I think if dueling were to be put in it should be done in a fashion where folks could also go and observe the matches from the stands and bet on the matches.
ChibiMechaX78 wrote: »I think if dueling were to be put in it should be done in a fashion where folks could also go and observe the matches from the stands and bet on the matches.
Kinda like those troll duels in the game?
Interesting as it would be, I doubt ZOS would add a UI to allow us to do that. I see it more probable that we are allowed to duel, and for the rest of us set up the dueling tourneys ourselves. Then we'd set up the bets. Though I must admit, an actual Arena set up just for us to duel, and bet sounds more official, and approachable.
McSwaggins wrote: »its what everyone wants
No, Its not. Its what YOU want. A few vocal people on a forum does not make your statement even close to true.
Go play WoW with their arena. Thats a nice fair playing field.......
Small scale PvP is utterly unbalanced, this game was sold as RvR which IS balanced.
If this game is not for you, then find a game that it is, don't try to turn this game into a clone of a subpar game.
Change is good for a game, but mirroring what was bad in other games is not.
Wow! So many fallacies in what you said
1. How do you know that's not what the majority wants? Did you take a poll?
2. WoW is not the only mmo with an arena and battle grounds.. Btw, taking a few pointers from a game with millions of subs is not a bad thing
3. Small scale pvp is unbalanced? Are you an expert on game balance now? Have you tested it? Do you feel that our current lag fest, Zerg vs Zerg is balanced?
4. A simple request for a common mmo feature is not a bad thing or makes this game into a clone of anything.
5. "Mirroring what was bad in other games". That's purely your opinion, but again, these are common mmo features and it's not an outlandish request to have arenas, battlegrounds and a dueling option. You may not like it for some reason, but it being "bad" is simply your opinion. Not everyone has to like what you like
This arena was played during Quakecon 2014. Prototype? Think again.Because we've got Cyrodiil and IC coming up. Having a prototype does not means it's ready and good to implement in the game.
McSwaggins wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR1ccuyGCwA
why isn't this in ESO yet like come on, its what everyone wants and they made it a year ago and still didn't add it.
Waffennacht wrote: »How can people,be against adding something optional???
Seth_Black wrote: »Maybe ZOS doesn't want people focus ONLY on dueling?
So many pvp maniacs out there crying about it since all they want is 1v1
and Cyrodiil is about whatever available vs whatever comes.
Tbh this system is way better and people need to engage into something bigger than
'Ego Booster' in form of duels. Just face it ...you all want to beat someone to feel better...
If they will ever fall for this stupid idea I hope it will be completely different zone, so this will free
rest of the players from queues we've got now.
or just make another game Mortal Kombat ESO
johan.danielsson1994b16_ESO wrote: »People are worried about Cyrodiil populations but IC will be free to enter no matter what the state the map is and it does not matter which keeps you control in order to gain acess.. Cyrodiil will be close to a dead zone cus theres no reason to play there in terms of rewards. Instead we will be stuck with TDM endless respawns PvP in the districts that are... quite boring.
Arenas are something thats should´ve been in the game for a long time already, im not sure i can even imagine my skills popping off without 10 FPS and 999+ ping anymore though.
Waffennacht wrote: »How can people,be against adding something optional???
Personally I'm against it because even if I didn't play it, balance changes to cater to 1v1 combat would still alter skills I use in PVE or the existing PVP.
Im only for duels if there are not any rewards for it. No gear no ap just for fun so people would Still have a reason to go to cyrodiil so it doesnt become a ghost town
QuebraRegra wrote: »Waffennacht wrote: »How can people,be against adding something optional???
Personally I'm against it because even if I didn't play it, balance changes to cater to 1v1 combat would still alter skills I use in PVE or the existing PVP.
Not necessarily... The arenas could have "rules" (balance) options which could be selected when creating a match. Balance could be determined by the participants of a given match without impacting the larger game.