want sets all the way from 1-12 pieces with the set bonus power scaling with the number of pieces you have equipped of it. This way you will get weak bonuses from 1-2 piece sets...but extremely strong bonuses from a 11-12 piece set. The tradeoff is of course that if you get a strong 8 piece bonus, your options for filling the rest of the slots are fairly weak. It would be tricky to balance, but would be a nice boost to build diversity.

Double no. 12 piece set sounds... like a set of gear.

Megabear

Yes

I don't like using just 1 of 2 monster set =/

Spacemonkey

No

I want less sets.

I'd rather see complete NON (specifically) set pieces being able to be upgraded past Legendary (Mythic??), to counter balance Sets. Or trait upgrading (specifically again, if not a set piece), or in the same mindset, double enchanting possible on non set pieces (all ideas entirely debatable)

My problem with Sets its that it puts a lot of calculations everywhere. Normal 'stat' sets, arent that bad but Proc sets are a nightmare, and its put me being against sets as a general rule. There are too many sets already, a lot of them being complete piles of cliff racer droppings, I really dont feel MORE sets is something needed. I want to improve my gear, non constantly swap it. But thats only what I want. A single drop in a rainstorm.

But yeah, all that is why I answered no.

Ch4mpTW

Yes

I personally don't see why not.

josiahva

Yes

Phica_Lovic wrote: »

josiahva wrote: »

I want sets all the way from 1-12 pieces with the set bonus power scaling with the number of pieces you have equipped of it. This way you will get weak bonuses from 1-2 piece sets...but extremely strong bonuses from a 11-12 piece set. The tradeoff is of course that if you get a strong 8 piece bonus, your options for filling the rest of the slots are fairly weak. It would be tricky to balance, but would be a nice boost to build diversity.

Double no. 12 piece set sounds... like a set of gear.

and that's different than what we have...how?

KeiruNicrom

Other

I want a 7 piece set. Only comes in armour but gives huge bonuses that makes hybrid on any class possible

Kay1

redshirt_49 wrote: »

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

I swear I am never tired of the amount of *** I read in these forums

Danksta

Other

josiahva wrote: »

I want sets all the way from 1-12 pieces with the set bonus power scaling with the number of pieces you have equipped of it. This way you will get weak bonuses from 1-2 piece sets...but extremely strong bonuses from a 11-12 piece set. The tradeoff is of course that if you get a strong 8 piece bonus, your options for filling the rest of the slots are fairly weak. It would be tricky to balance, but would be a nice boost to build diversity.

Danksta wrote: »

More 3 piece sets like agility/willpower plz.

Hell no...that's a terrible idea...weapon/jewelry sets already make it difficult to efficiently use the available slots. I don't mind 3 piece sets...but let them go beyond weapons and jewelry.

3 piece jewelry, 5 piece armor, 2 piece monster set, Maelstrom/Master weapons. Man, that was incredibly difficult, you're right.

eso_nya

Other

Yes for diversity, no cause i prolly wont need it, as there r other options:
- 5 pc, 4 ia, 2 monster (staff/staff)
- 5pc, 5 md, 1 kena or iceheart (staff/staff)
- 5-5-2 monster on dw/bow
- 5-5-1 krag on 2h/bow

FerrumnCutem

redshirt_49 wrote: »

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

Aka Maelstrom and Master weapons :P

SnubbS

Spacemonkey wrote: »

I want less sets.

I'd rather see complete NON (specifically) set pieces being able to be upgraded past Legendary (Mythic??), to counter balance Sets. Or trait upgrading (specifically again, if not a set piece), or in the same mindset, double enchanting possible on non set pieces (all ideas entirely debatable)

My problem with Sets its that it puts a lot of calculations everywhere. Normal 'stat' sets, arent that bad but Proc sets are a nightmare, and its put me being against sets as a general rule. There are too many sets already, a lot of them being complete piles of cliff racer droppings, I really dont feel MORE sets is something needed. I want to improve my gear, non constantly swap it. But thats only what I want. A single drop in a rainstorm.

But yeah, all that is why I answered no.

redshirt_49 wrote: »

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

What am I reading?

Megabear

Yes

SnubbS wrote: »

Spacemonkey wrote: »

I want less sets.

I'd rather see complete NON (specifically) set pieces being able to be upgraded past Legendary (Mythic??), to counter balance Sets. Or trait upgrading (specifically again, if not a set piece), or in the same mindset, double enchanting possible on non set pieces (all ideas entirely debatable)

My problem with Sets its that it puts a lot of calculations everywhere. Normal 'stat' sets, arent that bad but Proc sets are a nightmare, and its put me being against sets as a general rule. There are too many sets already, a lot of them being complete piles of cliff racer droppings, I really dont feel MORE sets is something needed. I want to improve my gear, non constantly swap it. But thats only what I want. A single drop in a rainstorm.

But yeah, all that is why I answered no.

redshirt_49 wrote: »

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

What am I reading?

This.



*Courtesy of another forum user that I borrowed from.

Kay1

Megabear wrote: »

SnubbS wrote: »

Spacemonkey wrote: »

I want less sets.

I'd rather see complete NON (specifically) set pieces being able to be upgraded past Legendary (Mythic??), to counter balance Sets. Or trait upgrading (specifically again, if not a set piece), or in the same mindset, double enchanting possible on non set pieces (all ideas entirely debatable)

My problem with Sets its that it puts a lot of calculations everywhere. Normal 'stat' sets, arent that bad but Proc sets are a nightmare, and its put me being against sets as a general rule. There are too many sets already, a lot of them being complete piles of cliff racer droppings, I really dont feel MORE sets is something needed. I want to improve my gear, non constantly swap it. But thats only what I want. A single drop in a rainstorm.

But yeah, all that is why I answered no.

redshirt_49 wrote: »

Monster sets are bad enough already. Why not just make items with a 1-item set bonus, too? Make set bonuses too easy to get and thoughtful selection of which sets to run goes out the window.

What am I reading?

This.



*Courtesy of another forum user that I borrowed from.

That one was good I borrow it too

gpreid81

Yes

Only for you two handers to get the same perks as every one else

Morgul667

No

No because i think there would be unbalance issues

T1y4hoon

Dude just stop posting wth

PlagueSD

Other

You want a 4pc set. Equip 4 pieces of a 5-pc set. DONE.

I know where you're going with this and NO, 2h should NOT count as 2pc item.

STEVIL

Yes

As crafted only.

Nemesis7884

No

honestly i think they should stay at 2, 3, 5 - the more different set structures you offer the more complex balancing will become - and its already now a nightmare and questionable... i'd rather see them make

a) monster masks available through different means and

b.) maybe allow for some craftable 2 and 3 piece sets and

c) maybe have some monster mask sets that actually look like armor because i think they are all extremely ugly (maybe this gets solved with transmog)

GeorgeBlack

Other

Jewelry crafting.
That way 2h weapon users can have a bigger selection to work with and stop trying to gain the bonuses of a dual handed weapon without justification other than greed.

BraidasNM

Yes

more options the better

Phica_Lovic

No

josiahva wrote: »

Phica_Lovic wrote: »

josiahva wrote: »

I want sets all the way from 1-12 pieces with the set bonus power scaling with the number of pieces you have equipped of it. This way you will get weak bonuses from 1-2 piece sets...but extremely strong bonuses from a 11-12 piece set. The tradeoff is of course that if you get a strong 8 piece bonus, your options for filling the rest of the slots are fairly weak. It would be tricky to balance, but would be a nice boost to build diversity.

Double no. 12 piece set sounds... like a set of gear.

and that's different than what we have...how?

We chose our sets currently. Between a 5-5-1, 5-5-2, a 5-3-2 (and vMAs), etc.

Add sets 1-12 piece... is going to what? Make that easier?

No. The 12 piece sets will be for the noobz cuz they dunno how to toon build. PVP and PVE meta will be a mix of a few sets, and everyone will copy and paste just like they do now.

Wait? You're farming viper? NO WAY. NO ONE FARMS THAT OR EVEN WEARS IT.