El_Borracho wrote: »Most glyphs now are hybrid, i.e. weapon or spell damage. However, if you put an absorb magicka glyph on a melee weapon, I don't know if that would work. I've never tried it, but it seems antithetical to the point of the glyph
El_Borracho wrote: »Most glyphs now are hybrid, i.e. weapon or spell damage. However, if you put an absorb magicka glyph on a melee weapon, I don't know if that would work. I've never tried it, but it seems antithetical to the point of the glyph
El_Borracho wrote: »Most glyphs now are hybrid, i.e. weapon or spell damage. However, if you put an absorb magicka glyph on a melee weapon, I don't know if that would work. I've never tried it, but it seems antithetical to the point of the glyph
There are two aspects to that sort of effect - the removal of resource from the enemy, and the addition of resource to the player. Which of the two is most beneficial depends on the specific pairing. Draining the mage of magicka may help more than doing the same to an archer in reducing their offense. Draining the same mage of stamina would benefit a stamina-based swordsman, and the archer might provide more, for sustaining the player’s.