Pretty much thisElaboration on "skimpy" should be made. My vote for Yes is for classy, slightly revealing clothing, not sex-appeal armor. Also, armor itself I think is fine as is -- In my post, I'll be discussing clothing specifically. Leather and cloth "armor" is a different discussion than metal armor.
I'm a female gamer. I enjoy playing characters that are obviously female, and (in a classy way) showing feminine assets off.
There are limits though. Pointless armor that serves no purpose beyond sex appeal doesn't interest me. By the same token, "granny armor" and "granny clothes" don't interest me either. A balance is ideal.
I wouldn't say ESO is heavy on "granny clothes", but it is quite conservative. A little more spice couldn't hurt. Things need not be Black/White or 1/0, there's a happy-medium to be found. I would say compromise, but that denotes two sides taking a loss which is inaccurate. "Tera" would be on the extreme side of the scale, with ridiculously over-sexualized characters -- I doubt most people here want that, extremes are called such for a reason.
On a sidenote, a friend and I had an interesting discussion awhile back. They were perusing various threads on this subject on the net, and came to an entertaining observation. They claimed that the majority of people who were vehemently against showing of skin in games almost universally had masculine names, and were most likely males, whereas those in support of such outfits were quite often likely women, given their feminine names and the way they wrote. These are generalizations of course, but generalizations are called such because they're generally true.
The "trope" is that the only people who like reasonably revealing armor in games is fat men living in their basement, but our observation was that the reverse is true -- that many women want to have the freedom to play female characters that aren't afraid to show a little skin, while men are quite often quick to play the "White Knight" role and try to protect the virtue of the female gender in games.
I'm a very conservative person in reality. I'm too shy to go around wearing skirts and high heels. I'm happy with my body, but basically I'm a computer geek! So I like to do this in fantasy games instead -- just like a lot of guys like to run around in bulky armor with oversized weapons in games. It's all about having fun.
patrick.loiselleb16_ESO wrote: »When I open my eyes lately, I see women covering up more. There's a difference between showing a bit of skin and being almost naked. Also, giving women options isn't sexist and trust me, most women here don't want the option to have skimpy clothing. Why? It will mostly be males playing them and making sexual comments like it's been in EVERY other MMO that has skimpy clothing. There may be the few female exception but as a whole, women tend to hate it. They feel sexualized and used. Why don't you start a thread for skimpy outfits just for men? See how that goes? You'll likely get a lot of gay support, the few women and those that are shocked! A man doesn't dress skimpy! He's a man...Roar roar....sexism sexism....
There needs to be more options in the clothing at some point...once the bugs are fixed. I don't disagree with that. However, there is a huge difference between options and almost naked so there may as well not be an option. Run around in your undies I guess. The game allows for that.
Do you currently know any army where the women have skampy outfits. Here boys...some camo! Ladies, here's your skirt and we'd like you in heels. Better practice that running because the ennemy isn't messing around!
NakedSnake wrote: »Pretty much thisElaboration on "skimpy" should be made. My vote for Yes is for classy, slightly revealing clothing, not sex-appeal armor. Also, armor itself I think is fine as is -- In my post, I'll be discussing clothing specifically. Leather and cloth "armor" is a different discussion than metal armor.
I'm a female gamer. I enjoy playing characters that are obviously female, and (in a classy way) showing feminine assets off.
There are limits though. Pointless armor that serves no purpose beyond sex appeal doesn't interest me. By the same token, "granny armor" and "granny clothes" don't interest me either. A balance is ideal.
I wouldn't say ESO is heavy on "granny clothes", but it is quite conservative. A little more spice couldn't hurt. Things need not be Black/White or 1/0, there's a happy-medium to be found. I would say compromise, but that denotes two sides taking a loss which is inaccurate. "Tera" would be on the extreme side of the scale, with ridiculously over-sexualized characters -- I doubt most people here want that, extremes are called such for a reason.
On a sidenote, a friend and I had an interesting discussion awhile back. They were perusing various threads on this subject on the net, and came to an entertaining observation. They claimed that the majority of people who were vehemently against showing of skin in games almost universally had masculine names, and were most likely males, whereas those in support of such outfits were quite often likely women, given their feminine names and the way they wrote. These are generalizations of course, but generalizations are called such because they're generally true.
The "trope" is that the only people who like reasonably revealing armor in games is fat men living in their basement, but our observation was that the reverse is true -- that many women want to have the freedom to play female characters that aren't afraid to show a little skin, while men are quite often quick to play the "White Knight" role and try to protect the virtue of the female gender in games.
I'm a very conservative person in reality. I'm too shy to go around wearing skirts and high heels. I'm happy with my body, but basically I'm a computer geek! So I like to do this in fantasy games instead -- just like a lot of guys like to run around in bulky armor with oversized weapons in games. It's all about having fun.patrick.loiselleb16_ESO wrote: »When I open my eyes lately, I see women covering up more. There's a difference between showing a bit of skin and being almost naked. Also, giving women options isn't sexist and trust me, most women here don't want the option to have skimpy clothing. Why? It will mostly be males playing them and making sexual comments like it's been in EVERY other MMO that has skimpy clothing. There may be the few female exception but as a whole, women tend to hate it. They feel sexualized and used. Why don't you start a thread for skimpy outfits just for men? See how that goes? You'll likely get a lot of gay support, the few women and those that are shocked! A man doesn't dress skimpy! He's a man...Roar roar....sexism sexism....
There needs to be more options in the clothing at some point...once the bugs are fixed. I don't disagree with that. However, there is a huge difference between options and almost naked so there may as well not be an option. Run around in your undies I guess. The game allows for that.
Do you currently know any army where the women have skampy outfits. Here boys...some camo! Ladies, here's your skirt and we'd like you in heels. Better practice that running because the ennemy isn't messing around!
I suggest you read Sarenia's post above and stop assuming you know anything about "how women feel" or "what they want" in general just because you claim to be a feminist. Trusting you is the last thing anyone should do since it is obvious your opinion is biased. You fail to realize that this thread is about skimpy clothes for both women and men. Furthermore your lack of insight prevents you and those like you from realizing that perhaps real life females playing this game would like some skimpy clothes for their male characters.
NakedSnake wrote: »Have a lot of deep philosophical conversations about feminism in MMO chat rooms with real life gurlz have you? Riiiigggghhhhtttt.....
No wonder you have no comprehension of the real world.
patrick.loiselleb16_ESO wrote: »NakedSnake wrote: »Have a lot of deep philosophical conversations about feminism in MMO chat rooms with real life gurlz have you? Riiiigggghhhhtttt.....
No wonder you have no comprehension of the real world.
Guess you're out of arguments...Turning passive aggressive and insulting won't get you far with me. As for the real world, I know about it from experiencing it. I'm a therapist and I have a bachelor's in women's studies as well.
Either way, I'm done. I don't do pissing contests online. I do hope that Zeni will do the right thing on this subject and create a wider variety or armor for male and female toons without feeling the need to go too provocative. Sexy doesn't mean slutty.
patrick.loiselleb16_ESO wrote: »Let's see how many female toons dressed in that manner we get if ONLY WOMEN can play women toons. You will see almost none. Add men to the equation and you will get a TON. I think we both know that's 100% true.
patrick.loiselleb16_ESO wrote: »Let's see how many female toons dressed in that manner we get if ONLY WOMEN can play women toons. You will see almost none. Add men to the equation and you will get a TON. I think we both know that's 100% true.
Right... because women never dress sexy given the choice.
Also, if female toons could only be played by women, I'm betting a lot of women would probably play as male characters because playing as a female would attract a lot of unwanted attention.
NakedSnake wrote: »I miss it but GOT keeps me satisfied.
Also, if female toons could only be played by women, I'm betting a lot of women would probably play as male characters because playing as a female would attract a lot of unwanted attention.