Do the changes to Malubeth satisfy you?

UltimaJoe777

So the following changes have been made to Malubeth:



Is this what everyone has been wanting or is it not enough? Feel free to discuss!

Mady

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

This

Voxicity

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

I sure hope so

psychotic13

Hmm, but you can still stack major mending with vitality pots and Malubeth?

BruhItsOver9000

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

Good riddance with that cancerous set.

Rohamad_Ali

Yes, this will make it so much less hated!

Kas

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

let's see, imho it could remain very strong (in an unbugged way, though) but a good choice to break (e.g. long duration, very low proc chance, reduced ranged). from the patchnotes it seems it will be a bit easier to ignore it and it's OP'ness, but I don't really think it's beneficial to move back 6m (let alone spend stamina to dodge) and re-engage.

So: great that they're fixing a broken set, but i'm a bit said that playing well isn't really supposed to be the counter

Ankael07

No, I still think it's OP.

The problem wasnt 10 meters of beam range. It was the fact that you could have multiple beams active at a time and being able to stack its healing bonus with vitality+ major mending

SleepyTroll

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

I wish they would have given the set major vitality, since its the equivalent already and it would have stopped the stacking hatred. Going to be honest too, I didn't even know the set had a cool down until today.

raasdal

Yes, this will make it so much less hated!

SleepyTroll wrote: »

I wish they would have given the set major vitality, since its the equivalent already and it would have stopped the stacking hatred. Going to be honest too, I didn't even know the set had a cool down until today.

The cooldown was shorter than the actual beam, so it could proc back to back.

Ankael07 wrote: »

The problem wasnt 10 meters of beam range. It was the fact that you could have multiple beams active at a time and being able to stack its healing bonus with vitality+ major mending

It was never able to have multiple beams active. Have at least never seen any evidence of this, whatsoever.

I am hoping that line 3 is fixing what was the real problem with the set, which is the fact that the base heal tick from the proc (before any buffs) would be anywhere from 500 to 2000, making it tick for insane HPS.

IF this fixes that problem, and it will now consistently heal for the appropriate 500 base heal per tick, i will be very happy. The set will be strong in the correct build, stacking heals, but will not be OP broken.

Erock25

People are clueless about why everyone had an issue with malubeth. The only relevant patch note about malubeth is that they fixed an issue where the amount healed could be based on a different source of damage besides the beam. THAT'S IT. Making the heal buff Major Mending or Major Vitality would have been fine but no other nerfs were necessary. This set is actually underpowered in its non-bugged form. People were too lazy to figure out the main issue was the bug and not just that the set was op.

Erock25

Ankael07 wrote: »

The problem wasnt 10 meters of beam range. It was the fact that you could have multiple beams active at a time and being able to stack its healing bonus with vitality+ major mending

You could not have multiple beams active at one time.

stevepdodson_ESO888

Erock25 wrote: »

People are clueless about why everyone had an issue with malubeth. The only relevant patch note about malubeth is that they fixed an issue where the amount healed could be based on a different source of damage besides the beam. THAT'S IT. Making the heal buff Major Mending or Major Vitality would have been fine but no other nerfs were necessary. This set is actually underpowered in its non-bugged form. People were too lazy to figure out the main issue was the bug and not just that the set was op.

this +1

and it was never OP in PvE anyway

silky_soft

No, I still think it's OP.

No major buff removing the op af stacking?

Ok I want 3 different % damage buffs so I can spam 24k damage just like their 24k bol.

Paraflex

Yes, this will make it so much less hated!

I like the changes well have to wait and see on the long term of the set. It procs less, has less ranged, and the beams have good adjustments that are balanced. This is a step in the right direction and we should not see 60%+ of the population running this set.

Minalan

I'm not sure, I need time to see if it helps or not...

Paraflex wrote: »

I like the changes well have to wait and see on the long term of the set. It procs less, has less ranged, and the beams have good adjustments that are balanced. This is a step in the right direction and we should not see 60%+ of the population running this set.

No, just Templars healing to full every six seconds.

We'll see how it turns out. Every bug ZOS 'fixes' leaves 5 more things broken.