I can't see why they would have anything to do with eachother. besides limited time cash shop items is a thing used in pretty much every game with a cash shop
I can't see why they would have anything to do with eachother. besides limited time cash shop items is a thing used in pretty much every game with a cash shop
It is just strange that they use the slogan unlimited to attack people back in the game and when they are in their web they rush them with limited contain... ?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
because they decided to have limited time content sometimes, they got plenty of mounts in the shop too that you can buy whenever you want.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
because they decided to have limited time content sometimes, they got plenty of mounts in the shop too that you can buy whenever you want.
So you are telling me if you could not afford this mount this month and it was the one you desire and know it would be gone before you can afford it you would be ok with it? Should I be ok with it then?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
because they decided to have limited time content sometimes, they got plenty of mounts in the shop too that you can buy whenever you want.
So you are telling me if you could not afford this mount this month and it was the one you desire and know it would be gone before you can afford it you would be ok with it? Should I be ok with it then?
Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
No. Capitalism works on the basis of bottom lines. If people recognize this for what it is (a purely artificial gimmick and marketing ploy) and boycott limited-time content, ZOS will stop adding it to the store and people can happily go about spending their crowns in other stuff.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
Then your only option is to overthrow the system, because this is how capitalism works.
No. Capitalism works on the basis of bottom lines. If people recognize this for what it is (a purely artificial gimmick and marketing ploy) and boycott limited-time content, ZOS will stop adding it to the store and people can happily go about spending their crowns in other stuff.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
Then your only option is to overthrow the system, because this is how capitalism works.
I agree with OP, though I also think the thread title isn't the most appropriate. Time-limited offers are particularly offensive (for me) with regard to digital content. It's not like they have to wait for senche cubs to be born somewhere far away, bring them over in bulk and sell them. These are pixels and bits, nothing more. They have full control of what goes in the store, when and for what price. I'm a subscriber since early access and have kept my sub, I could have bought the leopard but refuse to validate these tactics. I may be in the minority, but who knows? Maybe more people will sit on their crowns until some actual content shows up in the store.
No. Capitalism works on the basis of bottom lines. If people recognize this for what it is (a purely artificial gimmick and marketing ploy) and boycott limited-time content, ZOS will stop adding it to the store and people can happily go about spending their crowns in other stuff.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
Then your only option is to overthrow the system, because this is how capitalism works.
I agree with OP, though I also think the thread title isn't the most appropriate. Time-limited offers are particularly offensive (for me) with regard to digital content. It's not like they have to wait for senche cubs to be born somewhere far away, bring them over in bulk and sell them. These are pixels and bits, nothing more. They have full control of what goes in the store, when and for what price. I'm a subscriber since early access and have kept my sub, I could have bought the leopard but refuse to validate these tactics. I may be in the minority, but who knows? Maybe more people will sit on their crowns until some actual content shows up in the store.
limited content like this gives off the feeling of having something "unique" that you can show off.
No. Capitalism works on the basis of bottom lines. If people recognize this for what it is (a purely artificial gimmick and marketing ploy) and boycott limited-time content, ZOS will stop adding it to the store and people can happily go about spending their crowns in other stuff.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
Then your only option is to overthrow the system, because this is how capitalism works.
I agree with OP, though I also think the thread title isn't the most appropriate. Time-limited offers are particularly offensive (for me) with regard to digital content. It's not like they have to wait for senche cubs to be born somewhere far away, bring them over in bulk and sell them. These are pixels and bits, nothing more. They have full control of what goes in the store, when and for what price. I'm a subscriber since early access and have kept my sub, I could have bought the leopard but refuse to validate these tactics. I may be in the minority, but who knows? Maybe more people will sit on their crowns until some actual content shows up in the store.
limited content like this gives off the feeling of having something "unique" that you can show off.
But what make you better than me or anyone else if you have it? Why couldn't I? I am a subscriber also. It's just not the right week for me but next week no problem! In a way it's about being able to always afford something at the moment it's announce and other time it's about luck that you can afford it the moment they decide to show it... 4 days to get something that is 25$ also... and much more if you are in Canada near the end of the month doesn't give you much time. Usually when game company bring the "limited time only" it's more than week to give everyone time to get at least a pay check (which is usually 2 weeks).
nerevarine1138 wrote: »No. Capitalism works on the basis of bottom lines. If people recognize this for what it is (a purely artificial gimmick and marketing ploy) and boycott limited-time content, ZOS will stop adding it to the store and people can happily go about spending their crowns in other stuff.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Full Definition of GAME
1
a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement :
Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interaction. Games generally involve mental or physical stimulation, and often both. Many games help develop practical skills, serve as a form of exercise, or otherwise perform an educational, simulational, or psychological role.
Where is the achievement or reward (goal) involve in never be able to get something you want in a game where other could at that moment because it is limited? There is many horses for example yes but only 1 feline mount... and it's a limited thus if you feel it's your goal to get it but because of real-life finance you cannot at this moment thus your game pleasure drop for not being able to achieve your goal for limiting the time in hope they get as much as they can in a specific time. It's sad that game rewards now are often put in favor for real life term than in-game context term.
Then your only option is to overthrow the system, because this is how capitalism works.
I agree with OP, though I also think the thread title isn't the most appropriate. Time-limited offers are particularly offensive (for me) with regard to digital content. It's not like they have to wait for senche cubs to be born somewhere far away, bring them over in bulk and sell them. These are pixels and bits, nothing more. They have full control of what goes in the store, when and for what price. I'm a subscriber since early access and have kept my sub, I could have bought the leopard but refuse to validate these tactics. I may be in the minority, but who knows? Maybe more people will sit on their crowns until some actual content shows up in the store.
limited content like this gives off the feeling of having something "unique" that you can show off.
But what make you better than me or anyone else if you have it? Why couldn't I? I am a subscriber also. It's just not the right week for me but next week no problem! In a way it's about being able to always afford something at the moment it's announce and other time it's about luck that you can afford it the moment they decide to show it... 4 days to get something that is 25$ also... and much more if you are in Canada near the end of the month doesn't give you much time. Usually when game company bring the "limited time only" it's more than week to give everyone time to get at least a pay check (which is usually 2 weeks).
No one is claiming to be "better" than you.
I'd love to get the leopard. I don't have the money to do so. So I act like an adult and move on, knowing that there will be other things to buy in the future.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
Zershar_Vemod wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »Can't tell if the OP is being serious...
The question is why limited? Why not just keep it there and let people buy it when they can?
When you are old enough, take a marketing class at a university.
Why is this surprising? ZOS failed making a monthly sub game; no one wanted to actually pay money for this. Now they are failing at the next step; Free to buy then play. The last step after this implementation fails is totally free to play and download, followed by Free to stare at your expensive box when they shut down the servers. That will be next year...