starkerealm wrote: »NeillMcAttack wrote: »TheBardAtTheInn wrote: »If I'm understanding this right, I'm gonna do a lot of dressing and undressing with a couple of my mules once this patch goes live.
You dont have to dress and undress. If you wanted, you could just deconstruct that gear, since deconstructing a piece of gear that isnt in your sticker book adds it.Also, my understanding is that dungeon sets I've stored are already bound?
Correct. After the update you'll need to log on to each toon in order for the sticker book to register what's in their inventory, but after you've done that anything you own that says "bound" is in your collections and able to be reconstructed.
Really, because I had considered having to put on and take off sets while at the de-conn table being a major inconvenience. GREAT to hear that won't be an issue!! Cheers for that info.
Just remember, if it's bind on equip (so, mostly overland sets), you will need to make sure they're bound to you before you crunch them. (For example, Mother's Sorrow needs to be equipped BEFORE decon. While BSW would not need to be.)
There are conflicting reports on this, then. Some people are saying you can just decon without equipping (for any piece of gear), or sell to a vendor enough to push the item off the buy-back list. In other words, whatever means you can’t trade it to someone else in game.
Taleof2Cities wrote: »To repeat my suggestion: increase base mount speed by 30% remove major gallop and rapids and optionally replace it with some new skill relevant to pvp. Players would be happy and server hamsters would have one less buff to track.
People will always want to move faster then the base speed no matter what it is set at.
Clarification for this discussion: People will always want to move as fast as they have for years, not slower.
While it's still true that people will rail against making anything harder to obtain, the true disservice is having something taken away that was an integral part of your gaming experience. The uproar would have been far less dramatic if they had simply grandfathered in those who already had Rapids unlocked, and only required AR5 for characters who had not yet earned it. And yet, there it sits.... fully barred Rapid Maneuver IV forever mocking you on your skills page. And with a locked icon to remind you of what you once had, but are now required to grind unnecessary gameplay that you may or may not even be interested in to get back.
I'm starting to worry about the time forum-goers are spending crafting posts on this topic in the forums ... when that time could be used to level up multiple characters to Assault 5.
wishlist14 wrote: »Zos team please adress this issue. I am a woman who loves playing eso and have been subbed for 5 plus years now and today zone chat crossed a line for me.
In a generation that is so dead set on treating people equally THIS abuse is unacceptable. I reported these players.
I had to be subjected to a tirade of disging, hurtful and derrogative comments about my gender. I cant imagine what negative effects it could have on younger girls.
The comments were extremely graphic about womens private parts.
Yes i can turn of zone chat but why cant i enjoy the nicer side of my eso community? These players are on ignore after being reported but they will do it again if jot stop. That level of hatred towards females feels like violence and it seriously brought me to tears.
This is unfair and unacceptable. I always treat everyone with respect. I did jot say anything to them i just reported them.
Ty for reading. 😢❤
Also i need to say there are a lot nicer people in our eso community all genders afcourse....i want to protect our amazing eso community by reporting these disgusting few that think its ok to behave like that on zone chat
This occured in rivenspire zone chat 10 mins ago
SilverBride wrote: »I'm confused. You said that "If it's about what the customers are happy with", which means you believe this decision could have been made for reasons that weren't to do with player's happiness.
You then said "then you need to consider all the customers." Which, given that this change penalises some players when there were options that penalised none, must mean that ZOS didn't take into account all their players. (You even bolded the "all" bit to show how essential it is.)
Sorry for the confusion. I was replying to this poster's reply to Gina's previous post where she stated they are happy with how this change is working:It's not about what you're happy with, it's about what your customers are happy with.
And I replied what I did, meaning if they base their decisions on what the customers are happy with, (which I never said I agree with, because I think making some players happy needs to be balanced with doing what is best for all), that they would then need to consider all the customers, not just the ones who may not like the change. I never considered that anyone was being penalized.
But I also said I found a compromise that was presented to be reasonable. It would make more people happy and I could back that.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Can the OP explain why things worked so much better from 2014 to 2018 with cross healing and population caps at least double what they are now?
I'm pretty sure they just need to put the game back onto servers that can support it.
maybe it was BSDM armor?
Queue for a random group and you will get a random group. No reason to be surprised.