Should we have 70 attribute points

bloodthirstyvampire

64 seams like an odd number

Danksta

No

64 is actually an even number.

notimetocare

Different

Bigger question, why does this really matter? lol. 600 total stat points?

bloodthirstyvampire

Yes

Danksta wrote: »

64 is actually an even number.

Stop your makin me laugh

kargen27

Thou shalt have 64 attribute points no more no less. Thou shalt not have 65 nor shalt thou have 63 except to get to 64. 66 is right out....

Sigtric

Different

It is because that's how many there were prior to Vet Ranks being removed. You got 1 point for every level starting at 2, but lvl 50 and Vet 1 was the same level, so it only got 1.

50 levels + 16 Vet Ranks - level 1 - 1 for 50 and VR1 being the same = 64

dsalter

Different

just buff how much health you get from health points then put a cap of only 40 points max into an attribute so they cant go 60 stam/magicka and 4 health because christ i hate healing those guys

Trashkan

bloodthirstyvampire wrote: »

Danksta wrote: »

64 is actually an even number.

Stop your makin me laugh

Hahahahahaha!!!!!!

Vipstaakki

No

There's 64 blocks in a stack of wood in Minecraft..

Karmanorway

Different

We should get a point for each lvl, both normal and cp lvls. Like why should a cp 160 that played for a few months wipe out cp capped players thats played for years, just beacuse they have better sets

Tyrobag

Yes

OCD

Oompuh

Different

Sure.. if we take away stat gains from CP

idk

No

The number of attributes corresponds to the number of points we had at V16 which is where are gear level has been held.

Danika

No

For now i say no, but will let you know if and when i reach 64 ap...

KochDerDamonen

No

64x bit operating :^)

MehrunesFlagon

dsalter wrote: »

just buff how much health you get from health points then put a cap of only 40 points max into an attribute so they cant go 60 stam/magicka and 4 health because christ i hate healing those guys

Oh, hell no.I hate that meta more than anything. Some *** that probably can't even finish the dungeon telling me my dps needs health would be annoying as hell. I play dps to do damage not to tank.

leepalmer95

Karmanorway wrote: »

We should get a point for each lvl, both normal and cp lvls. Like why should a cp 160 that played for a few months wipe out cp capped players thats played for years, just beacuse they have better sets

I'm sensing you've been wiped out by a lower cp player a few times, seen you post this a few times as well.

You have a big advantage via cp if your not competent as a player and the lower cp is a good player you deserve to lose. Thats pvp.

Trying dueling or running small group instead of the zerging you've been doing since you joined pvp.

Banana

No

Why not 100

bebynnag

dsalter wrote: »

just buff how much health you get from health points then put a cap of only 40 points max into an attribute so they cant go 60 stam/magicka and 4 health because christ i hate healing those guys

fair enough, because the good players who go all mag or stam are either dd'ing tanking & self healing in vMA or are doing their pledges solo!

Skitttles

Different

How about 69 lel

SJD_Phoenix

leepalmer95 wrote: »

Karmanorway wrote: »

We should get a point for each lvl, both normal and cp lvls. Like why should a cp 160 that played for a few months wipe out cp capped players thats played for years, just beacuse they have better sets

I'm sensing you've been wiped out by a lower cp player a few times, seen you post this a few times as well.

You have a big advantage via cp if your not competent as a player and the lower cp is a good player you deserve to lose. Thats pvp.

Trying dueling or running small group instead of the zerging you've been doing since you joined pvp.

FS you beat me to it :')

He's right though, sometimes it happens because the lower CP player is a superior player. Man, I've beaten max CP players on a level 5 toon, not because the toon is overpowered but because that max cp was absolute trash that didn't know how to fight another player 1v1.

It rarely happens so it can't be that much of an issue though.

TheRealPotoroo

Different

I would prefer the number be divisible by three but I don't lose any sleep over it.

Sheey

Yes

Oh ***, forgot to set my attributes the entire time

MrCray78

Different

10 CP = 1 Attribut Point

leepalmer95

MrCray78 wrote: »

10 CP = 1 Attribut Point

So no attributes for 1-50?


We get 64 because of how vet ranks worked before they was removed. Zos left us with 64 so we didn't lose any stat points and get weaker.


But with the power creep in this game and the fact they've been trying to lower peoples ability i doubt they'd give out free extra stats. Wouldn't make a difference anyway.

Stannum

Different

With scaling system attr points have no any point. You can just have slide bars to define % for each resource.

BTW current system is pretty frustrating aspeccially when char hits lev 50 and looses tons of resource pools (And best DPS builds could be made on fortieth levels with proper gear cause of that resource pools differens). E.g. when i leveled magWarden few days ago on 48-49 lev with level 40 all training purple gear and 37-38 level arcane jewellery, heaving 6x-0-0 attr I had over 45k magika and 20-21k health. When i've hit lev 50 with 64-0-0 I've got <42k magika and <16k health in CP160 golden gear (2 parts infused) and CP160 purple arcane jewellery.

AdamBourke

Different

I think we should have 50, 60, 70 or 75

Turelus

Danksta wrote: »

64 is actually an even number.

Well played, well played.

Personally until attributes become something more than "all in one stat because it's most powerful" I don't see the need for more of them.

The odd number is because of the carry over from vet ranks right? Where we used to continue to get attributes after 50, then when they gutted the ranks they couldn't take attributes away (why?) so they just made some levels worth more.

Belidos

Just make it a round 100.

randomkeyhits

No

As its a power of 2, 2^6 in fact its an elegant number anyway.

SilverWF

Different

Stop making pointless polls, please.