Winning in a social game has a different meaning as I explained to other posters above.
Just want to point out, that it is impossible to win in a social game. If it is social, it is social... if you can win, by definition it is a competition. If it is a competition, there is scoring and a clear means in which someone can achieve a "win", generally a leaderboard of some type in most games. The leaderboards in ESO cover Alliance War, Trials, Arenas and Battlegrounds... that's it, there are no other ways to win. These are also very clear, you achieved a score of X by completing activity Y, putting you above other players rankings. If the game doesn't rank it, you can't win it... by purchasing items or otherwise, sorry.
There are plenty of ways to "win" in a social game. Being social and being competitive are not mutually exclusive.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/591253/100-000-000-gold-housing-competition-pc-na-pc-eu#latest
Your link is to a player generated event, which is not a core feature of the game, so nothing that happened in that event could be considered PTW. If the players hosting and judging that event, decided that the winners had to have crown homes and crown furniture to win, well that is on them... but has zero to do with the game itself and how it functions. See my post directly above yours for clarification. ZOS has control of their game, they don't have control over every random idea someone comes up with to have fun in the game... including player made competitions. At best, you could blame the guy hosting the event for making a PTW event, but that is not on ZOS and doesn't make ESO a PTW game.
Ok...but earlier you suggested....well let me just quote youas for the safe exchange of crowns, there are numerous places that will literally guarantee the transaction, my guild hosts its own and we too guarantee the transaction between our members. I am not here to argue about crown exchanges or their rates though. I am simply stating there are secure methods for which to exchange gold for crowns, and it is a supported feature of the game, regardless of whether ZOS hosts a direct exchange themselves or not.
So you believe that the game can not be "pay to win" because of crown gifting where a 3rd party source that takes place outside of the game makes the crown/gold exhange? But a 3rd party contest being held for the game by ZOS approved sponsors "Official Partners" does not count towards the argument?
Do you not think that this line of thought is not a bit hypocritical? I am asking this as an honest question.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »I don’t think that’s an unpopular opinion at all, I think all rational people understand this isn’t pay to win. There is not a single thing in the crown store that gives a gameplay advantage that isn’t also available in-game.
The ayelid well. People using it to always start Battlegrounds with ult and able to requeue immediately. Someone else has to go farm it which can significantly increase wait times or more commonly just start the match at a disadvantage. I only recently learned it was being used that way by someone asking for everyone to start in the same ult state.
I don't know the item or BGs, but what you describe sounds like Pay for Convenience, as the item is available in the game and if it's that essential for BGs then there's no reason why players can't farm it beforehand.
The ayelid well is only available in the cash shop, and replenishes all your resources after an extremely short channel, including your ultimate. It's vastly superior to trying to build up before requeuing the normal way, as instantly requeuing makes it more likely you'll get into another BGs quickly. This is why a lot of people simply opt to build what they can while waiting for queue to pop then going in as is instead of farming ult and then queuing.
The antiquity you're thinking of only produces a blue light, it doesn't give you anything for combat.
The well you speak of is still not P2W as it does not make a player character more powerful than it can be from what is obtainable in-game. It is merely paid for convenience. I am not suggesting you are saying otherwise. Just commenting on the item's use.
In general I agree with you. For Battlegrounds, I think it's probably a little p2w. If you start with ult and your enemy doesn't, that's a pretty big advantage.
I think they could probably fix the only small aspects that are p2w by making the skills only able to be purchased at 50+ and making everyone start in the same ultimate state in BGs, personally.
A player who charges their ult by attacking NPCs has the same as one who charged their ult via the well. So there is no P2W by definition.
That is what you spoke of in what I quoted. Not sure where you are trying to go but it is not relevant to what I quoted or my reply.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Pixiepumpkin wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Pixiepumpkin wrote: »lots of people are not understanding that pay to win means pay money for advantage, but that advantage can also give the player better chances at the best loot. so paying to win also means pay to loot. combat is not a requirment for pay to win
in mmorpgs peple win when they get the best loot and in this game the best loot comes from the crown store and that costs real money, lots of it
Cash shop items are not loot. You don't do any gameplay to earn them. Loot is rewards for playing.
but you cant get most crown store or gamble crate items in game, only in store. so if you want a nice house it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice mount, it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice outfit, it cost a lot of real money
people been playing mmorpgs for a long time and those old games set standards for what it means to play an mmorpg. i did not know whne I started eso that all the cool stuff was locked behind real money.
they show cool things on the videos for the game like the new video they made but most of the cool stuff is not really avaialbe in game, it has to be through cash store. that seems to me like false advertising because it does not say anywhere that all the cool things you see in videos or even in game mostly come through cash shop or gamble crates.
its pay to win to me. if you want to win by having cool stuff to show off you have to pay for it, you cant get it in game
I think you are using the terms Showing off and Winning to mean the same thing, but they aren't. You don't win by showing off, you are simply showing off and haven't won anything.
Winning, to me, is defined by what the game itself wants you to do with an item to compete with another player. Whether it's socially, economically, or through direct gameplay. If the game itself puts you in competition with another player rather than your fantasy, it would be winning.
So achievements and guild trader bids would also count, but having a prettier outfit wouldn't as the cash shop and outfit systems aren't meant to be a trophy like the stuff you get from achievements.
See, that's were we kinda disagree. I don't feel, nor have I ever, that I am in a competition with other players, or the game itself for that matter, to earn achievements, titles or any of those sorts of things, they are nothing more than visual fluff. I feel the game has simply put them there to create goals for me, so I have something to work towards. Otherwise, it would simply be a sandbox game, of which I would tire of in short order and find another game to play. You or that other guy getting an achievement, that literally (tens) of thousands have already achieved, really isn't anything special, its just something to do to keep me busy, playing, and hopefully (from a ZOS point of view) spending my money in the crown store.
spartaxoxo wrote: »So I think that your right that this is where our viewpoints differ.
They are completely related. Both examples use 3rd party sources outside of the game. One group is part of the official ZOS partner program (the people putting on housing contest) and the other is not.
No, I don't think it is hypocritical nor are the two even remotely related to each other. The fact is, you can buy (almost) any item in the crown store for gold via a safe secure method.
The other is simply player created content, not run by ZOS and not rated/tracked in the game. It is run by just another player, who happens to show their face on screen over on Youtube or Twitch. During the last event, ZOS had links on their page to "Streamers" who are partners or whatever, more than half of which had less than 100 followers, the one I watched to get my free crate had 16 followers (and it was obvious why in short order).
Those Streamers, while awesome for the community spreading game knowledge and giving ZOS free marketing, are doing this as a job, it is how the good ones make their living, their "events", giveaways and contests are aimed at getting them more subs and viewers, even if the stuff they do is fun and community building. Also, none of those player events include more than the tiniest fraction of the overall playerbase, while leaderboards on the other hand are there to see, in game, by everyone, and everyone who plays has an equal chance to get on them, if they so choose (skill withstanding).
Had you not linked that advert earlier, I would have never heard of it, when I looked at it, it had 5 replies and 370 views, not exactly an overwhelming response or reach. I also did not see a popup for it when I logged in, telling me I should go visit that groups Discord to participate in a "officially sanctioned" housing event, and I doubt I ever will.
I do however, know numerous players that risked buying crowns in zone chat and got burned, and while it took a while for ZOS to resolve their report, they were made whole in the end. YMMV on that though.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Pixiepumpkin wrote: »but you cant get most crown store or gamble crate items in game, only in store.
Yes. Because they're not loot. Loot is the stuff your earn from gameplay.Pixiepumpkin wrote: »so if you want a nice house it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice mount, it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice outfit, it cost a lot of real money
Untrue. There are many nice houses available with coin and also additional houses given out for gameplay. There are nice mounts that earnable. They have an extensive and nice outfits system that you primarily earn from gameplay too.
Alemtuzumab wrote: »I don't understand how the game should prosper if the economy is prosperous. Using hyperbole in a discussion is not helpful at all. If the arguments are too massive then try to sum it up.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Pixiepumpkin wrote: »but you cant get most crown store or gamble crate items in game, only in store.
Yes. Because they're not loot. Loot is the stuff your earn from gameplay.Pixiepumpkin wrote: »so if you want a nice house it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice mount, it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice outfit, it cost a lot of real money
Untrue. There are many nice houses available with coin and also additional houses given out for gameplay. There are nice mounts that earnable. They have an extensive and nice outfits system that you primarily earn from gameplay too.
Actually they are 100% correct. You can not obtain the best houses, mounts, or costumes in game. Those are only obtained through the Crown Store or Crown Crates.
My question is how come the people who like to decorate, collect mounts for their alts, create multiple lore like characters and theme them are the players who have the burden of monetization for the game.
ESO is pretty pay to win, without paying you only have access for like 3 separate weeks a year, don't think that is enough to develop competitive character.
ShawnLaRock wrote: »?
I haven’t heard anyone say otherwise. Curious as to why this is relevant…
S.
It is pay2win.
Warden
Necro
Jewelry crafting
Vateshran
Mythics
I'm sure there are more
spartaxoxo wrote: »Pixiepumpkin wrote: »so if you want a nice house it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice mount, it cost a lot of real money, if you want a nice outfit, it cost a lot of real money
Untrue. There are many nice houses available with coin and also additional houses given out for gameplay. There are nice mounts that earnable. They have an extensive and nice outfits system that you primarily earn from gameplay too.
Actually they are 100% correct. You can not obtain the best houses, mounts, or costumes in game. Those are only obtained through the Crown Store or Crown Crates.
My question is how come the people who like to decorate, collect mounts for their alts, create multiple lore like characters and theme them are the players who have the burden of monetization for the game.
Sevalaricgirl wrote: »ESO is pretty pay to win, without paying you only have access for like 3 separate weeks a year, don't think that is enough to develop competitive character.
Say what? ESO is buy to play. Once you buy in, you can play as much as you like for nothing, unlimited, not 3 weeks a year. I don't know where you got that. ESO is like any other game you play, you have to buy it first.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »Realistically, if you're an active player, you'll want to have a subscription and also buy the annual content.
If that's pay-to-win, then any subscription-only game would be pay-to-win as well.
So I think OP is right to focus on the question as to whether ADDITIONAL payments beyonnd that, i.e. for Crown Store stuff, ae necessary for character optimization.
It is pay2win.
Warden
Necro
Jewelry crafting
Vateshran
Mythics
I'm sure there are more
My question is how come the people who like to decorate, collect mounts for their alts, create multiple lore like characters and theme them are the players who have the burden of monetization for the game.
Sevalaricgirl wrote: »It is pay2win.
Warden
Necro
Jewelry crafting
Vateshran
Mythics
I'm sure there are more
Yeah no. Classes came with the expansions, you don't have to use them to play the game. The definition of pay 2 win...
"in online gaming, the practice of buying in-game items that give a player a very big advantage over others"
Necro, warden, jewelry crafting etc has 0 to do with a big advantage over others. I will say this. If you think others have an advantage over you, you need to "get gud".
jedtb16_ESO wrote: »
as far as i know, and i could be wrong, there is no splash screen that says >>>>>>> GAME OVER. CONGRATULATIONS, YOU WON.
i could be wrong though.
Alemtuzumab wrote: »Pay-to-win criteria:
1. Cash shop contains weapon/armor that is unobtainable in the game. (✘)