Beste Inhalte
Aw: where can i buy a soul shriven crafting motif book?
kringled_1 schrieb: »You can't buy it. You have to complete Cadwell's Silver to get it and at that point its account bound.
This.
I think it appears in your mail or inventory once you finish Cadwell's Silver.
Aw: Your Witches Festival Characters
Here ya go
Me and my buddy lookin for butterflies
Me and my buddy lookin for butterflies
Alchemy ingredients as furnishings?
We have had quite a lot of cooking stuff as furnishings, but not alchemy ingredients.
Why not, on that magical day when you gift us our long-requested home gardening update for housing, with plots and planters and harvesting, perhaps also let us occasionally harvest an alchemical furnishing item? For example, harvesting a water hyacinth out in the world (or in our homes) would grant us a rare chance at also harvesting a water hyacinth furnishing item.
I like the idea of strewing herbs and ingredients on counters and in barrels inside our homes. I miss being able to do this ESO, like I was able to in Skyrim.
Aw: How is DPS this low on CP 500+ toons?
ForeverJenn schrieb: »Possible. Out of three times this happened, I LEGITIMATELY asked, "why is the dps so low?" Only one ever responded, "OpPoSeD tO tHroWinG a TaNtRuM?!" Like, they got offended over a question. Which leads me to believe I'm not the first person to say something....
Altho....it happened again last night in WGT. They were doing about 6k dps, but luckily the dps were receptive to instructions and over doubled and we were able to get through eventually. The healer was clueless and heavy attacked the with their resto staff, never went to a back bar, never used a buff or any assist. Heavy resto and the occasional small heal. They were even attacking the invincible phase at last boss. They only said "Not English sry" lol
Possible conversations:
group/tank: why is dps so low?
group/dd#1: <remains silent>
group/dd#2: <remains silent>
group/heal: no english, sry
whisper dd#1: nice touch heal
whisper dd#2: maybe we should kick the tank; wasn't expecting a real one, maybe we can get a proper kiting 40k+ dps turkey-puncher?
whisper heal: nah, tank is doing 40% dps, we might end up with another wet noodle like us. anyway the salt could get entertaining
whisper together: lol
Joking aside, as others have mentioned there's a whole bunch of possibilities:
- super-fast levelling doesn't give enough time to properly learn class, skills, attributes, cp etc in the absence of guild/experience player mentorship
- overland content doesn't give enough diverse experience to learn above
- wearing mismatched gear (but a GREAT outfit)
- the game itself doesn't give much feedback about damage, buffs,debuffs, heals, you need add-ons/3rd party website access. players may think they're contributing (using diverse skills, pseudo-rotation, occasional LA weaves etc) but have no real data with which to make any kind of objective assessment in the absence of add-ons.
- players like to have fun - for some that may be whacking away endlessly in a dungeon doing 2k dps. The damage is less important than feeling a sense of fun. And thingies die - eventually. Because you're awesome with your fire staff/2H, equal attribute point split combinations. Obviously.
etc.
edit:formatting
Aw: Cross healing maybe be one of several contributoring factors to lag in Cyrodiil.
relentless_turnip schrieb: »relentless_turnip schrieb: »Joy_Division schrieb: »relentless_turnip schrieb: »i canot, under any circumstance, forward this opinion...
It renders Healers and support Roles utterly useless in Cyrodil. i repeat myself here, but it seems not everyone of the DD players (no offense) understands, how tremendous this impacts the rest of the viable options in PVP...
With less cross healing it also makes your role more important and sought after to anyone who knows what they're doing. I do appreciate it makes joining in less of a casual undertaking than someone just doing damage.
I would predict that if this was a permanent change then we would see group building become more important over time. It is just a numbers game at the moment and totally indescriminate. What I'm saying is the net effect will most likely be that support roles become more important, not less.
No group relies on ungrouped PuG healers so there isn't going to be a greater demand for their role. If I'm running solo, I'm running solo and it's not like I'm gonna all of a sudden put LF healer in zone chat to play.
All this change will do is force people who don't necessarily want to group or just want to hop in for an hour or so to group up just to play, which is not only dumb and constraining, but goes completely against the supposed mantra of "play as you want." If ZOS made it so DPS could not damage enemy players unless they were grouped, 95% of the people who support this change would immediately say no way.
The change would also undeniably strengthen the organized groups that people claim to hate and claim to want to see nerfed. If the PuGs can;t heal each other, they stand zero chance unless stacking in ridiculous numbers.
And even if you want to force PuGs to just randomly group up simply to get heals, it will still create idiotic situations where if one group is getting destroyed on a keep flag, their teammates from a different group still can;t support them. It's no longer AvAvA, it's just a glorified battleground with allies who are just in the wayAlso in any battle scenario would a medic heal 100 people or is it more likely they were responsible for a smaller group? Say 12?
If people couldn't do damage outside of a group then yes everyone would be upset. That is because the over arching point of any PvP scenario is to kill your enemy. Support roles are exactly that... Support. If you have a healer and your enemy doesn't you are at major advantage. Arguing they are the same is redundant in my opinion...
You act like there is nothing in between solo and group. Even in a duo you can take a much larger group. In a group of 24 you don't need healers as much because off all the cross healing, when you lose half of that it is noticible and roles become more important. Would you need healers in a trial if you could take 24 people and everyone was casting aoe heals?
This is a great question. Besides the fact that one player cannot actually have heals going on 100 characters at the same time, but a wise and well-trained medic with 100 soldiers in their sight will not restrict themselves, nor be restricted. to the small group they are attached to. They will heal any and all allies based on the training they have received.
@relentless_turnip I might have missed it but I answered your question yet have not seen you address it since it does throw a stone into your argument.
No worries @idk I wasn't ignoring it 😂 the issue you raise is also my counter point to someone else's point. You are not a medic choosing to help any of the 100 men in your area, you are medic continuously throwing bandages in the air in hope they land on the right person. I cannot heal the person in front of me, despite my efforts and everytime the heal misses but gives
This is merely due to the design of combat in this game. Further, you can heal the person in front of you by using a heal that only casts in front of you. We have heals that only go out in one direction in the shape of a cone and they work well. It is also a really bad idea to make it so one cannot heal an ally which seems to be what you are suggesting.
In fact, any suggestion of only being able to heal those in our group would make some heals completely useless at times. Further, I can imagine a healer riding back to the battle to join their group and comes across another big battle and is virtually useless because someone decided they should not be able to heal people on their team. Brilliant.
We might as well abandon alliances and make PvP a free for all if they are to start leaning towards being meaningless which would be the case if we cannot heal our allies. I care about the team.
Aw: Zos, ask yourself these questions.
Disappointed. 
Was expecting a Monty Python moment. The questions should have been:
Come on, anyone at zos - what're your answers to those, huh? HUH??
Was expecting a Monty Python moment. The questions should have been:
- what is your name?
- what is your favourite colour?
- what is the average wing velocity of a swallow?
Come on, anyone at zos - what're your answers to those, huh? HUH??
Aw: Dark Passions Regalia Flap
Contaminate schrieb: »The whole premise of the costume is creepy at best. I know marketing teams think everyone playing their game is a hormonal 12 year old who’s never seen a woman before but please chill out
That's rather toxic and quite sad of a view to have. The entirety and sum total of all gamers with female characters ( be they dudes, cis fem, trans, non, or anywhere on the gender spectrum) have nothing invested in taunting males or trolling 12yos lol. Gross.
People (google: "humans") like to look good, or fun, or cute sometimes. This outfit is a design fail with this GIANT pro-masculine ween flap that looks glued on as an afterthought by the PR department. Yeah, I bought it like we all did...and yeah, it'll never get worn.
The bottom line is, in a rated M game populated as afar as I know only by adults (some quite old, in fact), we can handle some cute shorts without the need for PR flaps added.
Aw: Proc burst damage is out of control
MurderMostFoul schrieb: »Recapitated schrieb: »Atherakhia schrieb: »The majority of the pvp playerbase spoke up last time there was a proccmeta, zos listened then, so I dont for the life of me understand how they could circle right back to square one again..only worse then last time. The proccmeta is boring, toxic and devoid of any feeling of accomplishment.
to me, this proves that they just do it on random. i cant really say they listen to cries for nerfing or buffing stuff. like there is a dart in the office and do whatever it lands on it.
i would be okay with these sets, they could be fun if they didnt nerf all the stuff back then for balance and whatnot.
I'm pretty sure they do it so you have to buy the new chapter. Most people right now are running greymoor sets, which means they have to either buy the BoE sets or buy the dlc for the BoP sets. Summerset had sload's, Elsweyr had NMA and now we have all these proc sets. The question is whether at this point they think they got enough people to buy the new content and can nerf the new sets. The markarth sets probably won't be nerfed until enough people buy it via crown store (those without eso+).
This is often said about ESO and its expansions, that the reason things are so poorly tuned and overpowered at release and nerfed shortly thereafter is specifically to sell expansions. While it may look like that, I question if any player legitimately does that. And would said player be stupid enough to fall for the same buff/nerf from one expansion to the next?
And if so, why is it always the stamina sets and never a worthwhile mag set in these releases?
Elsweyr didn't have a p2w set that I can think (everyone had access to NMA) but it did have a deliberately overtuned class.
I don't agree, NMA was the most obvious scenario ever, literally hundreds of builds were changed to use NMA, you could only get it by buying expansion, then they nerf a year later, for new expansion. I actually like the changes to many of the sets that they made and love the diversity even of proc sets. Even don't care about nerf to NMA. But come on, the only other set that is this obviously p2w is Thrassian. BTW overall these p2w scenarios are NOT that bad, not game breaking, and if it keeps them funded it is smart.
NMA was easily accessible without buying Elsweyr.
I didn't say anything about buying Elsweyr? I believe you have to buy Dragonhold DLC to get Southern Elsweyr, to get the NMA crafting station. Obviously you can buy from guild trader or have someone craft a set for you. But I think most people who buy the DLC are when it first comes out before guild traders have lots of pieces available. I did exactly that.
You can just travel to the house of someone who has the crafting station which most people have right on release day.
Also NMA was in no way comparable to the current procs.
I added a mere 480 weapon/spell damage on the 5pc which was good but other sets could offer just as much, additionally it had a distinct drawback with the 5% cost increase.
480 weapon damage doesn't provide anywhere near as much damage as a single proc does especially not in the same gcd.
In order to get 5-7k additional AoE damage you'd had to use an AoE ability which for most people doesn't even hit that hard to begin with.
Even when taking shalks or blastbones as an comparison the amount of damage you would had to stack to gain an additional 5k damage is absurd and can't be achieved by a single 5pc set let alone a 2pc set.
This is where procs enter the equation, first of all getting that extra burst comes at no direct disadvantage, your damage doesn't even decrease significantly and you could also play 2 defensive sets along with it because procs don't scale with stats but only benefit from damage done/taken increase or penetration and especially malacath.
1 year ago every ult that was once instant got hit by the worst change in the entirety of the game, Cast times.
Why?
Because the devs said they provided too much instant damage which is laughable they're ultimates after all and now they're unreliable, clunky to use and quite frankly have nothing "ulitmateish" about them anymore.
But then Zos decides to add Procs that are once again instant and deal comparable damage to some ultimates but have no cost, a much lower downtime and you don't even have to build for stats to deal damage with them.
Aw: Now that Litter Box Simulator event is over
Just take a quick glance at the excavation mini game and you'll understand what the "litterbox simulator" is. 
Aw: My opinion on the OLORIME and SPELL POWER CURE changes. (critique and suggestions)
In first week's patch notes SPC got masively buffed and Olorime got nerfed. Do you know which set was better inthat patch? OLORIME. It have a 100% up time with a DD that have a brain. SPC can not have 100% up time ever. Only thing SPC bringed to table was ability to buff sperated groups. Thats it.
Now they made spc useless. Duration is so low, it will have a high downtime and you still want it to be even more weaker?
Max mag and spell power are healing stats, dont portray them as offensive on a healer. But sustain is better on healer. Breton was the favorite healer class for long time because of better sustain. I would preffer Olorime's 2-3-4 piece bonus over SPC's.
Channeled Focus
Magicka Recovery Glyph
Heavy Attacks
Clockwork Citrus Filet (or Witchmothers)
This is from alcast's templar healer guide. Can you see it? The heavy atack. Why would you waste time with heavy atack while you can cast more skills? Because you run out of magicka. So what do you need even while using Olorime? More magicka. Max mag is worse than spell damage and recovery in my opinion in long fights and SPC have more weaker max magicka too. SPC is inferior in every aspect other than giving buff to seperate groups.
ZoS should make SPC best set for unorganised group and Olorime should stay best for organised groups. It is 12 men content set anyways. All you want is SPC to get removed (5 years old anyways!) and olorime to be the only healer set in the game that give major courage. I think they can remove sheer venom and other old buffed sets too because they are from 4 man content and 5 years old. What a stupid argumen this is, I cant believe you use it.
Now they made spc useless. Duration is so low, it will have a high downtime and you still want it to be even more weaker?
Max mag and spell power are healing stats, dont portray them as offensive on a healer. But sustain is better on healer. Breton was the favorite healer class for long time because of better sustain. I would preffer Olorime's 2-3-4 piece bonus over SPC's.
Channeled Focus
Magicka Recovery Glyph
Heavy Attacks
Clockwork Citrus Filet (or Witchmothers)
This is from alcast's templar healer guide. Can you see it? The heavy atack. Why would you waste time with heavy atack while you can cast more skills? Because you run out of magicka. So what do you need even while using Olorime? More magicka. Max mag is worse than spell damage and recovery in my opinion in long fights and SPC have more weaker max magicka too. SPC is inferior in every aspect other than giving buff to seperate groups.
ZoS should make SPC best set for unorganised group and Olorime should stay best for organised groups. It is 12 men content set anyways. All you want is SPC to get removed (5 years old anyways!) and olorime to be the only healer set in the game that give major courage. I think they can remove sheer venom and other old buffed sets too because they are from 4 man content and 5 years old. What a stupid argumen this is, I cant believe you use it.
