BardokRedSnow wrote: »I saw the first sentence and voted pure immediately, keep your irl politics and tendencies irl. It is just a videogame.
Mono means one (from Greek monos).
Monoclassing, it is referring to using one Class so that is better to me.
i have also used "base classing" as ZOS the game refers to our Class as our base Class.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mono
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/base
(edited to add: no idea where i read or heard base class, in-game and eso website posts say "primary class")
Pure sounds like an awful choice for refering to using only one Class.
a lot of its definitions and synonyms are not very accurate for this usage
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pure
1. Free of flaws or imperfections; unsullied.
Synonyms: pristine, untouched, virgin.
Antonyms: dirty, flawed, impure.
2. Free of foreign material or pollutants.
Synonyms: crude, natural, unrefined.
Antonyms: contaminated, impure.
3. Free of immoral behavior or qualities; clean.
Synonyms: innocent, chaste.
Antonyms: corrupt, guilty, sinful.
tomofhyrule wrote: »Some people read way too much into things.
"Pure" as a word just means "free of other elements." That is literally what we mean. I play a Class that is not using lines from other Classes, done. There is no "I'm better than you" in there.
The word "Pure" is also used in many other contexts, like in science. If we have "Pure gold," we know that it is 100% gold with no alloys. If I am making a compound in a lab and I purify it, there are no other compounds in there. That is the word for it.
It is people ascribing the meaning of "better" to the word "Pure" (which is not it's actual meaning!) who are then getting mad that other people are using a word which they've ascribed a different meaning to.
"Garbage man" or "sanitation engineer" (or when Jonathan Winters used to shill for Hefty, "we men in gar-bahj"). The community mostly settled on "pure-classed" as the antonym of "subclassed" about a year ago. Language is malleable so you could possibly generate broad enough support to change that usage, but it works well enough in describing the thing it's attached to.
Pure sounds better as a word. Mono makes me think of the disease.
Well, it is not a poll that should decide that.
Even ZOS hasn't decided this.
The term "pure class" came about by itself from the community on the subclassing discussion threads.
But in view of this self-nomination even ZOS ended up using it in its patch notes etc.
tomofhyrule wrote: »Some people read way too much into things.
"Pure" as a word just means "free of other elements." That is literally what we mean. I play a Class that is not using lines from other Classes, done. There is no "I'm better than you" in there.
The word "Pure" is also used in many other contexts, like in science. If we have "Pure gold," we know that it is 100% gold with no alloys. If I am making a compound in a lab and I purify it, there are no other compounds in there. That is the word for it.
It is people ascribing the meaning of "better" to the word "Pure" (which is not it's actual meaning!) who are then getting mad that other people are using a word which they've ascribed a different meaning to.
Read LunaFlora’s post with the actual definitions for the prefixes. Pure- has other connotations other than “free from other things.” If something has been made pure it is implied it is better than the original thing. It is free from impurities. If we want to talk about science that is what it means to purify something in chemistry. It implies that sub-class lines are impurities.
SwordOfSagas wrote: »Lol this is cazy tbh, sounds a bit like cancel culture to me. And by the way whats wrong with being ''pure blood''?
SwordOfSagas wrote: »Lol this is cazy tbh, sounds a bit like cancel culture to me. And by the way whats wrong with being ''pure blood''?
Apart from the fact they are vilified in the context of Harry Potter? I mean nothing inherent but that does depend on context. That was the pop culture reference I was making.
SwordOfSagas wrote: »Lol this is cazy tbh, sounds a bit like cancel culture to me. And by the way whats wrong with being ''pure blood''?
Apart from the fact they are vilified in the context of Harry Potter? I mean nothing inherent but that does depend on context. That was the pop culture reference I was making.
It is hard not to notice that some of the people voting "pure is bad" have come out on the forum strongly against running pure- or mono-class builds and some have even been seen raging about the prospect of Class Mastery.DenverRalphy wrote: »Interesting that nobody seemed to really care about any perceived implication when pure classes were the underperforming option.