What horse are you talking about, OP?
TheWhiteDarkness wrote: »Just checked, it's the palomino horse.
daroule1982 wrote: »What horse are you talking about, OP?
Yes,TheWhiteDarkness wrote: »Just checked, it's the palomino horse.
I have been building a likeness character to Link of Zelda, and couldn't find a way to get the horse that fit the style.Whilst, I support Zenimax (And their endeavor to make funds to develop, and maintain the game.) I find it unfair to those that spent money for all of the original content to wave a 2015 horse in front of us without buying out a whole new game. I don't think this was done on purpose. I just felt that it should be addressed. Also, realize I am not leaning on the free option. I just think it would be fair to offer the mount in the crown store, and that it is unjust to have to pay x amount of dollars for a new account, when your primary account is already world known.
TheWhiteDarkness wrote: »Just checked, it's the palomino horse.
I have a palamino I bought it in the crown store. It was there for idk about 9 months maybe longer? It only stopped being sold a few months ago, why didn't you buy it then if you wanted it?
I think it's fair to give them a horse, thr imperial edition had a horse and a Mara scroll - it was one reason I ordered it . I think I also got the adventure pack too I preordered 14 months prior and it kept getting set back that was I guess my perk for waiting over a year, I know I got something and I rode that piebald deserter for months. Little perks sell things
Point is I should be upset I bought the horse, and all the dlcs But I'm not because it brings in new customers. and that keeps the game going. the horse was available for a long time too, if it was limited and expensive I'd feel differently but that Palamino is exactly the type of perk mount that should be given away as a bundle. And if they give it away for free then people like me who bought the mount and the dlcs suffer.
Folks if you have not seen through ZOS's game plan then I feel sorry for you. They will continue to offer bundles with a special item attached to force players to purchase the the entire bundle to get that special item. Doesn't matter that many already own parts of the bundles they offer or in the case of subscribers who get access because of their subs it its all about the money. A good example was the recent IC bundle which offered the horse and skin. The catch was you had to also purchase the IC DLC. Many players already owned the DLC or got the DLC via their subscription so if you wanted the special items purchase the DLC again. Does not make any sense but it is ZOS you are dealing with.
daroule1982 wrote: »Ok, this will be my final response on this forum. Unless someone calls me out on a question or something.)
To clarify, I am not upset about there being a mount with the dlc. (Guild & Glory) The thing that upsets me is that I own all the dlc and cannot get the mount on my account because there is no option available. And, now it seems that Zenimax took the mount away all together. Well, crud. That fixed nothing, and now it gained another issue. Now people that have gotten the mount already from the bundle have the mount, and the people who get the bundle now have no option. Oh well, now there T-1 to look forward to.
Just know this. Whenever including a mount in the future please put up an option to gain the mount for people who already have the dlc, or whatever is needed. A no option at all is very lame.
Caius Drusus Imperial DK (DC) Bragg Ironhand Orc Temp (DC) Neesha Stalks-Shadows Argonian NB (EP) Falidir Altmer Sorcr (AD) J'zharka Khajiit NB (AD) |
Isabeau Runeseer Breton Sorc (DC) Fevassa Dunmer DK (EP) Manut Redguard Temp (AD) Tylera the Summoner Altmer Sorc (EP) Svari Snake-Blood Nord DK (AD) |
Ashlyn D'Elyse Breton NB (EP) Filindria Bosmer Temp (DC) Vigbjorn the Wanderer Nord Warden (EP) Hrokki Winterborn Breton Warden (DC) Basks-in-the-Sunshine Argonian Temp |